Motor vehicle crash death rates among passenger vehicle occupants and pedestrians by county-level social vulnerability and urbanicity: the USA, 2019.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Vaughn Barry, Sarah Abigail Matthews, Laurie Beck, Sarah Rockhill, Kelly Fletcher, Bethany A West, Michael Ballesteros
{"title":"Motor vehicle crash death rates among passenger vehicle occupants and pedestrians by county-level social vulnerability and urbanicity: the USA, 2019.","authors":"Vaughn Barry, Sarah Abigail Matthews, Laurie Beck, Sarah Rockhill, Kelly Fletcher, Bethany A West, Michael Ballesteros","doi":"10.1136/ip-2025-045633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Communities experiencing more social vulnerability are disproportionately harmed by environmental disasters, disease, and injury. This cross-sectional study examined whether US county-level vulnerability scores were associated with 2019 passenger vehicle occupant or pedestrian death rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>County-level vulnerability was measured by 2020 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Social Vulnerability Index scores. Scores were based on 16 community-level characteristics categorised into 4 themes: socioeconomic status; household characteristics; race and ethnicity and housing type and transportation. Counties were divided into quartiles from least to most vulnerable, based on the score distribution among all counties. Deaths were identified from the 2019 Fatality Analysis Reporting System. Death rates per 100 000 population were stratified by vulnerability quartile and urbanicity. Large central metropolitan county results used the second least vulnerability quartile as reference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 328 320 065 people across 3140 counties, there were 22 942 occupant and 6272 pedestrian deaths. Occupant death rates were higher in most vulnerable counties compared with least for all urbanicity levels (large central metropolitan: 4.0 vs 2.8; large fringe metropolitan: 7.4 vs 5.2; medium/small metropolitan: 8.9 vs 7.0; non-metropolitan: 18.5 vs 12.2) with disparities prominent in counties experiencing more socioeconomic and household vulnerability. Pedestrian death rates were highest in most vulnerable counties compared with least (large central metropolitan: 2.5 vs 1.4; large fringe metropolitan: 3.3 vs 1.0; medium/small metropolitan: 2.8 vs 0.8; non-metropolitan: 2.4 vs 0.9) with disparities prominent for all four vulnerability types.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tailoring prevention strategies to communities experiencing infrastructure inadequacies, improving safe transportation options and reducing poverty may help reduce crash death disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":13682,"journal":{"name":"Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ip-2025-045633","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Communities experiencing more social vulnerability are disproportionately harmed by environmental disasters, disease, and injury. This cross-sectional study examined whether US county-level vulnerability scores were associated with 2019 passenger vehicle occupant or pedestrian death rates.

Methods: County-level vulnerability was measured by 2020 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Social Vulnerability Index scores. Scores were based on 16 community-level characteristics categorised into 4 themes: socioeconomic status; household characteristics; race and ethnicity and housing type and transportation. Counties were divided into quartiles from least to most vulnerable, based on the score distribution among all counties. Deaths were identified from the 2019 Fatality Analysis Reporting System. Death rates per 100 000 population were stratified by vulnerability quartile and urbanicity. Large central metropolitan county results used the second least vulnerability quartile as reference.

Results: Among 328 320 065 people across 3140 counties, there were 22 942 occupant and 6272 pedestrian deaths. Occupant death rates were higher in most vulnerable counties compared with least for all urbanicity levels (large central metropolitan: 4.0 vs 2.8; large fringe metropolitan: 7.4 vs 5.2; medium/small metropolitan: 8.9 vs 7.0; non-metropolitan: 18.5 vs 12.2) with disparities prominent in counties experiencing more socioeconomic and household vulnerability. Pedestrian death rates were highest in most vulnerable counties compared with least (large central metropolitan: 2.5 vs 1.4; large fringe metropolitan: 3.3 vs 1.0; medium/small metropolitan: 2.8 vs 0.8; non-metropolitan: 2.4 vs 0.9) with disparities prominent for all four vulnerability types.

Conclusions: Tailoring prevention strategies to communities experiencing infrastructure inadequacies, improving safe transportation options and reducing poverty may help reduce crash death disparities.

按县级社会脆弱性和城市化程度划分的乘用车乘员和行人车祸死亡率:美国,2019。
背景:遭受更多社会脆弱性的社区不成比例地受到环境灾害、疾病和伤害的伤害。这项横断面研究调查了美国县级脆弱性评分是否与2019年乘用车乘员或行人死亡率相关。方法:采用2020年美国疾病预防控制中心社会脆弱性指数评分对县级脆弱性进行测量。评分基于16个社区层面的特征,分为4个主题:社会经济地位;家庭特征;种族,民族,住房类型和交通。根据所有县的得分分布,从最不脆弱到最脆弱的县分为四分之一。死亡人数从2019年病死率分析报告系统中确定。每10万人的死亡率按脆弱性四分位数和城市化程度分层。大型中心都市县的结果以第二低脆弱性四分位数作为参考。结果:在3140个县的328 320 065人中,有22 942人死亡,6272人死亡。与所有城市化水平最低的县相比,最脆弱县的居民死亡率更高(大型中心城市:4.0 vs 2.8;大型边缘都市:7.4 vs 5.2;中小都市:8.9 vs 7.0;非大都市:18.5 vs 12.2),在社会经济和家庭脆弱性更大的县,差异突出。最脆弱县的行人死亡率最高,而最脆弱县的行人死亡率最低(大城市:2.5 vs 1.4;大型边缘都市:3.3 vs 1.0;中小都市:2.8 vs 0.8;非大都市:2.4 vs 0.9),所有四种脆弱性类型的差异都很突出。结论:根据基础设施不足的社区量身定制预防策略,改善安全交通选择和减少贫困可能有助于缩小车祸死亡差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Injury Prevention
Injury Prevention 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
2.70%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1995, Injury Prevention has been the pre-eminent repository of original research and compelling commentary relevant to this increasingly important field. An international peer reviewed journal, it offers the best in science, policy, and public health practice to reduce the burden of injury in all age groups around the world. The journal publishes original research, opinion, debate and special features on the prevention of unintentional, occupational and intentional (violence-related) injuries. Injury Prevention is online only.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信