Advances in multiple myeloma blood-based monitoring and its clinical applications.

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Anastasia Tzasta, Charissa Wijnands, Kim Baalman, Alain J van Gool, Sonja Zweegman, Joannes F M Jacobs
{"title":"Advances in multiple myeloma blood-based monitoring and its clinical applications.","authors":"Anastasia Tzasta, Charissa Wijnands, Kim Baalman, Alain J van Gool, Sonja Zweegman, Joannes F M Jacobs","doi":"10.1080/10408363.2025.2512466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multiple myeloma (MM) is currently still considered incurable. The recent introduction of novel therapeutic options has significantly improved patient outcomes, with more patients achieving positive responses. While this is positive, these deep remissions pose a challenge in disease monitoring and early detection of relapse, causing uncertainty of disease status among patients and healthcare providers. Current blood-based M-protein diagnostics are not sensitive enough to detect minimal residual disease (MRD) and the gold standard method for MRD-evaluation relies on invasive bone marrow biopsies. Several blood-based methods are currently being investigated as potential minimally invasive alternatives. Of these, mass spectrometry-based methods targeting clonotypic peptides (MS-MRD) offers up to 1,000 times higher sensitivity than traditional electrophoresis and immuno-based techniques for M-protein quantification in blood. In addition, methods initially developed for detecting clonal plasma cells in bone marrow are now being explored in peripheral blood, where circulating myeloma cells and cell-free DNA provide independent prognostic value. Next to its value as biomarker of disease activity, the unique M-protein can also play a direct role in causing tissue damage through a variety of different mechanisms. Currently, no diagnostic tests are available that assess M-proteins pathogenicity. Mass spectrometry-based techniques are suited to characterize the structural properties, stability, and post-translational modifications of M-proteins. This may improve our understanding regarding the pathogenic potential of M-proteins and pave the way for novel diagnostics and early identification of those patients who are at risk. This review highlights the emerging landscape of blood-based diagnostics in MM and their potential for clinically relevant applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":10760,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408363.2025.2512466","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multiple myeloma (MM) is currently still considered incurable. The recent introduction of novel therapeutic options has significantly improved patient outcomes, with more patients achieving positive responses. While this is positive, these deep remissions pose a challenge in disease monitoring and early detection of relapse, causing uncertainty of disease status among patients and healthcare providers. Current blood-based M-protein diagnostics are not sensitive enough to detect minimal residual disease (MRD) and the gold standard method for MRD-evaluation relies on invasive bone marrow biopsies. Several blood-based methods are currently being investigated as potential minimally invasive alternatives. Of these, mass spectrometry-based methods targeting clonotypic peptides (MS-MRD) offers up to 1,000 times higher sensitivity than traditional electrophoresis and immuno-based techniques for M-protein quantification in blood. In addition, methods initially developed for detecting clonal plasma cells in bone marrow are now being explored in peripheral blood, where circulating myeloma cells and cell-free DNA provide independent prognostic value. Next to its value as biomarker of disease activity, the unique M-protein can also play a direct role in causing tissue damage through a variety of different mechanisms. Currently, no diagnostic tests are available that assess M-proteins pathogenicity. Mass spectrometry-based techniques are suited to characterize the structural properties, stability, and post-translational modifications of M-proteins. This may improve our understanding regarding the pathogenic potential of M-proteins and pave the way for novel diagnostics and early identification of those patients who are at risk. This review highlights the emerging landscape of blood-based diagnostics in MM and their potential for clinically relevant applications.

多发性骨髓瘤血液监测及其临床应用进展。
多发性骨髓瘤(MM)目前仍被认为是无法治愈的。最近引入的新型治疗方案显著改善了患者的预后,更多的患者获得了积极的反应。虽然这是积极的,但这些深度缓解对疾病监测和早期发现复发提出了挑战,导致患者和医疗保健提供者疾病状态的不确定性。目前基于血液的m蛋白诊断在检测微小残留病(MRD)方面不够敏感,MRD评估的金标准方法依赖于侵入性骨髓活检。目前正在研究几种基于血液的方法作为潜在的微创替代方法。其中,针对克隆型肽(MS-MRD)的基于质谱的方法提供了比传统电泳和基于免疫的血液m蛋白定量技术高1000倍的灵敏度。此外,最初用于检测骨髓中的克隆浆细胞的方法现在正在探索外周血中的克隆浆细胞,其中循环骨髓瘤细胞和无细胞DNA提供独立的预后价值。除了作为疾病活性生物标志物的价值外,独特的m蛋白还可以通过多种不同的机制在引起组织损伤中发挥直接作用。目前,没有可用的诊断测试来评估m蛋白的致病性。基于质谱的技术适合于表征m蛋白的结构特性、稳定性和翻译后修饰。这可能会提高我们对m蛋白致病潜力的理解,并为新的诊断方法和早期识别那些处于危险中的患者铺平道路。这篇综述强调了血液诊断在MM中的新兴前景及其在临床相关应用的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences publishes comprehensive and high quality review articles in all areas of clinical laboratory science, including clinical biochemistry, hematology, microbiology, pathology, transfusion medicine, genetics, immunology and molecular diagnostics. The reviews critically evaluate the status of current issues in the selected areas, with a focus on clinical laboratory diagnostics and latest advances. The adjective “critical” implies a balanced synthesis of results and conclusions that are frequently contradictory and controversial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信