{"title":"Evaluation of Patient Radiation Exposure during Common Digital Radiography Procedures in a Saudi Tertiary Hospital","authors":"Yousif Abdallah, Abdullah Alamoudi","doi":"10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.113085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conducted on patients undergoing diagnostic X-ray examinations at King Khalid Hospital (KKH) in Majmaah. The investigation focused on the seven most commonly performed radiographic procedures, encompassing a total of 1,504 patients examined using digital radiography (DR) equipment. Patient radiation doses were assessed by calculating the Entrance Surface Air Kerma (ESAK) and Effective Dose (ED), using measured X-ray tube output and exposure parameters. Based on these measurements, appropriate conversion coefficients were applied. This study also analyzed the 75th percentile distributions of ESAK and Kerma Area Product (KAP) and compared the findings with national and international dose reference levels. This study presents the calculated uncertainty (U) values along with the mean ESAK, KAP, and ED values. The recorded ESAK values ranged from 0.12 to 5.74 mGy, KAP from 0.9 to 1.84 Gy·cm<ce:sup loc=\"post\">2</ce:sup>, and ED from 0.01 to 0.23 mSv. These values were found to be significantly lower than the Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) reported in European and national studies, indicating a positive trend in dose optimization. This study emphasizes the importance of regular dose audits and patient dose awareness. Educating patients on radiation risks and optimizing radiographic techniques are essential for minimizing unnecessary exposure while maintaining high diagnostic image quality.","PeriodicalId":20861,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","volume":"22 1","pages":"113085"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.113085","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study was conducted on patients undergoing diagnostic X-ray examinations at King Khalid Hospital (KKH) in Majmaah. The investigation focused on the seven most commonly performed radiographic procedures, encompassing a total of 1,504 patients examined using digital radiography (DR) equipment. Patient radiation doses were assessed by calculating the Entrance Surface Air Kerma (ESAK) and Effective Dose (ED), using measured X-ray tube output and exposure parameters. Based on these measurements, appropriate conversion coefficients were applied. This study also analyzed the 75th percentile distributions of ESAK and Kerma Area Product (KAP) and compared the findings with national and international dose reference levels. This study presents the calculated uncertainty (U) values along with the mean ESAK, KAP, and ED values. The recorded ESAK values ranged from 0.12 to 5.74 mGy, KAP from 0.9 to 1.84 Gy·cm2, and ED from 0.01 to 0.23 mSv. These values were found to be significantly lower than the Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) reported in European and national studies, indicating a positive trend in dose optimization. This study emphasizes the importance of regular dose audits and patient dose awareness. Educating patients on radiation risks and optimizing radiographic techniques are essential for minimizing unnecessary exposure while maintaining high diagnostic image quality.
期刊介绍:
Radiation Physics and Chemistry is a multidisciplinary journal that provides a medium for publication of substantial and original papers, reviews, and short communications which focus on research and developments involving ionizing radiation in radiation physics, radiation chemistry and radiation processing.
The journal aims to publish papers with significance to an international audience, containing substantial novelty and scientific impact. The Editors reserve the rights to reject, with or without external review, papers that do not meet these criteria. This could include papers that are very similar to previous publications, only with changed target substrates, employed materials, analyzed sites and experimental methods, report results without presenting new insights and/or hypothesis testing, or do not focus on the radiation effects.