Investigating Associations Between General and Disorder-Specific Reward and Suicidality in Anorexia Nervosa.

IF 3.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Soo-Eun Lee, Scott J Crow, Ann F Haynos
{"title":"Investigating Associations Between General and Disorder-Specific Reward and Suicidality in Anorexia Nervosa.","authors":"Soo-Eun Lee, Scott J Crow, Ann F Haynos","doi":"10.1002/erv.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Altered reward processing is proposed to be central to the pathology of anorexia nervosa (AN). This study aimed to investigate how aspects of reward dysfunction relate to suicidal thoughts and behaviours (STBs) in AN.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We compared responses on self-report measures of general (i.e., anticipatory, consummatory, and social reward) and disorder-specific (i.e., self-starvation reward) reward between individuals with AN with (AN + STBs; n = 28) or without (AN; n = 31) lifetime active STBs and healthy controls (HC; n = 32). Further, we examined whether interactions between general and disorder-specific reward dysfunction were associated with lifetime active STBs in AN.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to AN and HC groups, the AN + STBs group reported significantly lower anticipatory and social reward; both AN + STBs and AN groups reported higher self-starvation reward than HCs. When accounting for the effects of depression, group differences became non-significant for general rewards but remained significant for disorder-specific reward processing. The interaction between anticipatory and self-starvation reward was significantly associated with STB risk beyond the effects of depression: AN participants reporting high self-starvation reward were at elevated STB risk regardless of anticipatory reward levels, whereas those with low self-starvation reward showed increased STBs only when anticipatory reward was also low.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that the combination of general and disorder-specific reward processes may shape distinct suicidality risk profiles in AN.</p>","PeriodicalId":48117,"journal":{"name":"European Eating Disorders Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Eating Disorders Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.70002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Altered reward processing is proposed to be central to the pathology of anorexia nervosa (AN). This study aimed to investigate how aspects of reward dysfunction relate to suicidal thoughts and behaviours (STBs) in AN.

Method: We compared responses on self-report measures of general (i.e., anticipatory, consummatory, and social reward) and disorder-specific (i.e., self-starvation reward) reward between individuals with AN with (AN + STBs; n = 28) or without (AN; n = 31) lifetime active STBs and healthy controls (HC; n = 32). Further, we examined whether interactions between general and disorder-specific reward dysfunction were associated with lifetime active STBs in AN.

Results: Compared to AN and HC groups, the AN + STBs group reported significantly lower anticipatory and social reward; both AN + STBs and AN groups reported higher self-starvation reward than HCs. When accounting for the effects of depression, group differences became non-significant for general rewards but remained significant for disorder-specific reward processing. The interaction between anticipatory and self-starvation reward was significantly associated with STB risk beyond the effects of depression: AN participants reporting high self-starvation reward were at elevated STB risk regardless of anticipatory reward levels, whereas those with low self-starvation reward showed increased STBs only when anticipatory reward was also low.

Conclusion: Our results suggest that the combination of general and disorder-specific reward processes may shape distinct suicidality risk profiles in AN.

神经性厌食症一般奖励和障碍特异性奖励与自杀之间的关系研究。
目的:改变的奖励加工被认为是神经性厌食症(AN)病理的核心。本研究旨在探讨AN中奖励功能障碍与自杀念头和行为(STBs)的关系。方法:我们比较了AN + STBs患者自我报告的一般奖励(即预期奖励、圆满奖励和社会奖励)和障碍特异性奖励(即自我饥饿奖励)的反应;n = 28)或无(AN;n = 31)终生活动性性病患者和健康对照(HC;n = 32)。此外,我们研究了AN中一般和疾病特异性奖励功能障碍之间的相互作用是否与终生活动性STBs相关。结果:与AN和HC组相比,AN + STBs组的预期奖励和社会奖励显著降低;AN + stb组和AN组报告的自我饥饿奖励高于hc组。当考虑到抑郁的影响时,对于一般奖励,组间差异变得不显著,但对于特定障碍的奖励处理,组间差异仍然显著。预期奖励和自我饥饿奖励之间的相互作用与STB风险显著相关,而不仅仅是抑郁的影响:无论预期奖励水平如何,报告高自我饥饿奖励的AN参与者都有较高的STB风险,而那些自我饥饿奖励低的参与者只有在预期奖励也低的情况下才显示出增加的STB风险。结论:我们的研究结果表明,一般奖励过程和障碍特异性奖励过程的结合可能会形成AN中不同的自杀风险概况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Eating Disorders Review
European Eating Disorders Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.50%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: European Eating Disorders Review publishes authoritative and accessible articles, from all over the world, which review or report original research that has implications for the treatment and care of people with eating disorders, and articles which report innovations and experience in the clinical management of eating disorders. The journal focuses on implications for best practice in diagnosis and treatment. The journal also provides a forum for discussion of the causes and prevention of eating disorders, and related health policy. The aims of the journal are to offer a channel of communication between researchers, practitioners, administrators and policymakers who need to report and understand developments in the field of eating disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信