{"title":"Sense-Making During the RTS,S Malaria Vaccine Pilot Implementation in Ghana.","authors":"Esi Thompson Tani-Eshon","doi":"10.1177/10497323251347922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The pilot implementation of the RTS,S/AS01E (Mosquirix) malaria vaccine marked a significant step in addressing one of Africa's leading causes of mortality by providing essential data that led to its approval for use in children under two years old in malaria-endemic regions. However, little attention has been given to the lived experiences of caregivers and how they made decisions about participating in the vaccine pilot implementation. This paper takes an interpretive phenomenological analysis lens to understand caregivers' process of negotiating participation in the pilot implementation. I conducted 11 in-depth interviews with caregivers in the RTS,S pilot implementation site in the Assin North district in Ghana. Findings reveal that participants engaged in three overarching sense-making processes to negotiate their involvement in the pilot. These were <i>questioning the vaccine</i>, <i>considering political and socio-economic concerns</i>, and <i>biting the bullet.</i> Embodied within these themes are how agency, power, politics, trust in healthcare workers, and knowledge of vaccines undergird respondents' decision-making regarding the pilot implementation. The study evidenced the need for a holistic approach to engaging community members in pilot sites to guide their vaccine decision-making. By identifying the complex decision-making processes that individuals go through, we can better inform vaccine policy and public messaging to guide vaccine decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":48437,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Health Research","volume":" ","pages":"10497323251347922"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323251347922","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The pilot implementation of the RTS,S/AS01E (Mosquirix) malaria vaccine marked a significant step in addressing one of Africa's leading causes of mortality by providing essential data that led to its approval for use in children under two years old in malaria-endemic regions. However, little attention has been given to the lived experiences of caregivers and how they made decisions about participating in the vaccine pilot implementation. This paper takes an interpretive phenomenological analysis lens to understand caregivers' process of negotiating participation in the pilot implementation. I conducted 11 in-depth interviews with caregivers in the RTS,S pilot implementation site in the Assin North district in Ghana. Findings reveal that participants engaged in three overarching sense-making processes to negotiate their involvement in the pilot. These were questioning the vaccine, considering political and socio-economic concerns, and biting the bullet. Embodied within these themes are how agency, power, politics, trust in healthcare workers, and knowledge of vaccines undergird respondents' decision-making regarding the pilot implementation. The study evidenced the need for a holistic approach to engaging community members in pilot sites to guide their vaccine decision-making. By identifying the complex decision-making processes that individuals go through, we can better inform vaccine policy and public messaging to guide vaccine decision-making.
期刊介绍:
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH is an international, interdisciplinary, refereed journal for the enhancement of health care and to further the development and understanding of qualitative research methods in health care settings. We welcome manuscripts in the following areas: the description and analysis of the illness experience, health and health-seeking behaviors, the experiences of caregivers, the sociocultural organization of health care, health care policy, and related topics. We also seek critical reviews and commentaries addressing conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and ethical issues pertaining to qualitative enquiry.