Facilitators and barriers associated with returning to work for cancer survivors: A systematic review

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Jiayi Liu , Jinnan Xiao , Suqi Ou , Jiarui Chen , Siyuan Tang
{"title":"Facilitators and barriers associated with returning to work for cancer survivors: A systematic review","authors":"Jiayi Liu ,&nbsp;Jinnan Xiao ,&nbsp;Suqi Ou ,&nbsp;Jiarui Chen ,&nbsp;Siyuan Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To analyze facilitators and barriers affecting cancer survivors' return to work based on the views of survivors and various stakeholders, using the social ecological model.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Five electronic databases were searched in April 2025. Relevant studies and extracted data were selected by two researchers independently. Qualitative synthesis followed the Joanna Briggs Institute three-step process and drew on the five interrelated layers of the social ecological model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 5535 initial studies, 13 qualitative studies were included. Intrapersonal factors consisted of personal characteristics, disease diagnosis, post-treatment physical symptoms, post-treatment emotional states, the perceived impacts of the disease and treatments on work, understanding of and attitudes toward work, and strategies for coping with return-to-work issues. Interpersonal factors included the opinions of employers and interpersonal relations at work, as well as interpersonal support. Organizational factors consisted of occupational return-to-work arrangements and occupational support. Community factors included community support and public cognition and atmosphere. Public policy factors included the dissemination of related policies, the deficiency of related legislation, and the impacts and implementation criteria of welfare policies. The differences between cancer survivors' and stakeholders' perspectives were compared.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Multiple factors directly or indirectly influence cancer survivors' return-to-work decisions and experience. Cancer survivors should develop their awareness and learn more strategies in dealing with return-to-work problems. Stakeholders should care about the health status of cancer survivors, offering increased understanding and collaboration. Further studies should explore the relationships among the factors. Multi-component interventions are recommended to address return-to-work issues.</div></div><div><h3>Systematic review registration</h3><div>PROSPERO CRD42024555929.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8569,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100734"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2347562525000824","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To analyze facilitators and barriers affecting cancer survivors' return to work based on the views of survivors and various stakeholders, using the social ecological model.

Methods

Five electronic databases were searched in April 2025. Relevant studies and extracted data were selected by two researchers independently. Qualitative synthesis followed the Joanna Briggs Institute three-step process and drew on the five interrelated layers of the social ecological model.

Results

Of 5535 initial studies, 13 qualitative studies were included. Intrapersonal factors consisted of personal characteristics, disease diagnosis, post-treatment physical symptoms, post-treatment emotional states, the perceived impacts of the disease and treatments on work, understanding of and attitudes toward work, and strategies for coping with return-to-work issues. Interpersonal factors included the opinions of employers and interpersonal relations at work, as well as interpersonal support. Organizational factors consisted of occupational return-to-work arrangements and occupational support. Community factors included community support and public cognition and atmosphere. Public policy factors included the dissemination of related policies, the deficiency of related legislation, and the impacts and implementation criteria of welfare policies. The differences between cancer survivors' and stakeholders' perspectives were compared.

Conclusions

Multiple factors directly or indirectly influence cancer survivors' return-to-work decisions and experience. Cancer survivors should develop their awareness and learn more strategies in dealing with return-to-work problems. Stakeholders should care about the health status of cancer survivors, offering increased understanding and collaboration. Further studies should explore the relationships among the factors. Multi-component interventions are recommended to address return-to-work issues.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO CRD42024555929.
癌症幸存者重返工作岗位的促进因素和障碍:系统回顾
目的基于癌症幸存者和各利益相关方的观点,运用社会生态模型分析影响癌症幸存者重返工作岗位的因素和障碍。方法于2025年4月检索5个电子数据库。相关研究和提取的数据由两位研究者独立选择。定性综合遵循乔安娜布里格斯研究所的三步过程,并借鉴了社会生态模型的五个相互关联的层面。结果在5535项初始研究中,纳入了13项定性研究。个人因素包括个人特征、疾病诊断、治疗后身体症状、治疗后情绪状态、疾病和治疗对工作的感知影响、对工作的理解和态度以及应对重返工作问题的策略。人际因素包括雇主的意见、工作中的人际关系以及人际支持。组织因素包括职业重返工作安排和职业支持。社区因素包括社区支持度和公众认知氛围。公共政策因素包括相关政策的传播、相关立法的缺失以及福利政策的影响和实施标准。比较了癌症幸存者和利益相关者观点的差异。结论多种因素直接或间接影响癌症幸存者重返工作岗位的决定和体验。癌症幸存者应该提高他们的意识,学习更多的策略来处理重返工作岗位的问题。利益相关者应该关心癌症幸存者的健康状况,提供更多的理解和合作。进一步的研究应探讨这些因素之间的关系。建议采取多种干预措施来解决重返工作岗位的问题。系统评价注册号prospero CRD42024555929。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
136
审稿时长
31 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信