Simon K-H Chow PhD , Joshua P. Rainey MD , Michael A. Mont MD , Lynne P. Jones PhD , Stuart B. Goodman MD, PhD
{"title":"The Role of Cell Therapies for the Treatment of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head","authors":"Simon K-H Chow PhD , Joshua P. Rainey MD , Michael A. Mont MD , Lynne P. Jones PhD , Stuart B. Goodman MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2025.06.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Osteonecrosis of the femoral head<span> (ONFH) can cause pain, diminished function, and eventual articular collapse, disproportionately impacting younger patients. Core decompression (CD) is used to halt or at least delay postcollapse disease in patients who suffer from ONFH, but it can have variable outcomes. Orthobiologics are cellular therapies, growth factors, and biomaterial substances obtained from human cells and tissue that promote biological healing and have recently gained attention in the treatment of osteonecrosis. In this review, the role of orthobiologics in the treatment of osteonecrosis is discussed.</span></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We reviewed the existing literature regarding orthobiologics in the treatment of precollapse ONFH. A total of 11 studies were included, consisting of six randomized controlled trials and five retrospective reviews. The included literature was obtained through a PubMed query of all studies from 1990 to 2024 that evaluated the role of ancillary cell-based therapies in the treatment of precollapse ONFH. Level IV and non-human studies were not included.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><span>There were seven studies that supported the use of orthobiologics as an augmentation strategy to CD in terms of radiographic outcomes (i.e., prevention of femoral head collapse), clinical symptoms, or conversion to </span>total hip arthroplasty. There were four studies (one retrospective review and three randomized controlled trials) that found no clinical or radiographic difference in collapse progression in patients who received CD versus CD along with an orthobiologic augmentation strategy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In summary, further adequately powered, multicenter, blinded, randomized controlled trials are necessary. In addition, many of the studies had other limitations, including a large variability in mesenchymal cell content and standardization. Although the current literature regarding orthobiologic augmentation in the treatment of precollapse ONFH appears promising, further investigation is necessary to conclude its efficacy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":"40 10","pages":"Pages S46-S50"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883540325006783","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) can cause pain, diminished function, and eventual articular collapse, disproportionately impacting younger patients. Core decompression (CD) is used to halt or at least delay postcollapse disease in patients who suffer from ONFH, but it can have variable outcomes. Orthobiologics are cellular therapies, growth factors, and biomaterial substances obtained from human cells and tissue that promote biological healing and have recently gained attention in the treatment of osteonecrosis. In this review, the role of orthobiologics in the treatment of osteonecrosis is discussed.
Methods
We reviewed the existing literature regarding orthobiologics in the treatment of precollapse ONFH. A total of 11 studies were included, consisting of six randomized controlled trials and five retrospective reviews. The included literature was obtained through a PubMed query of all studies from 1990 to 2024 that evaluated the role of ancillary cell-based therapies in the treatment of precollapse ONFH. Level IV and non-human studies were not included.
Results
There were seven studies that supported the use of orthobiologics as an augmentation strategy to CD in terms of radiographic outcomes (i.e., prevention of femoral head collapse), clinical symptoms, or conversion to total hip arthroplasty. There were four studies (one retrospective review and three randomized controlled trials) that found no clinical or radiographic difference in collapse progression in patients who received CD versus CD along with an orthobiologic augmentation strategy.
Conclusions
In summary, further adequately powered, multicenter, blinded, randomized controlled trials are necessary. In addition, many of the studies had other limitations, including a large variability in mesenchymal cell content and standardization. Although the current literature regarding orthobiologic augmentation in the treatment of precollapse ONFH appears promising, further investigation is necessary to conclude its efficacy.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Arthroplasty brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement. This peer-reviewed journal publishes original research and manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas relating to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with clinical series and experience, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, metallurgy, biologic response to arthroplasty materials in vivo and in vitro.