The impact of mild cognitive impairment on healthcare utilization and costs: A UK Biobank study.

IF 4 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Craig Ritchie, Dominic Trepel, Sophie Edwards, Julie Hviid Hahn-Pedersen, Mei Sum Chan, Benjamin D Bray, Alice Clark, Christian Ahmad Wichmann, Marc Evans
{"title":"The impact of mild cognitive impairment on healthcare utilization and costs: A UK Biobank study.","authors":"Craig Ritchie, Dominic Trepel, Sophie Edwards, Julie Hviid Hahn-Pedersen, Mei Sum Chan, Benjamin D Bray, Alice Clark, Christian Ahmad Wichmann, Marc Evans","doi":"10.1002/dad2.70065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is common in older adults, but the burden on patients and health systems is not well understood. We aimed to estimate the impact of MCI on healthcare utilization and costs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a matched cohort study in UK Biobank comparing healthcare costs and Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia incidence rates in participants with MCI to propensity score-matched participants without MCI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 164,508 eligible participants, 6605(4%) had cognitive testing scores consistent with MCI. Ten-year inpatient costs were 7.6% higher in MCI versus matched no-MCI participants, while 6-year primary care costs were 9.1% higher. Among MCI participants, AD dementia incidence rates were substantially higher than in non-MCI participants (7.2 5-year incidence rate ratio 95% CI: 3.3 to 15.7), and eventual AD dementia accrued higher additional inpatient costs (mean £20,199) over 10 years.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>MCI is characterized by modestly higher healthcare utilization and costs. Subsequent AD dementia diagnosis was strongly associated with costs.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Baseline cognitive tests identified individuals with all-cause MCI in the UK Biobank.We compared individuals with MCI to propensity score-matched participants without MCI.Inpatient costs were 7.6% higher over 10 years, and primary care costs were 9.1% higher over 6 years for participants with MCI.AD dementia incidence rate ratio was 7.2 higher in participants with MCI.Among MCI participants, eventual AD dementia was a key driver of costs resulting in higher inpatient costs (mean £20,199) over 10 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":53226,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring","volume":"17 2","pages":"e70065"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12159762/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.70065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is common in older adults, but the burden on patients and health systems is not well understood. We aimed to estimate the impact of MCI on healthcare utilization and costs.

Methods: This was a matched cohort study in UK Biobank comparing healthcare costs and Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia incidence rates in participants with MCI to propensity score-matched participants without MCI.

Results: Of 164,508 eligible participants, 6605(4%) had cognitive testing scores consistent with MCI. Ten-year inpatient costs were 7.6% higher in MCI versus matched no-MCI participants, while 6-year primary care costs were 9.1% higher. Among MCI participants, AD dementia incidence rates were substantially higher than in non-MCI participants (7.2 5-year incidence rate ratio 95% CI: 3.3 to 15.7), and eventual AD dementia accrued higher additional inpatient costs (mean £20,199) over 10 years.

Discussion: MCI is characterized by modestly higher healthcare utilization and costs. Subsequent AD dementia diagnosis was strongly associated with costs.

Highlights: Baseline cognitive tests identified individuals with all-cause MCI in the UK Biobank.We compared individuals with MCI to propensity score-matched participants without MCI.Inpatient costs were 7.6% higher over 10 years, and primary care costs were 9.1% higher over 6 years for participants with MCI.AD dementia incidence rate ratio was 7.2 higher in participants with MCI.Among MCI participants, eventual AD dementia was a key driver of costs resulting in higher inpatient costs (mean £20,199) over 10 years.

轻度认知障碍对医疗保健利用和成本的影响:一项英国生物银行研究。
轻度认知障碍(MCI)在老年人中很常见,但对患者和卫生系统的负担尚不清楚。我们的目的是估计MCI对医疗保健利用和成本的影响。方法:这是英国生物银行的一项匹配队列研究,比较了MCI患者的医疗费用和阿尔茨海默病(AD)痴呆发病率与倾向评分匹配的无MCI患者的发病率。结果:在164,508名符合条件的参与者中,6605名(4%)的认知测试得分与MCI一致。MCI患者10年住院费用比非MCI患者高7.6%,而6年初级保健费用比非MCI患者高9.1%。在MCI参与者中,AD痴呆的发病率明显高于非MCI参与者(7.2)(5年发病率比95% CI: 3.3至15.7),并且最终的AD痴呆在10年内累积了更高的额外住院费用(平均20,199英镑)。讨论:MCI的特点是医疗保健利用率和成本略高。随后的阿尔茨海默病痴呆诊断与费用密切相关。重点:基线认知测试确定了英国生物银行中患有全因轻度认知障碍的个体。我们将患有轻度认知障碍的个体与没有轻度认知障碍的倾向得分匹配的参与者进行了比较。患有轻度认知损伤的参与者,住院费用在10年内高出7.6%,初级保健费用在6年内高出9.1%。轻度认知障碍患者AD痴呆的发病率比轻度认知障碍患者高7.2。在MCI参与者中,最终的AD痴呆是导致10年内住院费用增加的关键驱动因素(平均20199英镑)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
7.50%
发文量
101
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Alzheimer''s & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring (DADM) is an open access, peer-reviewed, journal from the Alzheimer''s Association® that will publish new research that reports the discovery, development and validation of instruments, technologies, algorithms, and innovative processes. Papers will cover a range of topics interested in the early and accurate detection of individuals with memory complaints and/or among asymptomatic individuals at elevated risk for various forms of memory disorders. The expectation for published papers will be to translate fundamental knowledge about the neurobiology of the disease into practical reports that describe both the conceptual and methodological aspects of the submitted scientific inquiry. Published topics will explore the development of biomarkers, surrogate markers, and conceptual/methodological challenges. Publication priority will be given to papers that 1) describe putative surrogate markers that accurately track disease progression, 2) biomarkers that fulfill international regulatory requirements, 3) reports from large, well-characterized population-based cohorts that comprise the heterogeneity and diversity of asymptomatic individuals and 4) algorithmic development that considers multi-marker arrays (e.g., integrated-omics, genetics, biofluids, imaging, etc.) and advanced computational analytics and technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信