Obesity, Underweight, and Accuracy of eGFR Using Cystatin C and Creatinine in a Northern European Population.

IF 10.3 1区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
William A Russel, Edouard L Fu, Alessandro Bosi, Aurora Caldinelli, Lesley A Inker, Alex R Chang, Andrew S Levey, Juan J Carrero
{"title":"Obesity, Underweight, and Accuracy of eGFR Using Cystatin C and Creatinine in a Northern European Population.","authors":"William A Russel, Edouard L Fu, Alessandro Bosi, Aurora Caldinelli, Lesley A Inker, Alex R Chang, Andrew S Levey, Juan J Carrero","doi":"10.1681/ASN.0000000760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The presence of a low or high body mass index (BMI) in patients may influence the accuracy of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). This study evaluates the performance of eGFR equations across the range of BMI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is an observational study of 4,707 adults (7,503 repeated observations) referred for measured GFR (mGFR) in Stockholm, Sweden. We calculated indexed eGFR (in mL/min/1.73 m2) and non-indexed eGFR (in mL/min) with validated equations that use creatinine (eGFRcr), cystatin C (eGFRcys), or both (eGFRcr-cys). We assessed equation performance against indexed and non-indexed mGFR across categories of BMI with median bias, P30 (the percentage of estimated values within 30% of mGFR), and classification of GFR categories, and modelled the implications of choice of filtration marker and indexing on clinical decisions regarding dose-adjustment or eligibility for treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age(SD)was 57(16) years (39% female), and median(IQR) indexed and non-indexed mGFR were 59(39-79) and 65(42-87), respectively. In total, 9% of participants were underweight (BMI <20 kg/m2) and 18% were obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2). For indexed and non-indexed eGFR for all equations, eGFRcr overestimated mGFR at BMI <20 kg/m2 and ≥30 kg/m2, and eGFRcys underestimated mGFR at BMI ≥30 kg/m2. eGFRcr-cys had the least bias, acceptable P30, and highest correct classification throughout the BMI range. In theoretical modelling, using indexed eGFRcr-cys vs. eGFRcr would allow more accurate clinical decisions across all BMI categories. Using non-indexed vs. indexed eGFRcr-cys would lead to further but smaller improvement that was not consistently related to BMI category for these decisions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a clinical population of northern European individuals referred for GFR measurement, indexed eGFRcr-cys was more accurate than indexed eGFRcr across the BMI spectrum and may improve classification accuracy for treatment decisions. Using non-indexed eGFRcr-cys further improved accuracy for some treatment decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":17217,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Society of Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The American Society of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.0000000760","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The presence of a low or high body mass index (BMI) in patients may influence the accuracy of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). This study evaluates the performance of eGFR equations across the range of BMI.

Methods: This is an observational study of 4,707 adults (7,503 repeated observations) referred for measured GFR (mGFR) in Stockholm, Sweden. We calculated indexed eGFR (in mL/min/1.73 m2) and non-indexed eGFR (in mL/min) with validated equations that use creatinine (eGFRcr), cystatin C (eGFRcys), or both (eGFRcr-cys). We assessed equation performance against indexed and non-indexed mGFR across categories of BMI with median bias, P30 (the percentage of estimated values within 30% of mGFR), and classification of GFR categories, and modelled the implications of choice of filtration marker and indexing on clinical decisions regarding dose-adjustment or eligibility for treatment.

Results: Mean age(SD)was 57(16) years (39% female), and median(IQR) indexed and non-indexed mGFR were 59(39-79) and 65(42-87), respectively. In total, 9% of participants were underweight (BMI <20 kg/m2) and 18% were obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2). For indexed and non-indexed eGFR for all equations, eGFRcr overestimated mGFR at BMI <20 kg/m2 and ≥30 kg/m2, and eGFRcys underestimated mGFR at BMI ≥30 kg/m2. eGFRcr-cys had the least bias, acceptable P30, and highest correct classification throughout the BMI range. In theoretical modelling, using indexed eGFRcr-cys vs. eGFRcr would allow more accurate clinical decisions across all BMI categories. Using non-indexed vs. indexed eGFRcr-cys would lead to further but smaller improvement that was not consistently related to BMI category for these decisions.

Conclusions: In a clinical population of northern European individuals referred for GFR measurement, indexed eGFRcr-cys was more accurate than indexed eGFRcr across the BMI spectrum and may improve classification accuracy for treatment decisions. Using non-indexed eGFRcr-cys further improved accuracy for some treatment decisions.

北欧人群中肥胖、体重不足和使用胱抑素C和肌酐测定eGFR的准确性
背景:患者身体质量指数(BMI)过低或过高可能影响估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)的准确性。本研究评估了eGFR方程在BMI范围内的性能。方法:这是一项在瑞典斯德哥尔摩测量GFR (mGFR)的4707名成年人(7503名重复观察)的观察性研究。我们通过使用肌酐(eGFRcr)、胱抑素C (eGFRcys)或两者(egfrcrcys)的验证方程计算了指数eGFR(单位为mL/min/1.73 m2)和非指数eGFR(单位为mL/min)。我们通过BMI中位偏倚、P30(在mGFR的30%内的估计值的百分比)和GFR类别的分类评估了指数化和非指数化mGFR的方程性能,并模拟了选择过滤标记物和指数化对剂量调整或治疗资格的临床决策的影响。结果:平均年龄(SD)为57(16)岁(39%为女性),中位(IQR)索引和非索引mGFR分别为59(39-79)和65(42-87)。结论:在接受GFR测量的北欧个体的临床人群中,指数eGFRcr-cys在BMI谱上比指数eGFRcr更准确,并可能提高治疗决策的分类准确性。使用非索引eGFRcr-cys进一步提高了某些治疗决策的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of The American Society of Nephrology
Journal of The American Society of Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
22.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
492
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (JASN) stands as the preeminent kidney journal globally, offering an exceptional synthesis of cutting-edge basic research, clinical epidemiology, meta-analysis, and relevant editorial content. Representing a comprehensive resource, JASN encompasses clinical research, editorials distilling key findings, perspectives, and timely reviews. Editorials are skillfully crafted to elucidate the essential insights of the parent article, while JASN actively encourages the submission of Letters to the Editor discussing recently published articles. The reviews featured in JASN are consistently erudite and comprehensive, providing thorough coverage of respective fields. Since its inception in July 1990, JASN has been a monthly publication. JASN publishes original research reports and editorial content across a spectrum of basic and clinical science relevant to the broad discipline of nephrology. Topics covered include renal cell biology, developmental biology of the kidney, genetics of kidney disease, cell and transport physiology, hemodynamics and vascular regulation, mechanisms of blood pressure regulation, renal immunology, kidney pathology, pathophysiology of kidney diseases, nephrolithiasis, clinical nephrology (including dialysis and transplantation), and hypertension. Furthermore, articles addressing healthcare policy and care delivery issues relevant to nephrology are warmly welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信