Contemporary Results of Mechanical Thrombectomy and Impact of First-Line Technique on Outcome: The INSPIRE-S Global Registry.

Marc Rodrigo-Gisbert, Marc Ribo, Markus Möhlenbruch, Sanjeev Nayak, Christophe Cognard, Jens Fiehler, Luc Defreyne, Eva González, Pedro Vega, Anderson Tsang, David Orion, Piotr Piasecki, Manuel Ribeiro, Andrés Fernández-Prieto, Jean C Gentric, Oscar Vila, Samer Elsheikh, Charlotte Barbier, Paolo Machi, Luc Stockx, Vincent Costalat, Pedro Lylyk, Alejandro González, Konstantinos Lagios, Olivier Naggara, Laurent Spelle, Jose A Larrea, Omer F Eker, Kyriakos Lobotesis, Riitta Rautio, Pasquale Mordasini
{"title":"Contemporary Results of Mechanical Thrombectomy and Impact of First-Line Technique on Outcome: The INSPIRE-S Global Registry.","authors":"Marc Rodrigo-Gisbert, Marc Ribo, Markus Möhlenbruch, Sanjeev Nayak, Christophe Cognard, Jens Fiehler, Luc Defreyne, Eva González, Pedro Vega, Anderson Tsang, David Orion, Piotr Piasecki, Manuel Ribeiro, Andrés Fernández-Prieto, Jean C Gentric, Oscar Vila, Samer Elsheikh, Charlotte Barbier, Paolo Machi, Luc Stockx, Vincent Costalat, Pedro Lylyk, Alejandro González, Konstantinos Lagios, Olivier Naggara, Laurent Spelle, Jose A Larrea, Omer F Eker, Kyriakos Lobotesis, Riitta Rautio, Pasquale Mordasini","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Three mechanical thrombectomy (MT) techniques are predominantly used for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS): stent retriever (SR) alone, aspiration (ASP) alone, and combination therapy (CT) with a general goal of achieving first-pass reperfusion (FPR: eTICI≥2c). Factors influencing FPR and the relative efficacy and safety of the 3 techniques are loosely understood.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>INSPIRE-S is a prospective, imaging core-lab adjudicated, safety clinical events committee adjudicated, global registry of AIS patients treated with Medtronic Neurovascular devices on the first pass and grouped according to first-pass MT technique.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From May 2020 through December 2022, 802 patients (29 sites, 13 countries) who met eligibility criteria were enrolled in the INSPIRE-S registry and were grouped by first-pass MT technique (259 in SR, 146 in ASP, and 397 in CT). Overall, MCA-M1/M2 occlusions were present in 76.1% of patients, and the mean number of passes was 1.9±1.3. Among the techniques, the primary endpoint, good clinical outcome (mRS≤ 2 or mRS≤ pre-stroke mRS) at 90 days was achieved in 60.5% in SR, 52.8% in ASP, and 56.6% in CT (p>0.05 in unadjusted and adjusted analyses). The FPR rates were 48.6% in SR, 39.9% in ASP, and 47.5% in CT (p>0.05), and final complete (eTICI≥2c) reperfusion rates were 77.4% in SR, 70.6% in ASP, and 72.0% in CT (p>0.05 in adjusted analyses). In subgroup analyses by occlusion location, ASP had the lowest FPR in the ICA (p=0.003), while ASP was more frequently employed than SR for ICA (p=0.03). There was no significant difference in FPR among techniques when patients were treated with site-preferred technique. The overall rates of CEC-adjudicated all-cause mortality (14.0%) and sICH (1.5%) did not significantly differ among the techniques.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The primary results of real-world data from INSPIRE-S showed overall high rates of first pass complete reperfusion and final clinical outcomes that were similar among the 3 MT techniques.</p><p><strong>Abbreviations: </strong>AIS= Acute Ischemic Stroke; CT= Combined technique; ASP= Aspiration alone; LVO= Large vessel occlusion; MT= Mechanical Thrombectomy; SR= Stent Retriever alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8848","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Three mechanical thrombectomy (MT) techniques are predominantly used for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS): stent retriever (SR) alone, aspiration (ASP) alone, and combination therapy (CT) with a general goal of achieving first-pass reperfusion (FPR: eTICI≥2c). Factors influencing FPR and the relative efficacy and safety of the 3 techniques are loosely understood.

Materials and methods: INSPIRE-S is a prospective, imaging core-lab adjudicated, safety clinical events committee adjudicated, global registry of AIS patients treated with Medtronic Neurovascular devices on the first pass and grouped according to first-pass MT technique.

Results: From May 2020 through December 2022, 802 patients (29 sites, 13 countries) who met eligibility criteria were enrolled in the INSPIRE-S registry and were grouped by first-pass MT technique (259 in SR, 146 in ASP, and 397 in CT). Overall, MCA-M1/M2 occlusions were present in 76.1% of patients, and the mean number of passes was 1.9±1.3. Among the techniques, the primary endpoint, good clinical outcome (mRS≤ 2 or mRS≤ pre-stroke mRS) at 90 days was achieved in 60.5% in SR, 52.8% in ASP, and 56.6% in CT (p>0.05 in unadjusted and adjusted analyses). The FPR rates were 48.6% in SR, 39.9% in ASP, and 47.5% in CT (p>0.05), and final complete (eTICI≥2c) reperfusion rates were 77.4% in SR, 70.6% in ASP, and 72.0% in CT (p>0.05 in adjusted analyses). In subgroup analyses by occlusion location, ASP had the lowest FPR in the ICA (p=0.003), while ASP was more frequently employed than SR for ICA (p=0.03). There was no significant difference in FPR among techniques when patients were treated with site-preferred technique. The overall rates of CEC-adjudicated all-cause mortality (14.0%) and sICH (1.5%) did not significantly differ among the techniques.

Conclusions: The primary results of real-world data from INSPIRE-S showed overall high rates of first pass complete reperfusion and final clinical outcomes that were similar among the 3 MT techniques.

Abbreviations: AIS= Acute Ischemic Stroke; CT= Combined technique; ASP= Aspiration alone; LVO= Large vessel occlusion; MT= Mechanical Thrombectomy; SR= Stent Retriever alone.

当代机械取栓的结果和一线技术对结果的影响:INSPIRE-S全球注册。
背景和目的:三种机械取栓(MT)技术主要用于治疗急性缺血性卒中(AIS):单独支架取栓(SR)、单独抽吸(ASP)和联合治疗(CT),其总体目标是实现首次再灌注(FPR: eTICI≥2c)。影响FPR的因素以及3种技术的相对疗效和安全性尚不清楚。材料和方法:INSPIRE-S是一项前瞻性的、影像核心实验室评审的、安全临床事件委员会评审的、首次使用美敦力神经血管设备治疗的AIS患者的全球注册研究,并根据首次使用MT技术进行分组。结果:从2020年5月到2022年12月,802名符合资格标准的患者(29个地点,13个国家)被纳入INSPIRE-S注册表,并通过首次通过MT技术进行分组(SR 259例,ASP 146例,CT 397例)。总体而言,76.1%的患者存在MCA-M1/M2闭塞,平均通过次数为1.9±1.3次。在这些技术中,主要终点,90天的良好临床结局(mRS≤2或mRS≤卒中前mRS)在SR中达到60.5%,在ASP中达到52.8%,在CT中达到56.6%(未调整和调整分析的p < 0.05)。SR组FPR为48.6%,ASP组为39.9%,CT组为47.5% (p>0.05),最终完全(eTICI≥2c)再灌注率SR组为77.4%,ASP组为70.6%,CT组为72.0% (p>0.05)。在按咬合位置进行的亚组分析中,ASP在ICA中的FPR最低(p=0.003),而ASP在ICA中的使用频率高于SR (p=0.03)。采用部位优选技术治疗患者的FPR无显著差异。cec判定的全因死亡率(14.0%)和sICH(1.5%)的总比率在两种技术之间没有显著差异。结论:来自INSPIRE-S的真实世界数据的主要结果显示,在3种MT技术中,首次完全再灌注的总体发生率很高,最终临床结果相似。缩写:AIS=急性缺血性中风;CT=联合技术;ASP=单纯的愿望;LVO=大血管闭塞;MT=机械取栓;SR=单独支架回收器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信