{"title":"From observation to cognition: The impact of watching actions on child thought processes.","authors":"Yaqi Yue, Lijuan Wang","doi":"10.1007/s00426-025-02129-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous research has demonstrated that children's execution of actions consistent with their thinking can enhance cognitive processes. However, it remains unclear whether observing others performing actions consistent with thinking has a similar facilitative effect. In Experiment 1, we compared children's accuracy and reaction times in an observation group and an execution group under conditions involving actions that were either consistent or less consistent with thinking. The results showed that both groups performed better on tasks involving actions consistent with thinking, with the observation group slightly outperforming the execution group. Building on these findings, Experiment 2 investigated the impact of different observation modes (direct or indirect observation) and the presence of objects while observing others' actions on individual cognitive performance. The findings revealed that differences in task performance due to changes in observation mode were mainly reflected in the fluency of thinking, with direct observation being superior to indirect observation. The presence or absence of objects did not affect task performance. These results suggest that the sensorimotor system plays a causal and constitutive role in the development of higher cognitive processes, and this role can also be fulfilled by observing the actions of others.</p>","PeriodicalId":48184,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung","volume":"89 3","pages":"111"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-025-02129-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Previous research has demonstrated that children's execution of actions consistent with their thinking can enhance cognitive processes. However, it remains unclear whether observing others performing actions consistent with thinking has a similar facilitative effect. In Experiment 1, we compared children's accuracy and reaction times in an observation group and an execution group under conditions involving actions that were either consistent or less consistent with thinking. The results showed that both groups performed better on tasks involving actions consistent with thinking, with the observation group slightly outperforming the execution group. Building on these findings, Experiment 2 investigated the impact of different observation modes (direct or indirect observation) and the presence of objects while observing others' actions on individual cognitive performance. The findings revealed that differences in task performance due to changes in observation mode were mainly reflected in the fluency of thinking, with direct observation being superior to indirect observation. The presence or absence of objects did not affect task performance. These results suggest that the sensorimotor system plays a causal and constitutive role in the development of higher cognitive processes, and this role can also be fulfilled by observing the actions of others.
期刊介绍:
Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung publishes articles that contribute to a basic understanding of human perception, attention, memory, and action. The Journal is devoted to the dissemination of knowledge based on firm experimental ground, but not to particular approaches or schools of thought. Theoretical and historical papers are welcome to the extent that they serve this general purpose; papers of an applied nature are acceptable if they contribute to basic understanding or serve to bridge the often felt gap between basic and applied research in the field covered by the Journal.