Risk of ovarian cancer in women with pelvic inflammatory disease and homologous recombination repair gene mutations under 55: a population-based cohort study.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Chenzhao Feng, Wanwan Luo, Zanhong Wang, Xi Cao, Chunlin Dong, Fuxia Li, Rourou Xiao, Bin Yang, Gang Chen, Chaoyang Sun, Zhiqiang Han, Xingjie Hao, Beibei Wang
{"title":"Risk of ovarian cancer in women with pelvic inflammatory disease and homologous recombination repair gene mutations under 55: a population-based cohort study.","authors":"Chenzhao Feng, Wanwan Luo, Zanhong Wang, Xi Cao, Chunlin Dong, Fuxia Li, Rourou Xiao, Bin Yang, Gang Chen, Chaoyang Sun, Zhiqiang Han, Xingjie Hao, Beibei Wang","doi":"10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To address the relation among pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), genetic vulnerability and ovarian cancer (OC) risk, we assessed the association between PID and OC risk, alongside the interplay with germline homologous recombination repair (gHR) mutation, utilizing the UK Biobank.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective cohort study in the UK Biobank by tracking OC incidences between individuals with and without a PID history. Identification of gHR mutations (<i>BRCA1</i>, <i>BRCA2</i>, <i>RAD51C</i>, <i>RAD51D</i>, <i>BRIP1</i>) carriers were accomplished through paired whole-exome sequencing data. We used Cox's regression models to evaluate the hazard ratios (HRs) for OC risks under PID.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the large prospective cohort study, the adjusted HR for OC in patients with PID was 1.45 (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.90, 2.32) compared with those with non-PID. Intriguingly, age-stratified analysis unveiled a positive association between PID history and OC risk in those aged under 55 years (HR=1.92; 95% CI=1.02, 3.63). Moreover, individuals aged younger than 55 years harboring both a history of PID and gHR mutations exhibited the highest risk of OC (HR=7.40; 95% CI=1.03, 53.10).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An association between PID and OC risk emerged, notably in the subgroup aged younger than 55 years old. Individuals with both a PID history and gHR mutations exhibited the highest risk of OC. These findings imply PID as a potential precursor for OC, underscoring the importance of early intervention, particularly in the younger population with gHR mutations.</p>","PeriodicalId":15868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gynecologic Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gynecologic Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e126","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To address the relation among pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), genetic vulnerability and ovarian cancer (OC) risk, we assessed the association between PID and OC risk, alongside the interplay with germline homologous recombination repair (gHR) mutation, utilizing the UK Biobank.

Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study in the UK Biobank by tracking OC incidences between individuals with and without a PID history. Identification of gHR mutations (BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51C, RAD51D, BRIP1) carriers were accomplished through paired whole-exome sequencing data. We used Cox's regression models to evaluate the hazard ratios (HRs) for OC risks under PID.

Results: In the large prospective cohort study, the adjusted HR for OC in patients with PID was 1.45 (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.90, 2.32) compared with those with non-PID. Intriguingly, age-stratified analysis unveiled a positive association between PID history and OC risk in those aged under 55 years (HR=1.92; 95% CI=1.02, 3.63). Moreover, individuals aged younger than 55 years harboring both a history of PID and gHR mutations exhibited the highest risk of OC (HR=7.40; 95% CI=1.03, 53.10).

Conclusion: An association between PID and OC risk emerged, notably in the subgroup aged younger than 55 years old. Individuals with both a PID history and gHR mutations exhibited the highest risk of OC. These findings imply PID as a potential precursor for OC, underscoring the importance of early intervention, particularly in the younger population with gHR mutations.

55岁以下患有盆腔炎和同源重组修复基因突变的女性患卵巢癌的风险:一项基于人群的队列研究
目的:为了研究盆腔炎(PID)、遗传易感性和卵巢癌(OC)风险之间的关系,我们利用英国生物银行(UK Biobank)评估了盆腔炎(PID)和卵巢癌风险之间的关系,以及盆腔炎与种系同源重组修复(gHR)突变之间的相互作用。方法:我们在英国生物银行进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,通过跟踪有和没有PID病史的个体之间的OC发病率。通过配对全外显子组测序数据,鉴定gHR突变(BRCA1、BRCA2、RAD51C、RAD51D、BRIP1)携带者。我们使用Cox回归模型评估PID下OC风险的风险比(hr)。结果:在大型前瞻性队列研究中,与非PID患者相比,PID患者OC的校正HR为1.45(95%可信区间[CI]=0.90, 2.32)。有趣的是,年龄分层分析显示,55岁以下人群的PID病史与OC风险呈正相关(HR=1.92;95% ci =1.02, 3.63)。此外,年龄小于55岁且同时有PID和gHR突变史的个体患OC的风险最高(HR=7.40;95% ci =1.03, 53.10)。结论:PID与OC风险之间存在关联,特别是在年龄小于55岁的亚组中。同时具有PID病史和gHR突变的个体患OC的风险最高。这些发现暗示PID是OC的潜在前兆,强调了早期干预的重要性,特别是在gHR突变的年轻人群中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology ONCOLOGY-OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
84
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gynecologic Oncology (JGO) is an official publication of the Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology. Abbreviated title is ''J Gynecol Oncol''. It was launched in 1990. The JGO''s aim is to publish the highest quality manuscripts dedicated to the advancement of care of the patients with gynecologic cancer. It is an international peer-reviewed periodical journal that is published bimonthly (January, March, May, July, September, and November). Supplement numbers are at times published. The journal publishes editorials, original and review articles, correspondence, book review, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信