Nirav Patel, Kunal Jha, Velusamy Pavethynath, Sindhura Ravi, Siva K Pendyala, Samidha M Shinde, Rahul Tiwari
{"title":"Anterior Rehabilitation with Basal Implants in Cleft Cases Systematic Review.","authors":"Nirav Patel, Kunal Jha, Velusamy Pavethynath, Sindhura Ravi, Siva K Pendyala, Samidha M Shinde, Rahul Tiwari","doi":"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_373_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To carefully examine the literature on anterior rehabilitation with basal implants in cleft patients, including clinical outcomes, success rates, and complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PubMed search was extensive for published research. The inclusion criteria were original research studies on basal implants in anterior cleft rehabilitation, including clinical outcomes, success rates, and complications, with a minimum follow-up period of 6 months. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies assessed the quality of the included studies after data were retrieved and synthesized using a standard form.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review identified four papers that matched the criteria. The trials examined clinical and surgical care, two-stage implant surgery results, and orthodontic treatment with bone grafting and implant implantation. Infection, complication, and success rates were examined across trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The included trials found 100% success with anterior rehabilitation with basal implants for cleft lip and palate. This method is safe and feasible because no infections or problems have been documented. Basal implants in cleft instances should be tested for long-term efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction in well-designed clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":94339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","volume":"17 Suppl 1","pages":"S211-S214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12156530/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_373_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To carefully examine the literature on anterior rehabilitation with basal implants in cleft patients, including clinical outcomes, success rates, and complications.
Methods: A PubMed search was extensive for published research. The inclusion criteria were original research studies on basal implants in anterior cleft rehabilitation, including clinical outcomes, success rates, and complications, with a minimum follow-up period of 6 months. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies assessed the quality of the included studies after data were retrieved and synthesized using a standard form.
Results: The review identified four papers that matched the criteria. The trials examined clinical and surgical care, two-stage implant surgery results, and orthodontic treatment with bone grafting and implant implantation. Infection, complication, and success rates were examined across trials.
Conclusion: The included trials found 100% success with anterior rehabilitation with basal implants for cleft lip and palate. This method is safe and feasible because no infections or problems have been documented. Basal implants in cleft instances should be tested for long-term efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction in well-designed clinical trials.