Multilevel brain functional connectivity and task-based representations explaining heterogeneity in major depressive disorder.

IF 5.8 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Qi Liu, Xinqi Zhou, Chunmei Lan, Xiaolei Xu, Yuanshu Chen, Taolin Chen, Jinhui Wang, Bo Zhou, Dezhong Yao, Keith M Kendrick, Benjamin Becker, Weihua Zhao
{"title":"Multilevel brain functional connectivity and task-based representations explaining heterogeneity in major depressive disorder.","authors":"Qi Liu, Xinqi Zhou, Chunmei Lan, Xiaolei Xu, Yuanshu Chen, Taolin Chen, Jinhui Wang, Bo Zhou, Dezhong Yao, Keith M Kendrick, Benjamin Becker, Weihua Zhao","doi":"10.1038/s41398-025-03413-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a devastating mental disorder characterized by considerable clinical and biological heterogeneity. While comparable clinical symptoms may represent a common pathological endpoint, it is conceivable that distinct neurophysiological mechanisms underlie their manifestation. In this study, both static and model-based dynamic functional connectivity were employed as predictive variables in the normative model to map multilevel functional developmental trajectories and determined clusters of distinguishable MDD subgroups in a large multi-site resting fMRI dataset of 2428 participants (healthy controls: N = 1128; MDD: N = 1300). An independent cohort of 72 participants (healthy controls: N = 35; MDD: N = 37) with both resting fMRI and task-based fMRI data was utilized to validate the identified MDD subtypes and explore subtype-specific task-based neural representations. Our findings indicated brain-wide, interpatient heterogeneous multilevel brain functional deviations in MDD. We identified two distinct and reproducible MDD subtypes, exhibiting comparable severity of clinical symptoms but opposing patterns of multilevel functional deviations. Specifically, MDD subtype 1 displayed positive deviations in the frontoparietal and default mode networks, coupled with negative deviations in the occipital and sensorimotor networks. Conversely, MDD subtype 2 exhibited a significantly contrasting deviation pattern. Additionally, we found that these two identified MDD subtypes exhibited different neural representations during empathic processing, while the subtypes did not differ during implicit face processing. These findings underscore the neurobiological complexity of MDD and highlights the need for a multifaceted approach to diagnosis and treatment that can be tailored specifically to individual subtypes, facilitating personalized and more effective interventions for individuals with MDD.</p>","PeriodicalId":23278,"journal":{"name":"Translational Psychiatry","volume":"15 1","pages":"199"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12166080/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-025-03413-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a devastating mental disorder characterized by considerable clinical and biological heterogeneity. While comparable clinical symptoms may represent a common pathological endpoint, it is conceivable that distinct neurophysiological mechanisms underlie their manifestation. In this study, both static and model-based dynamic functional connectivity were employed as predictive variables in the normative model to map multilevel functional developmental trajectories and determined clusters of distinguishable MDD subgroups in a large multi-site resting fMRI dataset of 2428 participants (healthy controls: N = 1128; MDD: N = 1300). An independent cohort of 72 participants (healthy controls: N = 35; MDD: N = 37) with both resting fMRI and task-based fMRI data was utilized to validate the identified MDD subtypes and explore subtype-specific task-based neural representations. Our findings indicated brain-wide, interpatient heterogeneous multilevel brain functional deviations in MDD. We identified two distinct and reproducible MDD subtypes, exhibiting comparable severity of clinical symptoms but opposing patterns of multilevel functional deviations. Specifically, MDD subtype 1 displayed positive deviations in the frontoparietal and default mode networks, coupled with negative deviations in the occipital and sensorimotor networks. Conversely, MDD subtype 2 exhibited a significantly contrasting deviation pattern. Additionally, we found that these two identified MDD subtypes exhibited different neural representations during empathic processing, while the subtypes did not differ during implicit face processing. These findings underscore the neurobiological complexity of MDD and highlights the need for a multifaceted approach to diagnosis and treatment that can be tailored specifically to individual subtypes, facilitating personalized and more effective interventions for individuals with MDD.

多层次脑功能连接和任务表征解释重性抑郁症的异质性。
重度抑郁症(MDD)是一种毁灭性的精神障碍,具有相当大的临床和生物学异质性。虽然类似的临床症状可能代表一个共同的病理终点,但可以想象,不同的神经生理机制是其表现的基础。在这项研究中,静态和基于模型的动态功能连通性被用作规范模型中的预测变量,以绘制多层次的功能发展轨迹,并确定2428名参与者(健康对照组:N = 1128;Mdd: n = 1300)。独立队列72名参与者(健康对照:N = 35;MDD: N = 37),同时使用静息功能磁共振成像和基于任务的功能磁共振成像数据来验证已识别的MDD亚型,并探索亚型特异性的基于任务的神经表征。我们的研究结果表明,重度抑郁症患者存在全脑、患者间异质性的多层次脑功能偏差。我们确定了两种截然不同且可重复的重度抑郁症亚型,表现出相当严重的临床症状,但相反的多水平功能偏差模式。具体来说,MDD亚型1在额顶叶和默认模式网络中表现出正向偏差,在枕叶和感觉运动网络中表现出负向偏差。相反,MDD亚型2表现出明显相反的偏差模式。此外,我们发现这两种MDD亚型在共情加工中表现出不同的神经表征,而在内隐面孔加工中则没有差异。这些发现强调了重度抑郁症的神经生物学复杂性,并强调需要一种多方面的诊断和治疗方法,可以专门针对个体亚型,促进个性化和更有效的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychiatry has suffered tremendously by the limited translational pipeline. Nobel laureate Julius Axelrod''s discovery in 1961 of monoamine reuptake by pre-synaptic neurons still forms the basis of contemporary antidepressant treatment. There is a grievous gap between the explosion of knowledge in neuroscience and conceptually novel treatments for our patients. Translational Psychiatry bridges this gap by fostering and highlighting the pathway from discovery to clinical applications, healthcare and global health. We view translation broadly as the full spectrum of work that marks the pathway from discovery to global health, inclusive. The steps of translation that are within the scope of Translational Psychiatry include (i) fundamental discovery, (ii) bench to bedside, (iii) bedside to clinical applications (clinical trials), (iv) translation to policy and health care guidelines, (v) assessment of health policy and usage, and (vi) global health. All areas of medical research, including — but not restricted to — molecular biology, genetics, pharmacology, imaging and epidemiology are welcome as they contribute to enhance the field of translational psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信