Supply–demand price decoupling in European-type day-ahead electricity markets

IF 5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Anita Varga , Botond Feczkó , Marianna E.-Nagy , Dávid Csercsik
{"title":"Supply–demand price decoupling in European-type day-ahead electricity markets","authors":"Anita Varga ,&nbsp;Botond Feczkó ,&nbsp;Marianna E.-Nagy ,&nbsp;Dávid Csercsik","doi":"10.1016/j.ijepes.2025.110788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this paper, we consider the possibility of supply–demand price decoupling in European-type day-ahead electricity markets, considering also the possibility of the supply price exceeding the demand price for some periods. Using a simple market model and an illustrative example, we show that this approach can resolve the paradoxical rejection of block orders and thus potentially increase the total social welfare and surplus of bidders. However, it has additional implications, which must be considered in a potential application. The first is the non-uniqueness of the decoupled market-clearing prices, while the second is that price decoupling affects the relation between the sum of individual bid surpluses and the total social welfare, as these values may no longer be equal, and the approach may imply a nonzero income for the auctioneer. To tackle the issue of non-uniqueness of market-clearing prices, we propose an iterative three-step clearing method. In the second part of the paper, we consider realistic-sized examples, analyze how the proposed approach affects the market outcome. We show that the proposed method reduces the number of paradoxically rejected block bids by 34%–42% and slightly increases the total welfare. In addition, we define a measure (opportunity cost of paradox rejection) to characterize the level of paradox rejection in a clearing solution. We show that the proposed price decoupling-based clearing method may significantly (34%–44%) decrease the value of this measure compared to the conventional clearing approach. We also study the computational demand of the proposed method.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50326,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 110788"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142061525003369","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the possibility of supply–demand price decoupling in European-type day-ahead electricity markets, considering also the possibility of the supply price exceeding the demand price for some periods. Using a simple market model and an illustrative example, we show that this approach can resolve the paradoxical rejection of block orders and thus potentially increase the total social welfare and surplus of bidders. However, it has additional implications, which must be considered in a potential application. The first is the non-uniqueness of the decoupled market-clearing prices, while the second is that price decoupling affects the relation between the sum of individual bid surpluses and the total social welfare, as these values may no longer be equal, and the approach may imply a nonzero income for the auctioneer. To tackle the issue of non-uniqueness of market-clearing prices, we propose an iterative three-step clearing method. In the second part of the paper, we consider realistic-sized examples, analyze how the proposed approach affects the market outcome. We show that the proposed method reduces the number of paradoxically rejected block bids by 34%–42% and slightly increases the total welfare. In addition, we define a measure (opportunity cost of paradox rejection) to characterize the level of paradox rejection in a clearing solution. We show that the proposed price decoupling-based clearing method may significantly (34%–44%) decrease the value of this measure compared to the conventional clearing approach. We also study the computational demand of the proposed method.
欧式日前电力市场的供需价格脱钩
本文考虑了欧式日前电力市场供需价格脱钩的可能性,同时也考虑了某些时段的供应价格超过需求价格的可能性。通过一个简单的市场模型和一个说明性的例子,我们证明了这种方法可以解决拒绝大宗订单的矛盾,从而潜在地增加投标人的总社会福利和剩余。然而,它有额外的含义,这在潜在的应用程序中必须考虑。首先是解耦的市场出清价格的非唯一性,其次是价格解耦影响了个人出价盈余总和与社会总福利之间的关系,因为这些价值可能不再相等,并且这种方法可能意味着拍卖商的收入不为零。为了解决市场出清价格的非唯一性问题,我们提出了一种迭代的三步出清方法。在论文的第二部分,我们考虑了现实规模的例子,分析了所提出的方法如何影响市场结果。我们的研究表明,该方法将悖论拒绝的区块投标数量减少了34%-42%,并略微增加了总福利。此外,我们定义了一个度量(悖论拒绝的机会成本)来描述一个清算解决方案中悖论拒绝的水平。我们表明,与传统的清算方法相比,拟议的基于价格解耦的清算方法可能显著(34%-44%)降低该措施的价值。我们还研究了该方法的计算需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems
International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
17.30%
发文量
1022
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: The journal covers theoretical developments in electrical power and energy systems and their applications. The coverage embraces: generation and network planning; reliability; long and short term operation; expert systems; neural networks; object oriented systems; system control centres; database and information systems; stock and parameter estimation; system security and adequacy; network theory, modelling and computation; small and large system dynamics; dynamic model identification; on-line control including load and switching control; protection; distribution systems; energy economics; impact of non-conventional systems; and man-machine interfaces. As well as original research papers, the journal publishes short contributions, book reviews and conference reports. All papers are peer-reviewed by at least two referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信