Systematic review of pedestrian safety at roundabouts

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS
Erdem Doğan
{"title":"Systematic review of pedestrian safety at roundabouts","authors":"Erdem Doğan","doi":"10.1016/j.jsr.2025.06.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Introduction:</em> Roundabouts are increasingly being used to improve traffic flow and reduce conflict points compared to traditional intersections. While previous studies have generally shown that roundabouts reduce vehicle collisions and improve traffic conditions, their impact on pedestrian safety, particularly in urban areas with high pedestrian traffic, has not been adequately studied. Despite the potential of roundabouts to reduce the overall severity of collisions, recent studies also point to specific safety challenges for pedestrians, including the difficulties faced by slow-moving people, changes in pedestrian behavior when avoiding roundabouts, and problems with disabled pedestrians are faced with. This systematic review fills this gap by evaluating existing research on pedestrian safety at roundabouts and distinguishing it from other review studies. Additionally, this review focuses on examining roundabouts and their impacts on pedestrian safety, synthesizing the literature, and identifying key findings. <em>Method:</em> Four research questions were developed, covering pedestrian behavior, personal traits, traffic volume and speed, geometric and design elements, and pedestrian safety assessment techniques. The research questions and the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) method were used to choose and thoroughly examine 51 studies. In addition, it is intended to support the correct selection of measures to improve pedestrian safety at roundabouts and provide researchers with a reference for safety modeling. <em>Practical Applications:</em> Roundabouts with higher pedestrian safety standards can be planned with the help of this systematic review, which also helps to clarify the factors influencing pedestrian safety at roundabouts. When creating safe and sustainable transportation infrastructure, decision-makers and urban planners can use these findings as a guide.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Safety Research","volume":"94 ","pages":"Pages 70-80"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Safety Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437525000775","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Roundabouts are increasingly being used to improve traffic flow and reduce conflict points compared to traditional intersections. While previous studies have generally shown that roundabouts reduce vehicle collisions and improve traffic conditions, their impact on pedestrian safety, particularly in urban areas with high pedestrian traffic, has not been adequately studied. Despite the potential of roundabouts to reduce the overall severity of collisions, recent studies also point to specific safety challenges for pedestrians, including the difficulties faced by slow-moving people, changes in pedestrian behavior when avoiding roundabouts, and problems with disabled pedestrians are faced with. This systematic review fills this gap by evaluating existing research on pedestrian safety at roundabouts and distinguishing it from other review studies. Additionally, this review focuses on examining roundabouts and their impacts on pedestrian safety, synthesizing the literature, and identifying key findings. Method: Four research questions were developed, covering pedestrian behavior, personal traits, traffic volume and speed, geometric and design elements, and pedestrian safety assessment techniques. The research questions and the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) method were used to choose and thoroughly examine 51 studies. In addition, it is intended to support the correct selection of measures to improve pedestrian safety at roundabouts and provide researchers with a reference for safety modeling. Practical Applications: Roundabouts with higher pedestrian safety standards can be planned with the help of this systematic review, which also helps to clarify the factors influencing pedestrian safety at roundabouts. When creating safe and sustainable transportation infrastructure, decision-makers and urban planners can use these findings as a guide.
环岛行人安全系统检讨
简介:与传统交叉路口相比,环形交叉路口越来越多地用于改善交通流量和减少冲突点。虽然先前的研究普遍表明,环形交叉路口减少了车辆碰撞,改善了交通状况,但它们对行人安全的影响,特别是在行人流量大的城市地区,尚未得到充分的研究。尽管环形交叉路口有可能降低整体碰撞的严重程度,但最近的研究也指出了行人面临的具体安全挑战,包括缓慢移动的人所面临的困难,行人在避开环形交叉路口时的行为变化,以及残疾行人所面临的问题。本系统综述通过评价现有的环形交叉路口行人安全研究并将其与其他综述研究区分开来,填补了这一空白。此外,本综述着重于研究环形交叉路口及其对行人安全的影响,综合文献,并确定关键发现。方法:制定了四个研究问题,包括行人行为、个人特征、交通量和速度、几何和设计元素以及行人安全评估技术。研究问题和PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)方法被用来选择和彻底检查51项研究。同时,为环岛行人安全改善措施的正确选择提供支持,为研究者的安全建模提供参考。实际应用:通过本系统综述,可以规划出行人安全标准较高的环形交叉路口,也有助于理清环形交叉路口行人安全的影响因素。在创建安全和可持续的交通基础设施时,决策者和城市规划者可以将这些发现作为指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
174
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Safety Research is an interdisciplinary publication that provides for the exchange of ideas and scientific evidence capturing studies through research in all areas of safety and health, including traffic, workplace, home, and community. This forum invites research using rigorous methodologies, encourages translational research, and engages the global scientific community through various partnerships (e.g., this outreach includes highlighting some of the latest findings from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信