The association between delegative democratic attitudes and perceptions of China in Thailand from the Asian Barometer Survey

Sanyarat Meesuwan , Eunhong Park
{"title":"The association between delegative democratic attitudes and perceptions of China in Thailand from the Asian Barometer Survey","authors":"Sanyarat Meesuwan ,&nbsp;Eunhong Park","doi":"10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Utilizing nationally representative data from four waves of the Asian Barometer Survey (2010–2022), this study investigates whether delegative democratic orientations shape public perceptions of China's role in Thailand and Asia more broadly. Ordered probit regression shows that support for executive supremacy and anti-oversight beliefs increases the likelihood of favorable views regarding China at both national and regional levels. Constrained accountability, another dimension of delegative attitudes, has no significant effect. Regarding the control variables, media exposure correlates with diminished approval, and urban residency is predictive of less favorable views. The findings suggest that domestic political orientations, rooted in national experiences with authority, influence how citizens assess foreign regimes. When external governance models align with internalized norms, symbolic recognition follows. The study advances legitimacy theory and regime diffusion research by identifying how cognitive convergence enables the transnational appeal of performance-based authoritarianism.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74826,"journal":{"name":"Social sciences & humanities open","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 101680"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social sciences & humanities open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590291125004085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Utilizing nationally representative data from four waves of the Asian Barometer Survey (2010–2022), this study investigates whether delegative democratic orientations shape public perceptions of China's role in Thailand and Asia more broadly. Ordered probit regression shows that support for executive supremacy and anti-oversight beliefs increases the likelihood of favorable views regarding China at both national and regional levels. Constrained accountability, another dimension of delegative attitudes, has no significant effect. Regarding the control variables, media exposure correlates with diminished approval, and urban residency is predictive of less favorable views. The findings suggest that domestic political orientations, rooted in national experiences with authority, influence how citizens assess foreign regimes. When external governance models align with internalized norms, symbolic recognition follows. The study advances legitimacy theory and regime diffusion research by identifying how cognitive convergence enables the transnational appeal of performance-based authoritarianism.
来自亚洲晴雨表调查的泰国代表民主态度与对中国的看法之间的关系
本研究利用亚洲晴雨表调查(2010-2022)的四波全国代表性数据,调查了代议制民主取向是否会更广泛地影响公众对中国在泰国和亚洲角色的看法。有序概率回归显示,对行政至上和反监督信念的支持增加了在国家和地区层面上对中国持有利看法的可能性。受约束的问责制是授权态度的另一个方面,没有显著影响。在控制变量方面,媒体曝光与认可度降低相关,而城市居住对认可度降低有预测作用。研究结果表明,植根于国家权威经验的国内政治取向,会影响公民对外国政权的评价。当外部治理模型与内部化规范一致时,象征性的认可随之而来。该研究通过识别认知趋同如何使基于绩效的威权主义具有跨国吸引力,推进了合法性理论和政权扩散研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social sciences & humanities open
Social sciences & humanities open Psychology (General), Decision Sciences (General), Social Sciences (General)
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
159 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信