Modulation of primary human apical papilla stem cells: Influence of Enterococcus faecalis, oxygen levels, and calcium silicate-based cements.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Olena Rakhimova, Valeriia Zymovets, Lahood Abdalla, Bagir Soltani, Malin Brundin, Peyman Kelk, Nelly Romani Vestman
{"title":"Modulation of primary human apical papilla stem cells: Influence of Enterococcus faecalis, oxygen levels, and calcium silicate-based cements.","authors":"Olena Rakhimova, Valeriia Zymovets, Lahood Abdalla, Bagir Soltani, Malin Brundin, Peyman Kelk, Nelly Romani Vestman","doi":"10.1111/eos.70025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stem cells from the apical papilla (SCAP) are essential for regenerative endodontic treatment. Although mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and Biodentine are widely used in regenerative endodontic treatment procedures, their effects on SCAP remain unclear. This study investigated the impact of ProRoot MTA and Biodentine on SCAP viability and mineralization in the presence of Enterococcus faecalis under aerobic and anaerobic environments. Stem cells from the apical papilla were isolated from three healthy donors and exposed to three different surface area-to-volume (SA:V) ratio extracts of ProRoot MTA and Biodentine for 21 days in aerobic or anaerobic conditions. Cell viability was assessed using a neutral red cytotoxicity assay, and mineralization was evaluated by measuring alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity. No significant differences between ProRoot MTA and Biodentine regarding SCAP viability were detected; however, increased cytotoxicity was found (for both ProRoot MTA and Biodentine) at the highest SA:V ratio of extract used. Oxygen availability, as well as variability in responses of SCAP from the different donors, resulted in greater variation of ALP levels than did type of material. Both ProRoot MTA and Biodentine showed comparable effects on SCAP viability and mineralization, with high SA:V ratios of extracts resulting in increased cytotoxicity. Mineralization in SCAP is influenced by oxygen conditions and the presence of E. faecalis, elucidating the need for further in vivo studies to optimize regenerative endodontic treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11983,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oral Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"e70025"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Oral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.70025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stem cells from the apical papilla (SCAP) are essential for regenerative endodontic treatment. Although mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and Biodentine are widely used in regenerative endodontic treatment procedures, their effects on SCAP remain unclear. This study investigated the impact of ProRoot MTA and Biodentine on SCAP viability and mineralization in the presence of Enterococcus faecalis under aerobic and anaerobic environments. Stem cells from the apical papilla were isolated from three healthy donors and exposed to three different surface area-to-volume (SA:V) ratio extracts of ProRoot MTA and Biodentine for 21 days in aerobic or anaerobic conditions. Cell viability was assessed using a neutral red cytotoxicity assay, and mineralization was evaluated by measuring alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity. No significant differences between ProRoot MTA and Biodentine regarding SCAP viability were detected; however, increased cytotoxicity was found (for both ProRoot MTA and Biodentine) at the highest SA:V ratio of extract used. Oxygen availability, as well as variability in responses of SCAP from the different donors, resulted in greater variation of ALP levels than did type of material. Both ProRoot MTA and Biodentine showed comparable effects on SCAP viability and mineralization, with high SA:V ratios of extracts resulting in increased cytotoxicity. Mineralization in SCAP is influenced by oxygen conditions and the presence of E. faecalis, elucidating the need for further in vivo studies to optimize regenerative endodontic treatment outcomes.

人初代根尖乳头干细胞的调节:粪肠球菌、氧水平和硅酸钙基水泥的影响。
来自根尖乳头(SCAP)的干细胞对于再生根管治疗至关重要。虽然矿物三氧化物聚集体(MTA)和生物牙本质广泛应用于再生根管治疗过程,但它们对SCAP的影响尚不清楚。本研究研究了在好氧和厌氧环境下,在粪肠球菌存在的情况下,prooroot MTA和Biodentine对SCAP活力和矿化的影响。从三个健康供体中分离出根尖乳头干细胞,在有氧或厌氧条件下暴露于三种不同表面积体积比(SA:V)的prooroot MTA和Biodentine提取物中21天。使用中性红细胞毒性试验评估细胞活力,通过测量碱性磷酸酶(ALP)活性评估矿化。prooroot MTA与Biodentine在SCAP活力方面无显著差异;然而,在使用最高SA:V比的提取物时,发现细胞毒性增加(对于prooroot MTA和Biodentine)。氧的可用性,以及不同供体SCAP反应的可变性,导致ALP水平的变化比材料类型更大。prooroot MTA和Biodentine对SCAP活力和矿化的影响相当,高SA:V比的提取物导致细胞毒性增加。SCAP中的矿化受氧气条件和粪肠球菌的存在影响,这说明需要进一步的体内研究来优化再生根管治疗结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Oral Sciences
European Journal of Oral Sciences 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
61
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Oral Sciences is an international journal which publishes original research papers within clinical dentistry, on all basic science aspects of structure, chemistry, developmental biology, physiology and pathology of relevant tissues, as well as on microbiology, biomaterials and the behavioural sciences as they relate to dentistry. In general, analytical studies are preferred to descriptive ones. Reviews, Short Communications and Letters to the Editor will also be considered for publication. The journal is published bimonthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信