Psychotherapists' and Trainees' Experiences With Co-Therapy in a Training Setting: Roles, Benefits, Challenges, and Teamwork Strategies.

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Jorge Valdiviezo-Oña, Martín Moreno-Oliva, Jenmaya Trujillo, Alejandro Unda-López, Nicole Ortiz-Mancheno, Clara Paz
{"title":"Psychotherapists' and Trainees' Experiences With Co-Therapy in a Training Setting: Roles, Benefits, Challenges, and Teamwork Strategies.","authors":"Jorge Valdiviezo-Oña, Martín Moreno-Oliva, Jenmaya Trujillo, Alejandro Unda-López, Nicole Ortiz-Mancheno, Clara Paz","doi":"10.1002/jclp.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore therapists' and trainees' experiences using co-therapy in a university psychotherapy training service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Therapists (n = 18) and trainees (n = 19) aged 21-36 from an outpatient psychotherapy service located in Ecuador participated in the study. All participants took part in semi-structured interviews. Data were analyzed using the framework analysis approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most therapists and trainees had not prior experience with co-therapy. Therapists' roles at this service often involved guiding trainees and fostering mutual learning and support. Trainees also highlighted the learning opportunities that co-therapy provided; however, they expressed discomfort with administrative burdens. Co-therapy was seen as beneficial for offering diverse perspectives, for collaborative discussion and for guided intervention. Challenges included communication issues and clients feeling intimidated. Both groups emphasized the need for open communication and collaborative planning.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>From therapists' and trainees' perspectives, co-therapy is a feasible approach for both training and conducting psychotherapy. It can enhance therapeutic outcomes by integrating multiple perspectives on case formulation, progress assessment, and therapeutic direction. For trainees, co-therapy provides real-world exposure to diverse therapeutic approaches, helps understand relational dynamics, and offers continuous support from a therapy partner and network. Other training services may implement structured co-therapy programs for training, prioritizing effective communication and collaboration, and providing clear guidelines to manage challenges. Co-therapy teams should consider clients' preferences and comfort levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":15395,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.70006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore therapists' and trainees' experiences using co-therapy in a university psychotherapy training service.

Methods: Therapists (n = 18) and trainees (n = 19) aged 21-36 from an outpatient psychotherapy service located in Ecuador participated in the study. All participants took part in semi-structured interviews. Data were analyzed using the framework analysis approach.

Results: Most therapists and trainees had not prior experience with co-therapy. Therapists' roles at this service often involved guiding trainees and fostering mutual learning and support. Trainees also highlighted the learning opportunities that co-therapy provided; however, they expressed discomfort with administrative burdens. Co-therapy was seen as beneficial for offering diverse perspectives, for collaborative discussion and for guided intervention. Challenges included communication issues and clients feeling intimidated. Both groups emphasized the need for open communication and collaborative planning.

Conclusion: From therapists' and trainees' perspectives, co-therapy is a feasible approach for both training and conducting psychotherapy. It can enhance therapeutic outcomes by integrating multiple perspectives on case formulation, progress assessment, and therapeutic direction. For trainees, co-therapy provides real-world exposure to diverse therapeutic approaches, helps understand relational dynamics, and offers continuous support from a therapy partner and network. Other training services may implement structured co-therapy programs for training, prioritizing effective communication and collaboration, and providing clear guidelines to manage challenges. Co-therapy teams should consider clients' preferences and comfort levels.

心理治疗师和受训者在培训环境中接受联合治疗的经历:角色、利益、挑战和团队合作策略。
目的:探讨在某高校心理治疗培训服务中,治疗师与学员采用联合治疗的体会。方法:来自厄瓜多尔门诊心理治疗服务的治疗师(n = 18)和受训人员(n = 19)参加了这项研究,年龄在21-36岁之间。所有参与者都参加了半结构化访谈。采用框架分析法对数据进行分析。结果:大多数治疗师和受训人员没有联合治疗的经验。治疗师在这项服务中的角色通常包括指导受训者,促进相互学习和支持。学员还强调了联合治疗提供的学习机会;然而,他们对行政负担表示不满。联合治疗被认为有利于提供不同的观点,协作讨论和指导干预。挑战包括沟通问题和客户感到害怕。双方都强调了开放沟通和协作规划的必要性。结论:从治疗师和学员的角度来看,联合治疗是培训和实施心理治疗的可行方法。它可以通过整合病例制定、进展评估和治疗方向等多个角度来提高治疗效果。对于受训者来说,联合治疗提供了真实世界中不同治疗方法的接触,帮助理解关系动态,并提供来自治疗伙伴和网络的持续支持。其他培训服务可能会实施结构化的联合治疗方案,优先考虑有效的沟通和协作,并提供明确的指导方针来管理挑战。联合治疗团队应考虑患者的偏好和舒适程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Journal of Clinical Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.30%
发文量
177
期刊介绍: Founded in 1945, the Journal of Clinical Psychology is a peer-reviewed forum devoted to research, assessment, and practice. Published eight times a year, the Journal includes research studies; articles on contemporary professional issues, single case research; brief reports (including dissertations in brief); notes from the field; and news and notes. In addition to papers on psychopathology, psychodiagnostics, and the psychotherapeutic process, the journal welcomes articles focusing on psychotherapy effectiveness research, psychological assessment and treatment matching, clinical outcomes, clinical health psychology, and behavioral medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信