Application Value of Enhanced CT Imaging Features in Predicting Vessels Encapsulating Tumor Clusters (VETC) Positivity in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Qianjiang Ding, Xi Deng, Jingfeng Huang, Ruixue Zhang, Ting Liu, Jianhua Wang, Yutao Wang
{"title":"Application Value of Enhanced CT Imaging Features in Predicting Vessels Encapsulating Tumor Clusters (VETC) Positivity in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.","authors":"Qianjiang Ding, Xi Deng, Jingfeng Huang, Ruixue Zhang, Ting Liu, Jianhua Wang, Yutao Wang","doi":"10.2174/0115734056361565250530050624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>VETC-positive has emerged as a novel predictor of HCC for poor prognosis. Enhanced CT is one of the most common diagnostic methods, which can indicate VETC positivity, providing important evidence for the diagnosis and treatment of VETC-positive HCC.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to investigate the clinical and preoperative enhanced CT imaging characteristics and diagnostic value of VETCpositive hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical, pathological, and imaging data of 53 HCC patients from the First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University between June 2019 and September 2022. According to pathological results, patients were categorized into 11 VETC-positive and 42 VETC-negative cases. Observational parameters included: (1) Clinical indicators: gender, age, history of hepatitis B virus infection, preoperative AFP, TNM staging, and preoperative biochemical and coagulation laboratory tests, including Alb, AST, ALT, TBil, DB, PT, TT, and INR. Additionally, pathological results such as histological grading, microvascular invasion (MVI), satellite nodules, neural invasion, and postoperative recurrence were analyzed. (2) Preoperative enhanced CT observational indicators: maximum tumor diameter, intrahepatic growth, irregular tumor margins, peritumoral hepatic parenchymal enhancement, mosaic structure, non-ring-like arterial phase hyperenhancement, marked heterogeneous enhancement, non-peripheral washout, absence of enhancing capsule, enhancing/clear capsule, intratumoral arteries, intratumoral necrosis, along with measurement of unenhanced CT values and enhanced CT values at various phases, calculating enhancement ratios (enhancement ratio = enhanced CT value - unenhanced CT value / unenhanced CT value). Quantitative data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (x̅±s), with intergroup comparisons conducted using the t-test; categorical variables were compared using the χ<sup>2</sup> test or Fisher's exact test. Multivariate analysis employed stepwise regression for logistic regression, incorporating clinical and imaging characteristics into the logistic regression equation. Based on logistic regression results, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted, calculating the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Analysis on survival was performed using Kaplan-Meier methods and log-rank tests, aiming survival curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>(1) Clinical characteristics of VETC-positive versus VETC-negative patients: Preoperative AFP levels showed statistical significance (P=0.037), while no significant differences were observed in gender, age, Alb, TB, DB, AST, ALT, PT, TT, and INR between VETC-positive and VETCnegative patients (P>0.05). (2) Enhanced CT imaging features of VETC-positive versus VETC-negative patients: Intratumoral necrosis showed statistical significance (P<0.05), with intratumoral arteries being 63.6% (7/11) in the positive group compared to 42.9% (18/42) in the negative group. No significant differences were found in maximum tumor diameter, irregular tumor margins, peritumoral hepatic parenchymal enhancement, mosaic structure, non-ring-like arterial phase hyperenhancement, marked heterogeneous enhancement, non-peripheral washout, absence of enhancing capsule, enhancing capsule, intratumoral arteries, as well as unenhanced CT values and enhanced CT values at various phases, arterial phase enhancement ratio, portal phase enhancement ratio, and delayed phase enhancement ratio (P>0.05). (3) Multivariate analysis influencing VETC positivity: Arterial phase CT values (HU) (OR=0.937, P=0.029), intratumoral arteries (OR=9.452, P=0.021), and intratumoral necrosis (OR=0.013, P=0.003) were identified as independent risk factors for VETC positivity (Odds Ratio=0.937, 9.452, 0.013, 95% CI=0.883-0.993, 1.4-63.823, 0.001-0.223, P<0.05). The AUC of VETC was 0.863 (95% CI: 0.728-0.997), with a sensitivity of 81.8% and specificity of 88.1%. (4) Postoperative early tumor recurrence in VETC-positive and VETC-negative patients: All 53 patients were followed up, with an average tumor recurrence time of 11 (4-20) months, showing significant differences (P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>As one of the routine and preferred methods for HCC examination, enhanced CT plays a pivotal role in diagnosis, staging, and post-treatment evaluation. Combining preoperative enhanced arterial phase CT values, intratumoral arteries, and intratumoral necrosis can highly indicate VETC positivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":54215,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Imaging Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Imaging Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734056361565250530050624","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: VETC-positive has emerged as a novel predictor of HCC for poor prognosis. Enhanced CT is one of the most common diagnostic methods, which can indicate VETC positivity, providing important evidence for the diagnosis and treatment of VETC-positive HCC.

Objective: The objective of this study is to investigate the clinical and preoperative enhanced CT imaging characteristics and diagnostic value of VETCpositive hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical, pathological, and imaging data of 53 HCC patients from the First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University between June 2019 and September 2022. According to pathological results, patients were categorized into 11 VETC-positive and 42 VETC-negative cases. Observational parameters included: (1) Clinical indicators: gender, age, history of hepatitis B virus infection, preoperative AFP, TNM staging, and preoperative biochemical and coagulation laboratory tests, including Alb, AST, ALT, TBil, DB, PT, TT, and INR. Additionally, pathological results such as histological grading, microvascular invasion (MVI), satellite nodules, neural invasion, and postoperative recurrence were analyzed. (2) Preoperative enhanced CT observational indicators: maximum tumor diameter, intrahepatic growth, irregular tumor margins, peritumoral hepatic parenchymal enhancement, mosaic structure, non-ring-like arterial phase hyperenhancement, marked heterogeneous enhancement, non-peripheral washout, absence of enhancing capsule, enhancing/clear capsule, intratumoral arteries, intratumoral necrosis, along with measurement of unenhanced CT values and enhanced CT values at various phases, calculating enhancement ratios (enhancement ratio = enhanced CT value - unenhanced CT value / unenhanced CT value). Quantitative data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (x̅±s), with intergroup comparisons conducted using the t-test; categorical variables were compared using the χ2 test or Fisher's exact test. Multivariate analysis employed stepwise regression for logistic regression, incorporating clinical and imaging characteristics into the logistic regression equation. Based on logistic regression results, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted, calculating the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Analysis on survival was performed using Kaplan-Meier methods and log-rank tests, aiming survival curves.

Results: (1) Clinical characteristics of VETC-positive versus VETC-negative patients: Preoperative AFP levels showed statistical significance (P=0.037), while no significant differences were observed in gender, age, Alb, TB, DB, AST, ALT, PT, TT, and INR between VETC-positive and VETCnegative patients (P>0.05). (2) Enhanced CT imaging features of VETC-positive versus VETC-negative patients: Intratumoral necrosis showed statistical significance (P<0.05), with intratumoral arteries being 63.6% (7/11) in the positive group compared to 42.9% (18/42) in the negative group. No significant differences were found in maximum tumor diameter, irregular tumor margins, peritumoral hepatic parenchymal enhancement, mosaic structure, non-ring-like arterial phase hyperenhancement, marked heterogeneous enhancement, non-peripheral washout, absence of enhancing capsule, enhancing capsule, intratumoral arteries, as well as unenhanced CT values and enhanced CT values at various phases, arterial phase enhancement ratio, portal phase enhancement ratio, and delayed phase enhancement ratio (P>0.05). (3) Multivariate analysis influencing VETC positivity: Arterial phase CT values (HU) (OR=0.937, P=0.029), intratumoral arteries (OR=9.452, P=0.021), and intratumoral necrosis (OR=0.013, P=0.003) were identified as independent risk factors for VETC positivity (Odds Ratio=0.937, 9.452, 0.013, 95% CI=0.883-0.993, 1.4-63.823, 0.001-0.223, P<0.05). The AUC of VETC was 0.863 (95% CI: 0.728-0.997), with a sensitivity of 81.8% and specificity of 88.1%. (4) Postoperative early tumor recurrence in VETC-positive and VETC-negative patients: All 53 patients were followed up, with an average tumor recurrence time of 11 (4-20) months, showing significant differences (P<0.05).

Conclusion: As one of the routine and preferred methods for HCC examination, enhanced CT plays a pivotal role in diagnosis, staging, and post-treatment evaluation. Combining preoperative enhanced arterial phase CT values, intratumoral arteries, and intratumoral necrosis can highly indicate VETC positivity.

增强CT影像特征在预测肝细胞癌血管包封肿瘤簇(VETC)阳性中的应用价值。
背景:vetc阳性已成为HCC预后不良的一种新的预测因子。增强CT是最常见的诊断方法之一,可提示VETC阳性,为VETC阳性HCC的诊断和治疗提供重要依据。目的:探讨vetc阳性肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的临床及术前增强CT影像学特征及诊断价值。方法:回顾性分析宁波大学附属第一医院2019年6月至2022年9月收治的53例HCC患者的临床、病理及影像学资料。根据病理结果将患者分为vetc阳性11例和vetc阴性42例。观察参数包括:(1)临床指标:性别、年龄、乙型肝炎病毒感染史、术前AFP、TNM分期、术前生化及凝血实验室检查,包括Alb、AST、ALT、TBil、DB、PT、TT、INR。此外,还分析了病理结果,如组织学分级、微血管侵犯(MVI)、卫星结节、神经侵犯和术后复发。(2)术前增强CT观察指标:最大肿瘤直径、肝内生长、肿瘤边缘不规则、瘤周肝实质增强、马赛克结构、非环状动脉期高增强、明显非均匀增强、非外周洗脱、增强包膜缺失、增强/透明包膜、瘤内动脉、瘤内坏死,并测量各期CT非增强值和增强值。计算增强比(增强比=增强值-未增强值/未增强值)。定量资料以均数±标准差(x′±s)表示,组间比较采用t检验;分类变量比较采用χ2检验或Fisher精确检验。多因素分析采用逐步回归进行logistic回归,将临床和影像学特征纳入logistic回归方程。根据logistic回归结果绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,计算曲线下面积(AUC)、敏感性、特异性及其95%置信区间(CI)。针对生存曲线,采用Kaplan-Meier法和log-rank检验进行生存分析。结果:(1)vetc阳性与vetc阴性患者临床特征:vetc阳性与vetc阴性患者术前AFP水平差异有统计学意义(P=0.037),而vetc阳性与vetc阴性患者性别、年龄、Alb、TB、DB、AST、ALT、PT、TT、INR差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。(2) vetc阳性与vetc阴性患者CT增强影像学表现:瘤内坏死差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。(3)影响VETC阳性的多因素分析:动脉期CT值(HU) (OR=0.937, P=0.029)、瘤内动脉(OR=9.452, P=0.021)、瘤内坏死(OR=0.013, P=0.003)是VETC阳性的独立危险因素(优势比=0.937,9.452,0.013,95% CI=0.883-0.993, 1.4-63.823, 0.001-0.223, P)。增强CT作为HCC检查的常规和首选方法之一,在HCC的诊断、分期和治疗后评价中起着举足轻重的作用。结合术前增强动脉期CT值、瘤内动脉、瘤内坏死高度提示VETC阳性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
246
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Medical Imaging Reviews publishes frontier review articles, original research articles, drug clinical trial studies and guest edited thematic issues on all the latest advances on medical imaging dedicated to clinical research. All relevant areas are covered by the journal, including advances in the diagnosis, instrumentation and therapeutic applications related to all modern medical imaging techniques. The journal is essential reading for all clinicians and researchers involved in medical imaging and diagnosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信