Zhuo Jun Ye, Dan Ni Yang, Yu Jiang, Yu Xuan Xiao, Zhuo Ying Li, Yu Ting Tan, Hui Yun Yuan, Yong Bing Xiang
{"title":"Changes in Esophageal Cancer Survival: A Global Review of Survival Analysis from Cancer Registration Data over the Past Three Decades.","authors":"Zhuo Jun Ye, Dan Ni Yang, Yu Jiang, Yu Xuan Xiao, Zhuo Ying Li, Yu Ting Tan, Hui Yun Yuan, Yong Bing Xiang","doi":"10.3967/bes2025.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe survival trends and global patterns of esophageal cancer (EC) using survival data from population-based cancer registries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, SEER, and SinoMed databases for articles published up to 31 December 2023. Eligible EC survival estimates were evaluated according to country or region, period, sex, age group, pathology, and disease stage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 2010, Jordan exhibited the highest age-standardized 5-year relative survival rates (RSRs)/net survival rates (NSRs) at 41.1% between 2010 and 2014, while India had the lowest, at 4.1%. Survival rates generally improved with diagnostic age across most countries, with significant increases in South Korea and China, of 12.7% and 10.5% between 2000 and 2017, respectively. Survival was higher among women compared to men, ranging from 0.4%-10.9%. Survival rates for adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma were similar, differing by about 4%. In China, the highest age-standardized RSRs/NSRs was 33.4% between 2015 and 2017. Meanwhile, the lowest was 5.3%, in Qidong (Jiangsu province) between 1992-1996.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Global EC survival rates have improved significantly in recent decades, but substantial geographical, sex, and age disparities still exist. In Asia, squamous cell carcinoma demonstrated superior survival rates compared to adenocarcinoma, while the opposite trend was observed in Western countries. Future research should clarify the prognostic factors influencing EC survival and tailor prevention and screening strategies to the changing EC survival patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":93903,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical and environmental sciences : BES","volume":"38 5","pages":"571-584"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical and environmental sciences : BES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3967/bes2025.018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To describe survival trends and global patterns of esophageal cancer (EC) using survival data from population-based cancer registries.
Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, SEER, and SinoMed databases for articles published up to 31 December 2023. Eligible EC survival estimates were evaluated according to country or region, period, sex, age group, pathology, and disease stage.
Results: After 2010, Jordan exhibited the highest age-standardized 5-year relative survival rates (RSRs)/net survival rates (NSRs) at 41.1% between 2010 and 2014, while India had the lowest, at 4.1%. Survival rates generally improved with diagnostic age across most countries, with significant increases in South Korea and China, of 12.7% and 10.5% between 2000 and 2017, respectively. Survival was higher among women compared to men, ranging from 0.4%-10.9%. Survival rates for adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma were similar, differing by about 4%. In China, the highest age-standardized RSRs/NSRs was 33.4% between 2015 and 2017. Meanwhile, the lowest was 5.3%, in Qidong (Jiangsu province) between 1992-1996.
Conclusion: Global EC survival rates have improved significantly in recent decades, but substantial geographical, sex, and age disparities still exist. In Asia, squamous cell carcinoma demonstrated superior survival rates compared to adenocarcinoma, while the opposite trend was observed in Western countries. Future research should clarify the prognostic factors influencing EC survival and tailor prevention and screening strategies to the changing EC survival patterns.
目的:利用基于人群的癌症登记处的生存数据来描述食管癌(EC)的生存趋势和全球模式。方法:系统检索PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science、SEER和SinoMed数据库,检索截至2023年12月31日发表的文章。根据国家或地区、时期、性别、年龄组、病理和疾病分期评估合格的EC生存估计。结果:2010年之后,约旦的5年标准化相对生存率(RSRs)/净生存率(NSRs)最高,为41.1%,而印度最低,为4.1%。在大多数国家,生存率随着诊断年龄的增长而普遍提高,韩国和中国在2000年至2017年期间分别显著提高了12.7%和10.5%。女性的生存率高于男性,介于0.4%-10.9%之间。腺癌和鳞状细胞癌的存活率相似,相差约4%。在中国,2015年至2017年间,年龄标准化RSRs/NSRs最高为33.4%。1992-1996年间,最低的是江苏启东的5.3%。结论:近几十年来,全球EC患者的生存率有了显著提高,但仍存在明显的地理、性别和年龄差异。在亚洲,与腺癌相比,鳞状细胞癌表现出更高的生存率,而在西方国家观察到相反的趋势。未来的研究应明确影响EC生存的预后因素,并根据EC生存模式的变化制定预防和筛查策略。