A scoping review on reporting of methods in DSS colitis mouse models.

IF 1.3 4区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Michaela Thallmair, Paulin Jirkof
{"title":"A scoping review on reporting of methods in DSS colitis mouse models.","authors":"Michaela Thallmair, Paulin Jirkof","doi":"10.1177/00236772251331677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are a major health burden, and incidence as well as prevalence have increased over the last decades. Colitis animal models are used to explore the underlying pathogenesis of and therapeutic options for IBD. Since the reporting of specific aspects of colitis studies using mice has been criticized in the past, we performed a scoping review based on the PRISMA guidelines to assess putative improvements in the quality of reporting. A defined search for dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) murine colitis models was performed in three literature databases (PubMed, PubMed Central®, and Embase) for two time periods: 2007/2008 and 2017. Data were extracted from 122 articles published in 2007/2008 and 236 publications from 2017. We checked the articles for the reporting of details of the colitis model (DSS properties, manufacturer, concentration, duration of application, mouse strain, sex, source), measures to reduce allocation, performance and detection bias (randomization and blinding), and information on clinical assessment, refinements, and humane endpoints. Our results showed that there was significant improvement over time in the scores for refinement and, based on this, also the completeness score. However, the other aspects were poorly reported, suggesting that this research field may need to adopt reporting guidelines such as ARRIVE, the Gold Standard Publication Checklist, or the colitis methods checklist when writing and reviewing publications.</p>","PeriodicalId":18013,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory Animals","volume":" ","pages":"236772251331677"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory Animals","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00236772251331677","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are a major health burden, and incidence as well as prevalence have increased over the last decades. Colitis animal models are used to explore the underlying pathogenesis of and therapeutic options for IBD. Since the reporting of specific aspects of colitis studies using mice has been criticized in the past, we performed a scoping review based on the PRISMA guidelines to assess putative improvements in the quality of reporting. A defined search for dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) murine colitis models was performed in three literature databases (PubMed, PubMed Central®, and Embase) for two time periods: 2007/2008 and 2017. Data were extracted from 122 articles published in 2007/2008 and 236 publications from 2017. We checked the articles for the reporting of details of the colitis model (DSS properties, manufacturer, concentration, duration of application, mouse strain, sex, source), measures to reduce allocation, performance and detection bias (randomization and blinding), and information on clinical assessment, refinements, and humane endpoints. Our results showed that there was significant improvement over time in the scores for refinement and, based on this, also the completeness score. However, the other aspects were poorly reported, suggesting that this research field may need to adopt reporting guidelines such as ARRIVE, the Gold Standard Publication Checklist, or the colitis methods checklist when writing and reviewing publications.

DSS结肠炎小鼠模型研究方法综述。
炎症性肠病(IBDs)是一种主要的健康负担,在过去的几十年里,发病率和患病率都有所增加。结肠炎动物模型用于探索IBD的潜在发病机制和治疗选择。由于过去使用小鼠报道结肠炎研究的特定方面受到批评,我们根据PRISMA指南进行了范围审查,以评估报告质量的可能改进。在三个文献数据库(PubMed、PubMed Central®和Embase)中对2007/2008年和2017年两个时间段进行了葡聚糖硫酸钠(DSS)小鼠结肠炎模型的明确搜索。数据摘自2007/2008年发表的122篇文章和2017年发表的236篇文章。我们检查了报道结肠炎模型细节的文章(DSS特性、制造商、浓度、应用时间、小鼠品系、性别、来源),减少分配、性能和检测偏倚(随机化和盲化)的措施,以及临床评估、改进和人道终点的信息。我们的结果表明,随着时间的推移,精炼分数和基于此的完整性分数有了显著的提高。然而,其他方面的报道很少,这表明该研究领域在撰写和审查出版物时可能需要采用诸如ARRIVE,金标准出版物检查表或结肠炎方法检查表等报告指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Laboratory Animals
Laboratory Animals 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The international journal of laboratory animal science and welfare, Laboratory Animals publishes peer-reviewed original papers and reviews on all aspects of the use of animals in biomedical research. The journal promotes improvements in the welfare or well-being of the animals used, it particularly focuses on research that reduces the number of animals used or which replaces animal models with in vitro alternatives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信