Clinical service organisation for adults with atrial fibrillation: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis.

C Ferguson, F Shaikh, S M Allida, J Hendriks, C Gallagher, B V Bajorek, A Donkor, S C Inglis
{"title":"Clinical service organisation for adults with atrial fibrillation: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"C Ferguson, F Shaikh, S M Allida, J Hendriks, C Gallagher, B V Bajorek, A Donkor, S C Inglis","doi":"10.1093/eurjcn/zvaf113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the effects of organised clinical service delivery models for AF on all-cause mortality and hospitalisation, as well as cardiovascular outcomes, thromboembolic events, bleeding complications, quality of life, symptom burden, healthcare costs, and length of hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>A systematic search was conducted across several databases, including Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL, and clinical trial registries. Randomised controlled trials involving adults (≥ 18 years) with any type of AF were included. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and all-cause hospitalisation. Secondary outcomes included cardiovascular mortality and hospitalisation, AF-related emergency department visits, thromboembolic and bleeding events, quality of life, symptom burden, cost of intervention, and length of hospital stay. Eight studies (8205 participants) investigating collaborative, multidisciplinary, or virtual care models for AF were included. The mean age of participants ranged from 60 to 73 years. Organised AF clinical services likely resulted in a substantial reduction in all-cause mortality (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.89; moderate certainty) and cardiovascular hospitalisation (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.96; high certainty) compared to usual care. However, these services probably made little to no difference to all-cause hospitalisation (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.02; moderate certainty) and may not reduce cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.19; low certainty). The effect on thromboembolic complications and major cerebrovascular events appeared minimal. Minor cerebrovascular events were not reported in any of the included studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Moderate certainty evidence suggests that organised clinical services for AF likely lead to a large decrease in all-cause mortality but probably have minimal impact on all-cause hospitalisation. While cardiovascular hospitalisations were reduced, the effect on cardiovascular mortality remains uncertain. Further research is needed to compare different care organisation models and to confirm findings for inconclusive outcomes, particularly regarding the role of mHealth in AF management. The findings highlight the importance of coordinated care through collaborative, multidisciplinary, and virtual approaches.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>Cochrane Database for Systematic Reviews (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013408.</p>","PeriodicalId":93997,"journal":{"name":"European journal of cardiovascular nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of cardiovascular nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvaf113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To assess the effects of organised clinical service delivery models for AF on all-cause mortality and hospitalisation, as well as cardiovascular outcomes, thromboembolic events, bleeding complications, quality of life, symptom burden, healthcare costs, and length of hospital stay.

Methods and results: A systematic search was conducted across several databases, including Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL, and clinical trial registries. Randomised controlled trials involving adults (≥ 18 years) with any type of AF were included. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and all-cause hospitalisation. Secondary outcomes included cardiovascular mortality and hospitalisation, AF-related emergency department visits, thromboembolic and bleeding events, quality of life, symptom burden, cost of intervention, and length of hospital stay. Eight studies (8205 participants) investigating collaborative, multidisciplinary, or virtual care models for AF were included. The mean age of participants ranged from 60 to 73 years. Organised AF clinical services likely resulted in a substantial reduction in all-cause mortality (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.89; moderate certainty) and cardiovascular hospitalisation (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.96; high certainty) compared to usual care. However, these services probably made little to no difference to all-cause hospitalisation (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.02; moderate certainty) and may not reduce cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.19; low certainty). The effect on thromboembolic complications and major cerebrovascular events appeared minimal. Minor cerebrovascular events were not reported in any of the included studies.

Conclusion: Moderate certainty evidence suggests that organised clinical services for AF likely lead to a large decrease in all-cause mortality but probably have minimal impact on all-cause hospitalisation. While cardiovascular hospitalisations were reduced, the effect on cardiovascular mortality remains uncertain. Further research is needed to compare different care organisation models and to confirm findings for inconclusive outcomes, particularly regarding the role of mHealth in AF management. The findings highlight the importance of coordinated care through collaborative, multidisciplinary, and virtual approaches.

Registration: Cochrane Database for Systematic Reviews (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013408.

成人房颤的临床服务机构:Cochrane系统评价和荟萃分析。
目的:评估有组织的房颤临床服务提供模式对全因死亡率和住院率的影响,以及心血管结局、血栓栓塞事件、出血并发症、生活质量、症状负担、医疗费用和住院时间的影响。方法和结果:对多个数据库进行系统检索,包括Cochrane中央对照试验注册库(Central)、MEDLINE、Embase和CINAHL,以及临床试验注册库。随机对照试验纳入任何类型房颤的成人(≥18岁)。主要结局是全因死亡率和全因住院。次要结局包括心血管死亡率和住院率、房颤相关急诊就诊、血栓栓塞和出血事件、生活质量、症状负担、干预费用和住院时间。8项研究(8205名参与者)调查了AF的协作、多学科或虚拟护理模式。参与者的平均年龄从60岁到73岁不等。有组织的房颤临床服务可能导致全因死亡率的显著降低(RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.46 - 0.89;中度确定性)和心血管住院(RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.71至0.96;高确定性)与常规护理相比。然而,这些服务可能对全因住院率几乎没有影响(RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.88至1.02;中度确定性),可能不会降低心血管死亡率(RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.35 ~ 1.19;低确定性)。对血栓栓塞并发症和主要脑血管事件的影响微乎其微。在所有纳入的研究中均未报告轻微脑血管事件。结论:中等确定性的证据表明,有组织的房颤临床服务可能导致全因死亡率的大幅下降,但对全因住院的影响可能微乎其微。虽然心血管住院治疗减少了,但对心血管死亡率的影响仍不确定。需要进一步的研究来比较不同的护理组织模式,并确认不确定结果的发现,特别是关于移动健康在房颤管理中的作用。研究结果强调了通过协作、多学科和虚拟方法进行协调护理的重要性。注册:Cochrane数据库系统评价(2019)。https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013408。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信