Sit to stand is a new reliable method for assessing strength, power, and velocity exercise in adult pediatric cancer survivors.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Ángela Rodríguez-Perea, Daniel Jerez-Mayorga, Esther Ubago-Guisado, Andres Marmol-Perez, Daniel Jiménez-Lupión, Andrea Rodríguez-Solana, Luis Javier Chirosa Rios, Francisco J Llorente-Cantarero, María Herrada-Robles, Luis Gracia-Marco
{"title":"Sit to stand is a new reliable method for assessing strength, power, and velocity exercise in adult pediatric cancer survivors.","authors":"Ángela Rodríguez-Perea, Daniel Jerez-Mayorga, Esther Ubago-Guisado, Andres Marmol-Perez, Daniel Jiménez-Lupión, Andrea Rodríguez-Solana, Luis Javier Chirosa Rios, Francisco J Llorente-Cantarero, María Herrada-Robles, Luis Gracia-Marco","doi":"10.1007/s00432-025-06225-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to analyze the intra-set reliability of 5 sit-to-stand (5-STS) exercises with a functional electromechanical dynamometer (FEMD) and to determine and compare the load-velocity (L-V) profile in the STS exercise in adult pediatric cancer survivors by sex, age, body mass index, and type and treatment of cancer.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 47 participants performed the 5-STS test with 5% and 20% body weight (BW) to assess intrasession reliability and analyze differences in L-V profiles by sex, age, BMI, and type and treatment of cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Very high and extremely high relative reliability was found for both the 5% STS (ICC = 0.80-0.94) and the 20% STS (ICC = 0.87-0.95) relate to average and peak force, power, and velocity. Regarding L-V profiles, significant differences were only found in relation to sex for the velocity-axis intercept and area under the line (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 5-STS test with a load of 5% and 20% of BW using a FEMD is a reliable method for assessing strength, power, and velocity exercise in adult pediatric cancer survivors. There was a relation to sex for the variables of L-V profile.</p><p><strong>Implications for cancer survivors: </strong>Reliable assessments of muscular strength, like the 5-STS test using FEMD, offer a safer, less demanding alternative to maximal strength tests (e.g., 1RM), enabling precise intensity control and better-tailored rehabilitation programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15118,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","volume":"151 6","pages":"189"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12166015/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-025-06225-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to analyze the intra-set reliability of 5 sit-to-stand (5-STS) exercises with a functional electromechanical dynamometer (FEMD) and to determine and compare the load-velocity (L-V) profile in the STS exercise in adult pediatric cancer survivors by sex, age, body mass index, and type and treatment of cancer.

Method: A total of 47 participants performed the 5-STS test with 5% and 20% body weight (BW) to assess intrasession reliability and analyze differences in L-V profiles by sex, age, BMI, and type and treatment of cancer.

Results: Very high and extremely high relative reliability was found for both the 5% STS (ICC = 0.80-0.94) and the 20% STS (ICC = 0.87-0.95) relate to average and peak force, power, and velocity. Regarding L-V profiles, significant differences were only found in relation to sex for the velocity-axis intercept and area under the line (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The 5-STS test with a load of 5% and 20% of BW using a FEMD is a reliable method for assessing strength, power, and velocity exercise in adult pediatric cancer survivors. There was a relation to sex for the variables of L-V profile.

Implications for cancer survivors: Reliable assessments of muscular strength, like the 5-STS test using FEMD, offer a safer, less demanding alternative to maximal strength tests (e.g., 1RM), enabling precise intensity control and better-tailored rehabilitation programs.

从坐到站是评估成人儿童癌症幸存者力量、力量和速度锻炼的一种新的可靠方法。
目的:我们旨在用功能性机电测力仪(FEMD)分析5种坐立(5-STS)运动的组内可靠性,并确定和比较成人儿童癌症幸存者在性别、年龄、体重指数、癌症类型和治疗方面的STS运动的负荷-速度(L-V)分布。方法:47名参与者分别以5%和20%体重(BW)进行5-STS测试,评估病程内可靠性,并分析L-V谱在性别、年龄、BMI、癌症类型和治疗方面的差异。结果:5% STS (ICC = 0.80-0.94)和20% STS (ICC = 0.87-0.95)在平均力、峰值力、功率和速度方面的相对信度分别为非常高和极高。关于L-V曲线,只有在速度轴截距和线下面积方面发现了与性别有关的显著差异(p)结论:使用FEMD负载5%和20%体重的5-STS测试是评估成年儿童癌症幸存者力量,力量和速度运动的可靠方法。L-V剖面的变量与性别有一定的关系。对癌症幸存者的影响:可靠的肌肉力量评估,如使用FEMD的5-STS测试,提供了一种更安全、要求更低的替代最大力量测试(例如1RM),实现了精确的强度控制和更好的定制康复方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
2.80%
发文量
577
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The "Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology" publishes significant and up-to-date articles within the fields of experimental and clinical oncology. The journal, which is chiefly devoted to Original papers, also includes Reviews as well as Editorials and Guest editorials on current, controversial topics. The section Letters to the editors provides a forum for a rapid exchange of comments and information concerning previously published papers and topics of current interest. Meeting reports provide current information on the latest results presented at important congresses. The following fields are covered: carcinogenesis - etiology, mechanisms; molecular biology; recent developments in tumor therapy; general diagnosis; laboratory diagnosis; diagnostic and experimental pathology; oncologic surgery; and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信