Anterior Rehabilitation with Basal Implants in Cleft Cases Systematic Review.

IF 0.7 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-25 DOI:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_373_24
Nirav Patel, Kunal Jha, Velusamy Pavethynath, Sindhura Ravi, Siva K Pendyala, Samidha M Shinde, Rahul Tiwari
{"title":"Anterior Rehabilitation with Basal Implants in Cleft Cases Systematic Review.","authors":"Nirav Patel, Kunal Jha, Velusamy Pavethynath, Sindhura Ravi, Siva K Pendyala, Samidha M Shinde, Rahul Tiwari","doi":"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_373_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To carefully examine the literature on anterior rehabilitation with basal implants in cleft patients, including clinical outcomes, success rates, and complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PubMed search was extensive for published research. The inclusion criteria were original research studies on basal implants in anterior cleft rehabilitation, including clinical outcomes, success rates, and complications, with a minimum follow-up period of 6 months. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies assessed the quality of the included studies after data were retrieved and synthesized using a standard form.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review identified four papers that matched the criteria. The trials examined clinical and surgical care, two-stage implant surgery results, and orthodontic treatment with bone grafting and implant implantation. Infection, complication, and success rates were examined across trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The included trials found 100% success with anterior rehabilitation with basal implants for cleft lip and palate. This method is safe and feasible because no infections or problems have been documented. Basal implants in cleft instances should be tested for long-term efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction in well-designed clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":94339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","volume":"17 Suppl 1","pages":"S211-S214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12156530/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_373_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To carefully examine the literature on anterior rehabilitation with basal implants in cleft patients, including clinical outcomes, success rates, and complications.

Methods: A PubMed search was extensive for published research. The inclusion criteria were original research studies on basal implants in anterior cleft rehabilitation, including clinical outcomes, success rates, and complications, with a minimum follow-up period of 6 months. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies assessed the quality of the included studies after data were retrieved and synthesized using a standard form.

Results: The review identified four papers that matched the criteria. The trials examined clinical and surgical care, two-stage implant surgery results, and orthodontic treatment with bone grafting and implant implantation. Infection, complication, and success rates were examined across trials.

Conclusion: The included trials found 100% success with anterior rehabilitation with basal implants for cleft lip and palate. This method is safe and feasible because no infections or problems have been documented. Basal implants in cleft instances should be tested for long-term efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction in well-designed clinical trials.

基础种植体治疗腭裂病例的前路康复。
目的:仔细查阅有关腭裂患者前路种植体康复的文献,包括临床结果、成功率和并发症。方法:在PubMed上广泛检索已发表的研究。纳入标准为基础种植体在前裂康复中的原始研究,包括临床结果、成功率和并发症,随访时间至少为6个月。乔安娜布里格斯研究所(JBI)分析性横断面研究的关键评估清单在数据检索和使用标准表格合成后评估了所纳入研究的质量。结果:综述确定了四篇符合标准的论文。这些试验检查了临床和外科护理、两阶段种植体手术结果以及植骨和种植体种植的正畸治疗。在试验中检查感染、并发症和成功率。结论:所纳入的试验发现,基础种植体治疗唇腭裂的前路康复成功率为100%。这种方法是安全可行的,因为没有感染或问题的记录。在设计良好的临床试验中,对腭裂病例的基础种植体的长期疗效、安全性和患者满意度进行测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信