Sense-Making During the RTS,S Malaria Vaccine Pilot Implementation in Ghana.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Esi Thompson Tani-Eshon
{"title":"Sense-Making During the RTS,S Malaria Vaccine Pilot Implementation in Ghana.","authors":"Esi Thompson Tani-Eshon","doi":"10.1177/10497323251347922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The pilot implementation of the RTS,S/AS01E (Mosquirix) malaria vaccine marked a significant step in addressing one of Africa's leading causes of mortality by providing essential data that led to its approval for use in children under two years old in malaria-endemic regions. However, little attention has been given to the lived experiences of caregivers and how they made decisions about participating in the vaccine pilot implementation. This paper takes an interpretive phenomenological analysis lens to understand caregivers' process of negotiating participation in the pilot implementation. I conducted 11 in-depth interviews with caregivers in the RTS,S pilot implementation site in the Assin North district in Ghana. Findings reveal that participants engaged in three overarching sense-making processes to negotiate their involvement in the pilot. These were <i>questioning the vaccine</i>, <i>considering political and socio-economic concerns</i>, and <i>biting the bullet.</i> Embodied within these themes are how agency, power, politics, trust in healthcare workers, and knowledge of vaccines undergird respondents' decision-making regarding the pilot implementation. The study evidenced the need for a holistic approach to engaging community members in pilot sites to guide their vaccine decision-making. By identifying the complex decision-making processes that individuals go through, we can better inform vaccine policy and public messaging to guide vaccine decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":48437,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Health Research","volume":" ","pages":"10497323251347922"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323251347922","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The pilot implementation of the RTS,S/AS01E (Mosquirix) malaria vaccine marked a significant step in addressing one of Africa's leading causes of mortality by providing essential data that led to its approval for use in children under two years old in malaria-endemic regions. However, little attention has been given to the lived experiences of caregivers and how they made decisions about participating in the vaccine pilot implementation. This paper takes an interpretive phenomenological analysis lens to understand caregivers' process of negotiating participation in the pilot implementation. I conducted 11 in-depth interviews with caregivers in the RTS,S pilot implementation site in the Assin North district in Ghana. Findings reveal that participants engaged in three overarching sense-making processes to negotiate their involvement in the pilot. These were questioning the vaccine, considering political and socio-economic concerns, and biting the bullet. Embodied within these themes are how agency, power, politics, trust in healthcare workers, and knowledge of vaccines undergird respondents' decision-making regarding the pilot implementation. The study evidenced the need for a holistic approach to engaging community members in pilot sites to guide their vaccine decision-making. By identifying the complex decision-making processes that individuals go through, we can better inform vaccine policy and public messaging to guide vaccine decision-making.

RTS,S疟疾疫苗在加纳试点实施过程中的意义。
RTS,S/AS01E (moquirix)疟疾疫苗的试点实施提供了必要的数据,导致批准在疟疾流行地区用于两岁以下儿童,这标志着在解决非洲主要死亡原因之一方面迈出了重要一步。然而,很少注意到护理人员的生活经历以及他们如何做出参与疫苗试点实施的决定。本文采用解释现象学分析的视角来理解照顾者谈判参与试点实施的过程。我对加纳阿辛北区RTS,S试点实施地点的护理人员进行了11次深入访谈。研究结果表明,参与者参与了三个总体意义构建过程,以协商他们对试点的参与。他们质疑疫苗,考虑政治和社会经济问题,咬紧牙关。在这些主题中体现的是机构、权力、政治、对卫生保健工作者的信任和疫苗知识如何支撑受访者关于试点实施的决策。这项研究证明,需要采取一种全面的方法,让社区成员参与试验点,以指导他们的疫苗决策。通过确定个人经历的复杂决策过程,我们可以更好地为疫苗政策和公共信息提供信息,以指导疫苗决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH is an international, interdisciplinary, refereed journal for the enhancement of health care and to further the development and understanding of qualitative research methods in health care settings. We welcome manuscripts in the following areas: the description and analysis of the illness experience, health and health-seeking behaviors, the experiences of caregivers, the sociocultural organization of health care, health care policy, and related topics. We also seek critical reviews and commentaries addressing conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and ethical issues pertaining to qualitative enquiry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信