Risk of endometrial cancer after insufficient endometrial biopsy: A retrospective cohort study.

IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Chanella Vang, Kristine Juul Hare, Anna Arday, Reza Rafiolsadat Serizawa, Jeppe Bennekou Schroll
{"title":"Risk of endometrial cancer after insufficient endometrial biopsy: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Chanella Vang, Kristine Juul Hare, Anna Arday, Reza Rafiolsadat Serizawa, Jeppe Bennekou Schroll","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2025.06.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endometrial biopsies are used to diagnose abnormalities in the endometrium, but the biopsies are sometimes insufficient.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the risk of detecting endometrial cancer in individuals with an insufficient endometrial index biopsy compared to individuals with a normal index biopsy.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, we used the Danish Pathology Register to identify individuals with endometrial biopsies between 2013 and 2017. We categorized initial and follow-up samples as either normal, insufficient, hyperplastic, or cancer by using SNOMED codes. We had 4 years of follow-up until December 31<sup>st</sup>, 2021, and we compared categories with Kaplan-Meier analysis, a log-rank test, and Cox regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 80,761 Danish individuals were included. Out of these, 13,964 (17.3%) had an insufficient endometrial index biopsy, meaning the index sample contained too little tissue for a definitive diagnosis. From this group, 6,130 (43.9%) individuals had a follow-up endometrial biopsy performed. Unadjusted for age (HR 3.7; 95% CI 3.56-3.84), the incidence of endometrial cancer (n=368; 2.6%) was higher in individuals with an insufficient index biopsy compared to those with a normal index biopsy (n=423; 0.7%). However, when we adjusted for age, the hazard for endometrial cancer was only slightly higher after an insufficient biopsy compared to a normal biopsy (HR 1.16; 95% CI 1.02-1.31).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found an increased risk of detecting endometrial cancer in individuals with an insufficient index biopsy compared to individuals with a normal index biopsy. After adjusting for age, the risk was only slightly increased.</p>","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2025.06.015","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endometrial biopsies are used to diagnose abnormalities in the endometrium, but the biopsies are sometimes insufficient.

Objective: To evaluate the risk of detecting endometrial cancer in individuals with an insufficient endometrial index biopsy compared to individuals with a normal index biopsy.

Study design: In this retrospective cohort study, we used the Danish Pathology Register to identify individuals with endometrial biopsies between 2013 and 2017. We categorized initial and follow-up samples as either normal, insufficient, hyperplastic, or cancer by using SNOMED codes. We had 4 years of follow-up until December 31st, 2021, and we compared categories with Kaplan-Meier analysis, a log-rank test, and Cox regression.

Results: A total of 80,761 Danish individuals were included. Out of these, 13,964 (17.3%) had an insufficient endometrial index biopsy, meaning the index sample contained too little tissue for a definitive diagnosis. From this group, 6,130 (43.9%) individuals had a follow-up endometrial biopsy performed. Unadjusted for age (HR 3.7; 95% CI 3.56-3.84), the incidence of endometrial cancer (n=368; 2.6%) was higher in individuals with an insufficient index biopsy compared to those with a normal index biopsy (n=423; 0.7%). However, when we adjusted for age, the hazard for endometrial cancer was only slightly higher after an insufficient biopsy compared to a normal biopsy (HR 1.16; 95% CI 1.02-1.31).

Conclusion: We found an increased risk of detecting endometrial cancer in individuals with an insufficient index biopsy compared to individuals with a normal index biopsy. After adjusting for age, the risk was only slightly increased.

子宫内膜活检不充分后发生子宫内膜癌的风险:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:子宫内膜活检用于诊断子宫内膜异常,但活检有时是不充分的。目的:评价子宫内膜指数活检不充分的个体与指数活检正常的个体相比发现子宫内膜癌的风险。研究设计:在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们使用丹麦病理登记册来识别2013年至2017年期间进行子宫内膜活检的个体。我们使用SNOMED代码将初始和后续样本分为正常、不足、增生或癌症。随访4年至2021年12月31日,采用Kaplan-Meier分析、log-rank检验和Cox回归进行分类比较。结果:共纳入80,761名丹麦人。其中,13964例(17.3%)子宫内膜活检指标不足,这意味着指标样本中组织过少,无法进行明确诊断。在这一组中,6130人(43.9%)进行了子宫内膜活检随访。未调整年龄(HR 3.7;95% CI 3.56-3.84),子宫内膜癌的发生率(n=368;指数活检不充分的个体比指数活检正常的个体(n=423;0.7%)。然而,当我们调整年龄时,与正常活检相比,活检不充分后发生子宫内膜癌的风险仅略高(HR 1.16;95% ci 1.02-1.31)。结论:我们发现,与指数活检正常的个体相比,指数活检不充分的个体检测子宫内膜癌的风险增加。在对年龄进行调整后,风险仅略有增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2237
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, known as "The Gray Journal," covers the entire spectrum of Obstetrics and Gynecology. It aims to publish original research (clinical and translational), reviews, opinions, video clips, podcasts, and interviews that contribute to understanding health and disease and have the potential to impact the practice of women's healthcare. Focus Areas: Diagnosis, Treatment, Prediction, and Prevention: The journal focuses on research related to the diagnosis, treatment, prediction, and prevention of obstetrical and gynecological disorders. Biology of Reproduction: AJOG publishes work on the biology of reproduction, including studies on reproductive physiology and mechanisms of obstetrical and gynecological diseases. Content Types: Original Research: Clinical and translational research articles. Reviews: Comprehensive reviews providing insights into various aspects of obstetrics and gynecology. Opinions: Perspectives and opinions on important topics in the field. Multimedia Content: Video clips, podcasts, and interviews. Peer Review Process: All submissions undergo a rigorous peer review process to ensure quality and relevance to the field of obstetrics and gynecology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信