Comparative Analysis of Biomarkers in CAD: Evaluating Homocysteine, Lipid HS-CRP, Apo A, and ADMA.

IF 0.7 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-21 DOI:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1962_24
Sonu Kumar Singh, Roshan Kumar Jha, Ranjit S Ambad, Rakesh Kumar Jha
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Biomarkers in CAD: Evaluating Homocysteine, Lipid HS-CRP, Apo A, and ADMA.","authors":"Sonu Kumar Singh, Roshan Kumar Jha, Ranjit S Ambad, Rakesh Kumar Jha","doi":"10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1962_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Coronary artery disease (CAD), resulting from the narrowing of coronary arteries that supply oxygen to the heart, poses a significant global health challenge.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>To compare the levels of homocysteine, lipid profile, lipid ratios, HS-CRP, ADMA, and apolipoproteins in CAD patients with controls, this chapter analyzes risk factors, biomarkers, and clinical traits linked to coronary artery disease (CAD) through a case-control study involving 200 participants (100 CAD cases and 100 controls). The investigation focuses on demographic variables, traditional risk factors (e.g., hypertension, smoking, alcohol intake), and essential biochemical markers such as lipid profiles, homocysteine, and emerging biomarkers like HS-CRP, ADMA, and apolipoproteins (Apo A1 and Apo B).</p><p><strong>Results and conclusion: </strong>The findings underscore the interplay between traditional and emerging risk factors in CAD progression. LDL, homocysteine, and TC/HDL ratio emerge as robust predictors of CAD risk. The regression model's high explanatory power (R<sup>²</sup> =97.2%) validates these indicators for effective risk assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":94339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","volume":"17 Suppl 1","pages":"S366-S368"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12156636/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1962_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Coronary artery disease (CAD), resulting from the narrowing of coronary arteries that supply oxygen to the heart, poses a significant global health challenge.

Materials and methods: To compare the levels of homocysteine, lipid profile, lipid ratios, HS-CRP, ADMA, and apolipoproteins in CAD patients with controls, this chapter analyzes risk factors, biomarkers, and clinical traits linked to coronary artery disease (CAD) through a case-control study involving 200 participants (100 CAD cases and 100 controls). The investigation focuses on demographic variables, traditional risk factors (e.g., hypertension, smoking, alcohol intake), and essential biochemical markers such as lipid profiles, homocysteine, and emerging biomarkers like HS-CRP, ADMA, and apolipoproteins (Apo A1 and Apo B).

Results and conclusion: The findings underscore the interplay between traditional and emerging risk factors in CAD progression. LDL, homocysteine, and TC/HDL ratio emerge as robust predictors of CAD risk. The regression model's high explanatory power (R² =97.2%) validates these indicators for effective risk assessment.

CAD中生物标志物的比较分析:评估同型半胱氨酸、脂质HS-CRP、载脂蛋白A和ADMA。
导言:冠状动脉疾病(CAD)是由向心脏供氧的冠状动脉狭窄引起的,是一个重大的全球健康挑战。材料和方法:为了比较冠心病患者与对照组的同型半胱氨酸、脂质谱、脂质比、HS-CRP、ADMA和载脂蛋白水平,本章通过一项涉及200名参与者(100名冠心病患者和100名对照组)的病例对照研究,分析了与冠心病(CAD)相关的危险因素、生物标志物和临床特征。调查的重点是人口统计学变量、传统的危险因素(如高血压、吸烟、饮酒)、必要的生化指标(如脂质谱、同型半胱氨酸)和新兴的生物标志物(如HS-CRP、ADMA和载脂蛋白(Apo A1和Apo B))。结果和结论:研究结果强调了冠心病进展中传统和新兴危险因素之间的相互作用。LDL、同型半胱氨酸和TC/HDL比值是CAD风险的可靠预测因子。回归模型的高解释力(R²=97.2%)验证了这些指标是有效的风险评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信