In Vitro Comparison of Two Python-Based Programs for the Automated Analysis of Tight-Junction Phenotype in Brain Endothelium During Bacterial Infection
Henry D. Mauser, Janessa Caroza, Shane Nicole Homez, Alyssa S. Arnett, William D. Cutts, Daryl W. Lam, Justin Thornton, Walter Adams, Brandon J. Kim
{"title":"In Vitro Comparison of Two Python-Based Programs for the Automated Analysis of Tight-Junction Phenotype in Brain Endothelium During Bacterial Infection","authors":"Henry D. Mauser, Janessa Caroza, Shane Nicole Homez, Alyssa S. Arnett, William D. Cutts, Daryl W. Lam, Justin Thornton, Walter Adams, Brandon J. Kim","doi":"10.1002/cbf.70093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Tight junction complexes are crucial features of brain endothelial cells, as they restrict the paracellular route across the blood–brain barrier. Tight junction disruption has been observed in conjunction with numerous diseases of the CNS. In such cases, the organization or integrity of cell–cell junctions may be analyzed with a variety of automated computer programs that quantitatively assess junction images. Here, we directly compare two previously developed python-based programs—JAnaP and IJOQ— for the semi- or fully automated analysis of tight junctions in human stem cell-derived brain-like endothelial cells. Cells were infected with <i>S. pneumoniae</i> and <i>S. agalactiae</i> to initiate junction disruption, and occludin and ZO-1 were analyzed in mock and infected groups via JAnaP and IJOQ. JAnaP and IJOQ both yielded comparable results for the quantification of tight junction disruption in brain endothelial cells. While JAnaP rendered data at the cellular level and gave more information regarding junction phenotype, IJOQ significantly reduced user time and eliminated potential user bias. Our results suggest that JAnaP and IJOQ are both appropriate for quantifying tight junction integrity in brain endothelial cells, and both may offer distinct advantages depending on their context of use.</p>","PeriodicalId":9669,"journal":{"name":"Cell Biochemistry and Function","volume":"43 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cbf.70093","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell Biochemistry and Function","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cbf.70093","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Tight junction complexes are crucial features of brain endothelial cells, as they restrict the paracellular route across the blood–brain barrier. Tight junction disruption has been observed in conjunction with numerous diseases of the CNS. In such cases, the organization or integrity of cell–cell junctions may be analyzed with a variety of automated computer programs that quantitatively assess junction images. Here, we directly compare two previously developed python-based programs—JAnaP and IJOQ— for the semi- or fully automated analysis of tight junctions in human stem cell-derived brain-like endothelial cells. Cells were infected with S. pneumoniae and S. agalactiae to initiate junction disruption, and occludin and ZO-1 were analyzed in mock and infected groups via JAnaP and IJOQ. JAnaP and IJOQ both yielded comparable results for the quantification of tight junction disruption in brain endothelial cells. While JAnaP rendered data at the cellular level and gave more information regarding junction phenotype, IJOQ significantly reduced user time and eliminated potential user bias. Our results suggest that JAnaP and IJOQ are both appropriate for quantifying tight junction integrity in brain endothelial cells, and both may offer distinct advantages depending on their context of use.
期刊介绍:
Cell Biochemistry and Function publishes original research articles and reviews on the mechanisms whereby molecular and biochemical processes control cellular activity with a particular emphasis on the integration of molecular and cell biology, biochemistry and physiology in the regulation of tissue function in health and disease.
The primary remit of the journal is on mammalian biology both in vivo and in vitro but studies of cells in situ are especially encouraged. Observational and pathological studies will be considered providing they include a rational discussion of the possible molecular and biochemical mechanisms behind them and the immediate impact of these observations to our understanding of mammalian biology.