A data model for population descriptors in genomic research

IF 8.1 1区 生物学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Alyna T. Khan, Clement Adebamowo, Stephanie M. Fullerton, Jibril Hirbo, Iain R. Konigsberg, Peter Kraft, Iman Martin, Sarah C. Nelson, Michèle Ramsay, Genevieve L. Wojcik, Sally N. Adebamowo, Matthew P. Conomos, Burcu F. Darst, Micah R. Hysong, Yun Li, Alicia R. Martin, Rasika A. Mathias, Stephen S. Rich, Lori C. Sakoda, Daniel R. Schrider, Jayati Sharma, Johanna L. Smith, Quan Sun, Yuji Zhang, Polygenic Risk Methods in Diverse Populations (PRIMED) Consortium, Stephanie M. Gogarten
{"title":"A data model for population descriptors in genomic research","authors":"Alyna T. Khan, Clement Adebamowo, Stephanie M. Fullerton, Jibril Hirbo, Iain R. Konigsberg, Peter Kraft, Iman Martin, Sarah C. Nelson, Michèle Ramsay, Genevieve L. Wojcik, Sally N. Adebamowo, Matthew P. Conomos, Burcu F. Darst, Micah R. Hysong, Yun Li, Alicia R. Martin, Rasika A. Mathias, Stephen S. Rich, Lori C. Sakoda, Daniel R. Schrider, Jayati Sharma, Johanna L. Smith, Quan Sun, Yuji Zhang, Polygenic Risk Methods in Diverse Populations (PRIMED) Consortium, Stephanie M. Gogarten","doi":"10.1016/j.ajhg.2025.05.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Population descriptors used in genetic studies have broad social and translational implications. There are no globally agreed-upon definitions or usages of common population descriptors (e.g., race, ethnicity, nationality, and tribe), many of which are applied <ce:italic>ad hoc</ce:italic> and/or derived from political or bureaucratic conventions. Recent recommendations have encouraged the retention of as much granularity in population descriptors as possible during data preparation, analysis, and interpretation of research results. However, genomic research infrastructures (i.e., current practices, resources, and workflows in genomic research) often lack systematic and flexible organization, structure, and harmonization of multifaceted and detailed population descriptor data. This can lead to loss of information, barriers to international collaboration, and potential issues in clinical translation. Here, we describe a data model, developed by the NIH-funded Polygenic Risk Methods in Diverse Populations (PRIMED) Consortium, that organizes and retains detailed population descriptor data for future research use. The model supports a versatile, traceable, and reproducible harmonization system that offers multiple benefits over existing data structures. This data model affords researchers the flexibility to thoughtfully choose and scientifically justify their choice of population descriptors. It avoids the conflation of social identities with biological categories and guards against harmful typological inferences. Genomic research tools of this kind will be crucial for producing scientifically robust findings that minimize potential harms of descriptor misuse while maximizing benefits for diverse communities.","PeriodicalId":7659,"journal":{"name":"American journal of human genetics","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of human genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2025.05.011","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Population descriptors used in genetic studies have broad social and translational implications. There are no globally agreed-upon definitions or usages of common population descriptors (e.g., race, ethnicity, nationality, and tribe), many of which are applied ad hoc and/or derived from political or bureaucratic conventions. Recent recommendations have encouraged the retention of as much granularity in population descriptors as possible during data preparation, analysis, and interpretation of research results. However, genomic research infrastructures (i.e., current practices, resources, and workflows in genomic research) often lack systematic and flexible organization, structure, and harmonization of multifaceted and detailed population descriptor data. This can lead to loss of information, barriers to international collaboration, and potential issues in clinical translation. Here, we describe a data model, developed by the NIH-funded Polygenic Risk Methods in Diverse Populations (PRIMED) Consortium, that organizes and retains detailed population descriptor data for future research use. The model supports a versatile, traceable, and reproducible harmonization system that offers multiple benefits over existing data structures. This data model affords researchers the flexibility to thoughtfully choose and scientifically justify their choice of population descriptors. It avoids the conflation of social identities with biological categories and guards against harmful typological inferences. Genomic research tools of this kind will be crucial for producing scientifically robust findings that minimize potential harms of descriptor misuse while maximizing benefits for diverse communities.
基因组研究中种群描述符的数据模型
遗传研究中使用的种群描述符具有广泛的社会和翻译意义。没有全球商定的共同人口描述符(例如种族、民族、国籍和部落)的定义或用法,其中许多是特别适用的和/或源自政治或官僚惯例。最近的建议鼓励在数据准备、分析和研究结果解释过程中尽可能保留人口描述符的粒度。然而,基因组研究基础设施(即基因组研究中的当前实践、资源和工作流程)往往缺乏系统和灵活的组织、结构,以及对多方面和详细的种群描述符数据的协调。这可能导致信息丢失、国际合作障碍以及临床翻译中的潜在问题。在这里,我们描述了一个数据模型,由美国国立卫生研究院资助的不同人群中的多基因风险方法(PRIMED)联盟开发,该模型组织并保留了详细的人群描述符数据,以供未来的研究使用。该模型支持一个通用的、可跟踪的和可再现的协调系统,它提供了比现有数据结构更多的好处。该数据模型为研究人员提供了深思熟虑地选择和科学地证明他们选择的人口描述符的灵活性。它避免了社会身份与生物类别的合并,并防止有害的类型学推断。这种基因组研究工具对于产生科学可靠的发现至关重要,这些发现可以最大限度地减少描述符滥用的潜在危害,同时最大限度地为不同的社区带来好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.70
自引率
4.10%
发文量
185
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Human Genetics (AJHG) is a monthly journal published by Cell Press, chosen by The American Society of Human Genetics (ASHG) as its premier publication starting from January 2008. AJHG represents Cell Press's first society-owned journal, and both ASHG and Cell Press anticipate significant synergies between AJHG content and that of other Cell Press titles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信