{"title":"Muscle oxygenation levels in smokers and non-smokers during exercise: insights from a university-based study.","authors":"Buğra Kerget, Büşranur Taşkin, Alperen Aksakal, Hatice Beyza Özkan, Elif Yilmazel Uçar","doi":"10.1007/s00421-025-05829-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Today, as the age of smoking is decreasing, awareness of the harms of tobacco is still not at a sufficient level among young people. In our study, we aimed to compare the muscle oxygenation levels between students who smoke and those who do not smoke after the training on the harms of tobacco products.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 40 smokers and 30 non-smokers, aged 23 and studying at our university, participated between November 2024 and December 2024. Vastus lateralis muscle oxygenation was measured during the six-minute walking test (6MWT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In smokers, exhaled CO, pulse at the beginning and end of 6MWT, Borg dyspnea, and fatigue scores were significantly higher than in non-smokers (p < 0.001). Maximum and minimum SmO<sub>2</sub> levels measured at the beginning and end of 6MWT were lower in smokers (p < 0.001), while changes in SmO<sub>2</sub> were greater in smokers (p < 0.001). Smoking level negatively correlated with maximum and minimum SmO<sub>2</sub> and positively with ΔSmO<sub>2</sub> (R = - 0.82, p < 0.001; R = 0.83, p < 0.001; R = 0.79, p < 0.001). Similarly, exhaled CO negatively correlated with maximum and minimum SmO<sub>2</sub> and positively with ΔSmO<sub>2</sub> (R = - 0.83, p < 0.001; R = 0.84, p < 0.001; R = 0.78, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Smoking causes a decrease in muscle oxygenation depending on the amount smoked. We believe that this cumulative burden may be a precursor to comorbidities that develop in later ages.</p>","PeriodicalId":12005,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-025-05829-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Today, as the age of smoking is decreasing, awareness of the harms of tobacco is still not at a sufficient level among young people. In our study, we aimed to compare the muscle oxygenation levels between students who smoke and those who do not smoke after the training on the harms of tobacco products.
Methods: A total of 40 smokers and 30 non-smokers, aged 23 and studying at our university, participated between November 2024 and December 2024. Vastus lateralis muscle oxygenation was measured during the six-minute walking test (6MWT).
Results: In smokers, exhaled CO, pulse at the beginning and end of 6MWT, Borg dyspnea, and fatigue scores were significantly higher than in non-smokers (p < 0.001). Maximum and minimum SmO2 levels measured at the beginning and end of 6MWT were lower in smokers (p < 0.001), while changes in SmO2 were greater in smokers (p < 0.001). Smoking level negatively correlated with maximum and minimum SmO2 and positively with ΔSmO2 (R = - 0.82, p < 0.001; R = 0.83, p < 0.001; R = 0.79, p < 0.001). Similarly, exhaled CO negatively correlated with maximum and minimum SmO2 and positively with ΔSmO2 (R = - 0.83, p < 0.001; R = 0.84, p < 0.001; R = 0.78, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Smoking causes a decrease in muscle oxygenation depending on the amount smoked. We believe that this cumulative burden may be a precursor to comorbidities that develop in later ages.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Applied Physiology (EJAP) aims to promote mechanistic advances in human integrative and translational physiology. Physiology is viewed broadly, having overlapping context with related disciplines such as biomechanics, biochemistry, endocrinology, ergonomics, immunology, motor control, and nutrition. EJAP welcomes studies dealing with physical exercise, training and performance. Studies addressing physiological mechanisms are preferred over descriptive studies. Papers dealing with animal models or pathophysiological conditions are not excluded from consideration, but must be clearly relevant to human physiology.