Graduate Medical Education Fellowships Versus Specialty Society Curriculum: A Comparative Study on Alumni Outcomes and Academic Pursuits in Wilderness Medicine.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Stephanie Lareau, Pavel Diaz, Alec M Chan-Golston, Susanne Spano
{"title":"Graduate Medical Education Fellowships Versus Specialty Society Curriculum: A Comparative Study on Alumni Outcomes and Academic Pursuits in Wilderness Medicine.","authors":"Stephanie Lareau, Pavel Diaz, Alec M Chan-Golston, Susanne Spano","doi":"10.1177/10806032251345770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction-Wilderness medicine (WM) is a growing field offering advanced training and recognition through graduate medical education (GME) WM fellowships and the Fellow of the Academy of Wilderness Medicine (FAWM) professional designation. GME fellowships, introduced in 2004, provide immersive, structured training and experiential learning opportunities. The FAWM designation, established in 2005, is earned through approved educational activities. This study compared alumni outcomes between these pathways.Methods-A cross-sectional survey was conducted among GME fellowship graduates and FAWM recipients. Inclusion criteria were GME fellowship alumni or individuals with FAWM recognition. Exclusion criteria included incomplete surveys. Respondents were surveyed on demographics, academic output, and satisfaction with their training. Data analysis included <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> tests for categorical data, analysis of variance for publication comparisons, and ordinal Likert scales for satisfaction.Results-Of 321 responses, 281 were included. GME alumni expressed greater satisfaction with mentorship and research opportunities; 95% of FAWM-only respondents reported exposure to career opportunities unknown prior to fellowship. There was no detectable difference (<i>P</i>=0.523) between FAWM-only respondents' number of WM-related publications. Overall, 93% of FAWM-only respondents and 76% of GME alumni would repeat their fellowship. Both groups demonstrated high proficiency in WM, with 89% feeling proficient.Conclusion-Both GME and FAWM pathways support WM education and career development. However, GME fellowships provide enhanced academic involvement, mentorship, and performance of relevant clinical skills. FAWM introduced new wilderness careers and had higher alumni satisfaction. These findings highlight the complementary roles of GME fellowships and FAWM recognition in advancing proficiency and professional growth.</p>","PeriodicalId":49360,"journal":{"name":"Wilderness & Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"10806032251345770"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wilderness & Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10806032251345770","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction-Wilderness medicine (WM) is a growing field offering advanced training and recognition through graduate medical education (GME) WM fellowships and the Fellow of the Academy of Wilderness Medicine (FAWM) professional designation. GME fellowships, introduced in 2004, provide immersive, structured training and experiential learning opportunities. The FAWM designation, established in 2005, is earned through approved educational activities. This study compared alumni outcomes between these pathways.Methods-A cross-sectional survey was conducted among GME fellowship graduates and FAWM recipients. Inclusion criteria were GME fellowship alumni or individuals with FAWM recognition. Exclusion criteria included incomplete surveys. Respondents were surveyed on demographics, academic output, and satisfaction with their training. Data analysis included χ2 tests for categorical data, analysis of variance for publication comparisons, and ordinal Likert scales for satisfaction.Results-Of 321 responses, 281 were included. GME alumni expressed greater satisfaction with mentorship and research opportunities; 95% of FAWM-only respondents reported exposure to career opportunities unknown prior to fellowship. There was no detectable difference (P=0.523) between FAWM-only respondents' number of WM-related publications. Overall, 93% of FAWM-only respondents and 76% of GME alumni would repeat their fellowship. Both groups demonstrated high proficiency in WM, with 89% feeling proficient.Conclusion-Both GME and FAWM pathways support WM education and career development. However, GME fellowships provide enhanced academic involvement, mentorship, and performance of relevant clinical skills. FAWM introduced new wilderness careers and had higher alumni satisfaction. These findings highlight the complementary roles of GME fellowships and FAWM recognition in advancing proficiency and professional growth.

研究生医学教育奖学金与专业学会课程:荒野医学校友成果与学术追求的比较研究。
荒野医学(WM)是一个不断发展的领域,通过研究生医学教育(GME) WM奖学金和荒野医学学院(FAWM)专业称号提供高级培训和认可。GME奖学金于2004年推出,提供沉浸式、结构化的培训和体验式学习机会。2005年建立的“世界知名教育机构”称号是通过认可的教育活动获得的。这项研究比较了这些途径的校友结果。方法:对GME奖学金毕业生和fam获得者进行横断面调查。纳入标准是GME奖学金校友或获得fam认可的个人。排除标准包括不完整的调查。受访者在人口统计、学术产出和培训满意度方面进行了调查。数据分析包括分类数据的χ2检验、发表比较的方差分析和满意度的有序李克特量表。结果:321份回复中,有281份被纳入。GME校友对导师和研究机会的满意度更高;只有fam的受访者中,95%的人报告说,在获得奖学金之前,他们接触到了未知的职业机会。仅fam的应答者在wm相关出版物的数量之间没有可检测到的差异(P=0.523)。总体而言,93%的fam校友和76%的GME校友会继续进修。两组均表现出较高的WM熟练程度,89%的人感觉熟练。结论:GME和fam途径都支持WM教育和职业发展。然而,GME奖学金提供了更多的学术参与、指导和相关临床技能的表现。fam引入了新的野外职业,校友满意度更高。这些发现突出了GME奖学金和fam认可在提高熟练程度和专业成长方面的互补作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wilderness & Environmental Medicine
Wilderness & Environmental Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Wilderness & Environmental Medicine, the official journal of the Wilderness Medical Society, is the leading journal for physicians practicing medicine in austere environments. This quarterly journal features articles on all aspects of wilderness medicine, including high altitude and climbing, cold- and heat-related phenomena, natural environmental disasters, immersion and near-drowning, diving, and barotrauma, hazardous plants/animals/insects/marine animals, animal attacks, search and rescue, ethical and legal issues, aeromedial transport, survival physiology, medicine in remote environments, travel medicine, operational medicine, and wilderness trauma management. It presents original research and clinical reports from scientists and practitioners around the globe. WEM invites submissions from authors who want to take advantage of our established publication''s unique scope, wide readership, and international recognition in the field of wilderness medicine. Its readership is a diverse group of medical and outdoor professionals who choose WEM as their primary wilderness medical resource.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信