Mamadou Alpha Diallo, Ibrahima M Ndiaye, Djiby Sow, Mame Cheikh Seck, Khadim Diongue, Mariama Touré, Katerine E Battle, Bassirou Ngom, Mouhamad Sy, Amy Gaye, Yaye Dié Ndiaye, Mamane Nassirou Garba, Aida Sadikh Badiane, Aita Sene, Medoune Ndiop, Jules François Gomis, Sarah K Volkman, Doudou Sene, Bronwyn L MacInnis, Ibrahima Diallo, Mouhamadou Ndiaye, Dyann F Wirth, Daouda Ndiaye
{"title":"RDT performance through high-throughput bead-based antigen detection during malaria school survey in Senegal.","authors":"Mamadou Alpha Diallo, Ibrahima M Ndiaye, Djiby Sow, Mame Cheikh Seck, Khadim Diongue, Mariama Touré, Katerine E Battle, Bassirou Ngom, Mouhamad Sy, Amy Gaye, Yaye Dié Ndiaye, Mamane Nassirou Garba, Aida Sadikh Badiane, Aita Sene, Medoune Ndiop, Jules François Gomis, Sarah K Volkman, Doudou Sene, Bronwyn L MacInnis, Ibrahima Diallo, Mouhamadou Ndiaye, Dyann F Wirth, Daouda Ndiaye","doi":"10.3389/fpara.2025.1598280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDTs) remain the frontline tool for malaria diagnosis, but their performance in detecting low-density infections is variable and poorly characterized at the population level.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of HRP2-based RDTs by integrating high-throughput bead-based HRP2 quantification into school-based malaria surveys.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted in three Senegalese districts (Diourbel, Tambacounda, and Kédougou), enrolling 3,748 school-aged children. All participants were tested using RDTs, and dried blood spots were analyzed with a multiplex bead-based HRP2 assay. A Gaussian mixture model was used to classify HRP2 positivity, and logistic regression assessed the relationship between HRP2 concentration and RDT outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall RDT positivity rate was 7.2%, with marked heterogeneity across districts (Diourbel: 3.0%, Kédougou: 15.9%, Tambacounda: 7.6%). HRP2 concentration was the strongest predictor of RDT positivity (aOR: 14.55 per log<sub>10</sub> increase, 95% CI: 11.14-19.00). RDT limits of detection (LOD<sub>95</sub>) varied significantly: 3.9 ng/mL in Tambacounda, 121.2 ng/mL in Kédougou, and 204.3 ng/mL in Diourbel.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RDTs remain a useful surveillance tool, particularly in moderate- to high-transmission settings. However, reduced sensitivity at lower antigen concentrations in hypo-endemic areas highlights the value of complementary high-sensitivity assays for elimination-focused strategies. Future research should explore the application of these integrated diagnostic approaches in regions without seasonal malaria chemoprophylaxis intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":73098,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in parasitology","volume":"4 ","pages":"1598280"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12159022/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in parasitology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpara.2025.1598280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDTs) remain the frontline tool for malaria diagnosis, but their performance in detecting low-density infections is variable and poorly characterized at the population level.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of HRP2-based RDTs by integrating high-throughput bead-based HRP2 quantification into school-based malaria surveys.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in three Senegalese districts (Diourbel, Tambacounda, and Kédougou), enrolling 3,748 school-aged children. All participants were tested using RDTs, and dried blood spots were analyzed with a multiplex bead-based HRP2 assay. A Gaussian mixture model was used to classify HRP2 positivity, and logistic regression assessed the relationship between HRP2 concentration and RDT outcome.
Results: The overall RDT positivity rate was 7.2%, with marked heterogeneity across districts (Diourbel: 3.0%, Kédougou: 15.9%, Tambacounda: 7.6%). HRP2 concentration was the strongest predictor of RDT positivity (aOR: 14.55 per log10 increase, 95% CI: 11.14-19.00). RDT limits of detection (LOD95) varied significantly: 3.9 ng/mL in Tambacounda, 121.2 ng/mL in Kédougou, and 204.3 ng/mL in Diourbel.
Conclusion: RDTs remain a useful surveillance tool, particularly in moderate- to high-transmission settings. However, reduced sensitivity at lower antigen concentrations in hypo-endemic areas highlights the value of complementary high-sensitivity assays for elimination-focused strategies. Future research should explore the application of these integrated diagnostic approaches in regions without seasonal malaria chemoprophylaxis intervention.