{"title":"Supply–demand price decoupling in European-type day-ahead electricity markets","authors":"Anita Varga , Botond Feczkó , Marianna E.-Nagy , Dávid Csercsik","doi":"10.1016/j.ijepes.2025.110788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this paper, we consider the possibility of supply–demand price decoupling in European-type day-ahead electricity markets, considering also the possibility of the supply price exceeding the demand price for some periods. Using a simple market model and an illustrative example, we show that this approach can resolve the paradoxical rejection of block orders and thus potentially increase the total social welfare and surplus of bidders. However, it has additional implications, which must be considered in a potential application. The first is the non-uniqueness of the decoupled market-clearing prices, while the second is that price decoupling affects the relation between the sum of individual bid surpluses and the total social welfare, as these values may no longer be equal, and the approach may imply a nonzero income for the auctioneer. To tackle the issue of non-uniqueness of market-clearing prices, we propose an iterative three-step clearing method. In the second part of the paper, we consider realistic-sized examples, analyze how the proposed approach affects the market outcome. We show that the proposed method reduces the number of paradoxically rejected block bids by 34%–42% and slightly increases the total welfare. In addition, we define a measure (opportunity cost of paradox rejection) to characterize the level of paradox rejection in a clearing solution. We show that the proposed price decoupling-based clearing method may significantly (34%–44%) decrease the value of this measure compared to the conventional clearing approach. We also study the computational demand of the proposed method.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50326,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 110788"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142061525003369","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this paper, we consider the possibility of supply–demand price decoupling in European-type day-ahead electricity markets, considering also the possibility of the supply price exceeding the demand price for some periods. Using a simple market model and an illustrative example, we show that this approach can resolve the paradoxical rejection of block orders and thus potentially increase the total social welfare and surplus of bidders. However, it has additional implications, which must be considered in a potential application. The first is the non-uniqueness of the decoupled market-clearing prices, while the second is that price decoupling affects the relation between the sum of individual bid surpluses and the total social welfare, as these values may no longer be equal, and the approach may imply a nonzero income for the auctioneer. To tackle the issue of non-uniqueness of market-clearing prices, we propose an iterative three-step clearing method. In the second part of the paper, we consider realistic-sized examples, analyze how the proposed approach affects the market outcome. We show that the proposed method reduces the number of paradoxically rejected block bids by 34%–42% and slightly increases the total welfare. In addition, we define a measure (opportunity cost of paradox rejection) to characterize the level of paradox rejection in a clearing solution. We show that the proposed price decoupling-based clearing method may significantly (34%–44%) decrease the value of this measure compared to the conventional clearing approach. We also study the computational demand of the proposed method.
期刊介绍:
The journal covers theoretical developments in electrical power and energy systems and their applications. The coverage embraces: generation and network planning; reliability; long and short term operation; expert systems; neural networks; object oriented systems; system control centres; database and information systems; stock and parameter estimation; system security and adequacy; network theory, modelling and computation; small and large system dynamics; dynamic model identification; on-line control including load and switching control; protection; distribution systems; energy economics; impact of non-conventional systems; and man-machine interfaces.
As well as original research papers, the journal publishes short contributions, book reviews and conference reports. All papers are peer-reviewed by at least two referees.