Evaluation of lead shielding against head leakage from a 6 MV agility linac using FLUKA Monte Carlo simulation

IF 2.8 3区 物理与天体物理 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Turki Almatani, Richard P. Hugtenburg
{"title":"Evaluation of lead shielding against head leakage from a 6 MV agility linac using FLUKA Monte Carlo simulation","authors":"Turki Almatani, Richard P. Hugtenburg","doi":"10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.112974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most studies in the literature focus on in-field dosimetry, with relatively few addressing the accuracy of linear accelerator (linac) models in leakage or out-of-field regions. This study investigates leakage radiation from a linac using Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. An Elekta Synergy linac equipped with an Agility head was modelled using the FLUKA code. Head leakage radiation measurements were performed using a 6 MV photon beam directed both horizontally and vertically. A PTW Spherical Chamber (TK-30) was used to acquire measurements at 13 different locations, each at a fixed source-to-chamber distance of 100 cm. The ion chamber was also explicitly modelled in the simulations. Based on the mean photon energy at each position, the required lead shielding thickness was initially calculated using narrow-beam linear attenuation coefficients. To account for broad-beam geometry, buildup factors—dependent on photon energy and the number of mean free paths—were incorporated. An iterative method was applied until the calculated shielding thicknesses converged. All measured leakage values were within the recommended limit of 0.1% of the maximum absorbed dose at the isocentre, ranging from 0.01% to 0.06%, except at the isocentre itself, which exceeded the limit. The MC simulation results showed good agreement with the measurements. The calculated lead thicknesses required to match the measured leakage ranged from 3.6 cm to 13 cm, depending on the location. This would help improve shielding accuracy and reduce secondary cancer risk from leakage or out-of-field exposure.","PeriodicalId":20861,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","volume":"51 1","pages":"112974"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.112974","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most studies in the literature focus on in-field dosimetry, with relatively few addressing the accuracy of linear accelerator (linac) models in leakage or out-of-field regions. This study investigates leakage radiation from a linac using Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. An Elekta Synergy linac equipped with an Agility head was modelled using the FLUKA code. Head leakage radiation measurements were performed using a 6 MV photon beam directed both horizontally and vertically. A PTW Spherical Chamber (TK-30) was used to acquire measurements at 13 different locations, each at a fixed source-to-chamber distance of 100 cm. The ion chamber was also explicitly modelled in the simulations. Based on the mean photon energy at each position, the required lead shielding thickness was initially calculated using narrow-beam linear attenuation coefficients. To account for broad-beam geometry, buildup factors—dependent on photon energy and the number of mean free paths—were incorporated. An iterative method was applied until the calculated shielding thicknesses converged. All measured leakage values were within the recommended limit of 0.1% of the maximum absorbed dose at the isocentre, ranging from 0.01% to 0.06%, except at the isocentre itself, which exceeded the limit. The MC simulation results showed good agreement with the measurements. The calculated lead thicknesses required to match the measured leakage ranged from 3.6 cm to 13 cm, depending on the location. This would help improve shielding accuracy and reduce secondary cancer risk from leakage or out-of-field exposure.
利用FLUKA蒙特卡罗仿真评估6 MV敏捷直线电机屏蔽头泄漏的铅屏蔽效果
文献中的大多数研究都集中在场内剂量测定上,相对较少涉及泄漏或场外区域线性加速器模型的准确性。本研究利用蒙特卡罗(MC)模拟研究了直线加速器的泄漏辐射。使用FLUKA代码对配备Agility头的Elekta Synergy直线机进行建模。头部泄漏辐射测量采用6 MV光子束水平和垂直方向。PTW球形腔室(TK-30)在13个不同的位置进行测量,每个位置的源与腔室之间的固定距离为100 cm。在模拟中也明确地模拟了离子室。根据每个位置的平均光子能量,采用窄光束线性衰减系数初步计算所需的铅屏蔽厚度。考虑到宽光束的几何形状,建立因子-依赖于光子能量和平均自由路径的数量-被纳入。采用迭代法,直到计算出的屏蔽厚度收敛。所有测量的泄漏值都在等中心最大吸收剂量的0.1%的推荐限值之内,范围从0.01%到0.06%,除了等中心本身超出了限值。MC模拟结果与实测结果吻合较好。根据位置的不同,计算出的引线厚度需要与测量的泄漏相匹配,范围从3.6厘米到13厘米。这将有助于提高屏蔽的准确性,减少泄漏或外场暴露导致的继发性癌症风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiation Physics and Chemistry
Radiation Physics and Chemistry 化学-核科学技术
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
17.20%
发文量
574
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiation Physics and Chemistry is a multidisciplinary journal that provides a medium for publication of substantial and original papers, reviews, and short communications which focus on research and developments involving ionizing radiation in radiation physics, radiation chemistry and radiation processing. The journal aims to publish papers with significance to an international audience, containing substantial novelty and scientific impact. The Editors reserve the rights to reject, with or without external review, papers that do not meet these criteria. This could include papers that are very similar to previous publications, only with changed target substrates, employed materials, analyzed sites and experimental methods, report results without presenting new insights and/or hypothesis testing, or do not focus on the radiation effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信