Models of cerebrovascular reactivity in BOLD-fMRI and transcranial Doppler ultrasound.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 PHYSIOLOGY
Journal of applied physiology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-14 DOI:10.1152/japplphysiol.00107.2025
Genevieve Hayes, Sierra Sparks, Daniel P Bulte, Joana Pinto
{"title":"Models of cerebrovascular reactivity in BOLD-fMRI and transcranial Doppler ultrasound.","authors":"Genevieve Hayes, Sierra Sparks, Daniel P Bulte, Joana Pinto","doi":"10.1152/japplphysiol.00107.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ability of cerebrovasculature to respond to meet tissue demands is vital for normal brain function and health. Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR), a measure of the responsiveness of cerebrovasculature to vasoactive stimuli, is a valuable tool for evaluating cerebrovascular health. Although CVR is commonly assessed using transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD), which measures blood velocity, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based techniques such as blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) imaging, which reflect changes in blood oxygenation, direct comparisons between these modalities remain limited, particularly with stimuli that induce a large dynamic range. Because both methods capture hypercapnia-induced vascular changes, we hypothesized that their CVR metrics may be correlated. This study evaluates intermodality correlations of CVR using TCD and BOLD-functional MRI (fMRI) extracted from the middle cerebral artery territory (parietal lobe) during a ramped hypercapnic protocol and different modeling strategies. Linear correlations across broad end-tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide ([Formula: see text]) ranges validated the utility of linear CVR modeling in capturing repeatable metrics using TCD and MRI. A four-parameter sigmoid model revealed significant intermodality variability in span and bound parameters, improved by fixing these parameters and focusing on slope and inflection point, which enhanced the correlations between modalities. These results support the reliability of linear CVR modeling within narrow vasoactive response ranges in healthy subjects and propose a simplified two-parameter sigmoid model as an effective framework for characterizing nonlinear CVR dynamics. This work adds to the sparse literature on intermodality CVR comparisons and indicates which CVR metrics are comparable between TCD and BOLD-fMRI, emphasizing CVR as a useful tool for assessing cerebrovascular health in research and clinical contexts.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> This study compares cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) between transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) and BOLD-fMRI using a hypercapnia protocol. Linear intermodality correlations across [Formula: see text] ranges validate linear CVR modeling. Significant variability in a four-parameter sigmoid model was mitigated by fixing span and bound parameters, supporting a two-parameter model for improved agreement but reducing sensitivity to diminished reserve. These findings clarify which CVR metrics are consistent between TCD and BOLD-fMRI, advancing multimodal integration for cerebrovascular health assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":15160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied physiology","volume":" ","pages":"219-230"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00107.2025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ability of cerebrovasculature to respond to meet tissue demands is vital for normal brain function and health. Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR), a measure of the responsiveness of cerebrovasculature to vasoactive stimuli, is a valuable tool for evaluating cerebrovascular health. Although CVR is commonly assessed using transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD), which measures blood velocity, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based techniques such as blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) imaging, which reflect changes in blood oxygenation, direct comparisons between these modalities remain limited, particularly with stimuli that induce a large dynamic range. Because both methods capture hypercapnia-induced vascular changes, we hypothesized that their CVR metrics may be correlated. This study evaluates intermodality correlations of CVR using TCD and BOLD-functional MRI (fMRI) extracted from the middle cerebral artery territory (parietal lobe) during a ramped hypercapnic protocol and different modeling strategies. Linear correlations across broad end-tidal partial pressure of carbon dioxide ([Formula: see text]) ranges validated the utility of linear CVR modeling in capturing repeatable metrics using TCD and MRI. A four-parameter sigmoid model revealed significant intermodality variability in span and bound parameters, improved by fixing these parameters and focusing on slope and inflection point, which enhanced the correlations between modalities. These results support the reliability of linear CVR modeling within narrow vasoactive response ranges in healthy subjects and propose a simplified two-parameter sigmoid model as an effective framework for characterizing nonlinear CVR dynamics. This work adds to the sparse literature on intermodality CVR comparisons and indicates which CVR metrics are comparable between TCD and BOLD-fMRI, emphasizing CVR as a useful tool for assessing cerebrovascular health in research and clinical contexts.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study compares cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) between transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) and BOLD-fMRI using a hypercapnia protocol. Linear intermodality correlations across [Formula: see text] ranges validate linear CVR modeling. Significant variability in a four-parameter sigmoid model was mitigated by fixing span and bound parameters, supporting a two-parameter model for improved agreement but reducing sensitivity to diminished reserve. These findings clarify which CVR metrics are consistent between TCD and BOLD-fMRI, advancing multimodal integration for cerebrovascular health assessment.

BOLD-fMRI和经颅多普勒超声的脑血管反应性模型。
脑血管系统响应组织需求的能力对正常的脑功能和健康至关重要。脑血管反应性(CVR)是衡量脑血管系统对血管活性刺激反应性的一种指标,是评价脑血管健康状况的重要工具。虽然CVR通常是通过测量血流速度的经颅多普勒超声(TCD)或基于mri的技术(如反映血氧变化的血氧水平依赖(BOLD)成像)来评估的,但这些方式之间的直接比较仍然有限,特别是在刺激诱导大动态范围的情况下。因为这两种方法都能捕获高碳酸血症引起的血管变化,我们假设它们的CVR指标可能是相关的。本研究利用从MCA区域(顶叶)提取的TCD和BOLD-fMRI评估了CVR在坡道高碳酸血症方案和不同建模策略期间的模态间相关性。在广泛的PETCO2范围内的线性相关性验证了线性CVR建模在使用TCD和MRI捕获可重复指标方面的实用性。四参数sigmoid模型显示了跨度和边界参数的显著模态间变异,通过固定这些参数并关注斜率和拐点来改善这些参数,增强了模态间的相关性。这些结果支持了线性CVR模型在健康受试者狭窄血管活性反应范围内的可靠性,并提出了一个简化的双参数s型模型作为表征非线性CVR动力学的有效框架。这项工作补充了关于跨模式CVR比较的稀疏文献,并表明TCD和BOLD-fMRI之间的CVR指标具有可比性,强调了CVR在研究和临床环境中作为评估脑血管健康的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Physiology publishes the highest quality original research and reviews that examine novel adaptive and integrative physiological mechanisms in humans and animals that advance the field. The journal encourages the submission of manuscripts that examine the acute and adaptive responses of various organs, tissues, cells and/or molecular pathways to environmental, physiological and/or pathophysiological stressors. As an applied physiology journal, topics of interest are not limited to a particular organ system. The journal, therefore, considers a wide array of integrative and translational research topics examining the mechanisms involved in disease processes and mitigation strategies, as well as the promotion of health and well-being throughout the lifespan. Priority is given to manuscripts that provide mechanistic insight deemed to exert an impact on the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信