Diego Scuppa , Francesca Colaceci , Marco Sciandrone , Luca Arcari , Enrica G. Mariano , Beatrice Maria Musumeci , Emanuele Barbato , Leonarda Galiuto
{"title":"Predicting takotsubo syndrome subtypes: An interpretable machine learning model for differentiating emotional versus physical aetiologies","authors":"Diego Scuppa , Francesca Colaceci , Marco Sciandrone , Luca Arcari , Enrica G. Mariano , Beatrice Maria Musumeci , Emanuele Barbato , Leonarda Galiuto","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcard.2025.133509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) is an acute coronary syndrome characterized by a reversible, mostly apical dysfunction of the left ventricle. Based on the triggering event, TTS has been classified as primary due to emotional causes and secondary due to physical stress. Using a comprehensive machine-learning approach, we aimed to distinguish between these two types of TTS, an essential task for optimizing patient care.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Based on a dataset of 320 TTS patients from a research group in Rome, a logistic regression model was trained to develop an interpretable predictive model capable of accurately classifying the aetiology of TTS in individual patients using admission-based clinical markers.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The developed model achieved 74 % accuracy, 75 % precision and recall, 72 % specificity, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.78. Based on the studies conducted, chest pain, dyspnoea, atrial fibrillation, sex, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart rate, and cancer were identified as key clinical features for differentiating between the two TTS types. An external validation cohort of 121 TTS patients has been employed further to assess the performance of the trained classification model, obtaining 74 % accuracy, 77 % precision, 91 % recall, 27 % specificity, and an AUC of 0.62.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>An interpretable machine learning model has been developed, demonstrating the ability to distinguish between emotional versus physical aetiologies in TTS, highlighting the most impactful clinical factors. As built considering clinical variables recorded at admission, the model may serve as an immediate tool that can guide clinicians in their practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13710,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cardiology","volume":"437 ","pages":"Article 133509"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167527325005522","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) is an acute coronary syndrome characterized by a reversible, mostly apical dysfunction of the left ventricle. Based on the triggering event, TTS has been classified as primary due to emotional causes and secondary due to physical stress. Using a comprehensive machine-learning approach, we aimed to distinguish between these two types of TTS, an essential task for optimizing patient care.
Methods
Based on a dataset of 320 TTS patients from a research group in Rome, a logistic regression model was trained to develop an interpretable predictive model capable of accurately classifying the aetiology of TTS in individual patients using admission-based clinical markers.
Results
The developed model achieved 74 % accuracy, 75 % precision and recall, 72 % specificity, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.78. Based on the studies conducted, chest pain, dyspnoea, atrial fibrillation, sex, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart rate, and cancer were identified as key clinical features for differentiating between the two TTS types. An external validation cohort of 121 TTS patients has been employed further to assess the performance of the trained classification model, obtaining 74 % accuracy, 77 % precision, 91 % recall, 27 % specificity, and an AUC of 0.62.
Conclusions
An interpretable machine learning model has been developed, demonstrating the ability to distinguish between emotional versus physical aetiologies in TTS, highlighting the most impactful clinical factors. As built considering clinical variables recorded at admission, the model may serve as an immediate tool that can guide clinicians in their practice.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Cardiology is devoted to cardiology in the broadest sense. Both basic research and clinical papers can be submitted. The journal serves the interest of both practicing clinicians and researchers.
In addition to original papers, we are launching a range of new manuscript types, including Consensus and Position Papers, Systematic Reviews, Meta-analyses, and Short communications. Case reports are no longer acceptable. Controversial techniques, issues on health policy and social medicine are discussed and serve as useful tools for encouraging debate.