The political economy of carbon farming: Analyzing agribusiness’ accumulation strategy and the imaginary of soil carbon markets

IF 4.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Sarah Hackfort , Tobias Haas
{"title":"The political economy of carbon farming: Analyzing agribusiness’ accumulation strategy and the imaginary of soil carbon markets","authors":"Sarah Hackfort ,&nbsp;Tobias Haas","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The global food regime plays a significant role in accelerating the climate crisis. Carbon Farming (CF) has emerged as a new strategy aimed at reducing emissions and removing carbon from the atmosphere. Major agribusiness corporations, such as BASF, Bayer, Cargill, Corteva, Syngenta, and Yara International, are driving the development and promotion of CF schemes as part of climate-smart agriculture. In this paper, we analyze their motivations, approaches, and the material and discursive practices behind this from a Cultural Political Economy perspective. Using a qualitative analysis of documents, websites and interviews we identify <em>infrastructuring, assetization</em> and <em>incorporation</em> as foundational components of the accumulation strategy, while <em>robust carbon measurement, soil carbon markets</em>, and <em>co-benefits</em> are key components of the imaginary related to CF. We conclude that although the concept of CF remains somewhat vague, it resonates with problematic patterns seen in other sectors, particularly regarding incumbency and the risk of mitigation deterrence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"171 ","pages":"Article 104123"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S146290112500139X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global food regime plays a significant role in accelerating the climate crisis. Carbon Farming (CF) has emerged as a new strategy aimed at reducing emissions and removing carbon from the atmosphere. Major agribusiness corporations, such as BASF, Bayer, Cargill, Corteva, Syngenta, and Yara International, are driving the development and promotion of CF schemes as part of climate-smart agriculture. In this paper, we analyze their motivations, approaches, and the material and discursive practices behind this from a Cultural Political Economy perspective. Using a qualitative analysis of documents, websites and interviews we identify infrastructuring, assetization and incorporation as foundational components of the accumulation strategy, while robust carbon measurement, soil carbon markets, and co-benefits are key components of the imaginary related to CF. We conclude that although the concept of CF remains somewhat vague, it resonates with problematic patterns seen in other sectors, particularly regarding incumbency and the risk of mitigation deterrence.
碳农业的政治经济学:分析农业企业的积累策略与土壤碳市场的想象
全球粮食制度在加速气候危机方面发挥着重要作用。碳农业(CF)已经成为一种旨在减少排放和从大气中去除碳的新战略。BASF、Bayer、Cargill、Corteva、Syngenta和Yara International等大型农业综合企业正在推动CF计划的发展和推广,将其作为气候智能型农业的一部分。本文从文化政治经济学的角度分析了他们的动机、方法及其背后的物质实践和话语实践。通过对文献、网站和访谈的定性分析,我们将基础设施、资产化和合并确定为积累战略的基本组成部分,而稳健的碳测量、土壤碳市场和共同利益是与CF相关的想象的关键组成部分。我们得出结论,尽管CF的概念仍然有些模糊,但它与其他领域的问题模式产生了共鸣。特别是在职和减缓威慑的风险方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Policy
Environmental Science & Policy 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信