Predicting takotsubo syndrome subtypes: An interpretable machine learning model for differentiating emotional versus physical aetiologies

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Diego Scuppa , Francesca Colaceci , Marco Sciandrone , Luca Arcari , Enrica G. Mariano , Beatrice Maria Musumeci , Emanuele Barbato , Leonarda Galiuto
{"title":"Predicting takotsubo syndrome subtypes: An interpretable machine learning model for differentiating emotional versus physical aetiologies","authors":"Diego Scuppa ,&nbsp;Francesca Colaceci ,&nbsp;Marco Sciandrone ,&nbsp;Luca Arcari ,&nbsp;Enrica G. Mariano ,&nbsp;Beatrice Maria Musumeci ,&nbsp;Emanuele Barbato ,&nbsp;Leonarda Galiuto","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcard.2025.133509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) is an acute coronary syndrome characterized by a reversible, mostly apical dysfunction of the left ventricle. Based on the triggering event, TTS has been classified as primary due to emotional causes and secondary due to physical stress. Using a comprehensive machine-learning approach, we aimed to distinguish between these two types of TTS, an essential task for optimizing patient care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Based on a dataset of 320 TTS patients from a research group in Rome, a logistic regression model was trained to develop an interpretable predictive model capable of accurately classifying the aetiology of TTS in individual patients using admission-based clinical markers.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The developed model achieved 74 % accuracy, 75 % precision and recall, 72 % specificity, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.78. Based on the studies conducted, chest pain, dyspnoea, atrial fibrillation, sex, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart rate, and cancer were identified as key clinical features for differentiating between the two TTS types. An external validation cohort of 121 TTS patients has been employed further to assess the performance of the trained classification model, obtaining 74 % accuracy, 77 % precision, 91 % recall, 27 % specificity, and an AUC of 0.62.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>An interpretable machine learning model has been developed, demonstrating the ability to distinguish between emotional versus physical aetiologies in TTS, highlighting the most impactful clinical factors. As built considering clinical variables recorded at admission, the model may serve as an immediate tool that can guide clinicians in their practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13710,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cardiology","volume":"437 ","pages":"Article 133509"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167527325005522","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) is an acute coronary syndrome characterized by a reversible, mostly apical dysfunction of the left ventricle. Based on the triggering event, TTS has been classified as primary due to emotional causes and secondary due to physical stress. Using a comprehensive machine-learning approach, we aimed to distinguish between these two types of TTS, an essential task for optimizing patient care.

Methods

Based on a dataset of 320 TTS patients from a research group in Rome, a logistic regression model was trained to develop an interpretable predictive model capable of accurately classifying the aetiology of TTS in individual patients using admission-based clinical markers.

Results

The developed model achieved 74 % accuracy, 75 % precision and recall, 72 % specificity, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.78. Based on the studies conducted, chest pain, dyspnoea, atrial fibrillation, sex, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart rate, and cancer were identified as key clinical features for differentiating between the two TTS types. An external validation cohort of 121 TTS patients has been employed further to assess the performance of the trained classification model, obtaining 74 % accuracy, 77 % precision, 91 % recall, 27 % specificity, and an AUC of 0.62.

Conclusions

An interpretable machine learning model has been developed, demonstrating the ability to distinguish between emotional versus physical aetiologies in TTS, highlighting the most impactful clinical factors. As built considering clinical variables recorded at admission, the model may serve as an immediate tool that can guide clinicians in their practice.
预测takotsubo综合征亚型:一种可解释的机器学习模型,用于区分情绪与身体病因。
背景:Takotsubo综合征(TTS)是一种急性冠状动脉综合征,其特征是可逆的,主要是左心室尖顶功能障碍。根据触发事件的不同,TTS分为情绪性诱发的原发性和生理应激性诱发的继发性。使用全面的机器学习方法,我们旨在区分这两种类型的TTS,这是优化患者护理的基本任务。方法:基于来自罗马一个研究小组的320名TTS患者的数据集,对逻辑回归模型进行了训练,以开发一个可解释的预测模型,该模型能够使用基于入院的临床标志物对个体患者的TTS病因进行准确分类。结果:建立的模型准确率为74 %,精密度和召回率为75 %,特异性为72 %,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.78。根据所进行的研究,胸痛、呼吸困难、心房颤动、性别、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、心率和癌症被确定为区分两种TTS类型的关键临床特征。121例TTS患者的外部验证队列进一步评估了训练后的分类模型的性能,获得了74 %的准确率,77 %的准确率,91 %的召回率,27 %的特异性,AUC为0.62。结论:已经开发了一个可解释的机器学习模型,展示了区分TTS的情绪和身体病因的能力,突出了最具影响力的临床因素。由于考虑到入院时记录的临床变量,该模型可以作为指导临床医生实践的直接工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International journal of cardiology
International journal of cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.70%
发文量
758
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cardiology is devoted to cardiology in the broadest sense. Both basic research and clinical papers can be submitted. The journal serves the interest of both practicing clinicians and researchers. In addition to original papers, we are launching a range of new manuscript types, including Consensus and Position Papers, Systematic Reviews, Meta-analyses, and Short communications. Case reports are no longer acceptable. Controversial techniques, issues on health policy and social medicine are discussed and serve as useful tools for encouraging debate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信