Optimal Cut-Off Point for Self-Rated Successful Aging Based on the Rowe and Kahn's Model.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY
Cem Soylu, Banu Cengelci Ozekes
{"title":"Optimal Cut-Off Point for Self-Rated Successful Aging Based on the Rowe and Kahn's Model.","authors":"Cem Soylu, Banu Cengelci Ozekes","doi":"10.1177/07334648251351714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is no consensus on the optimal self-rated successful aging (SRSA) cut-off point for determining whether aging is successful. The present study aims to address this gap by identifying reliable SRSA cut-off points through a comparison based on Rowe and Kahn's (1997) successful aging model. A sample of 478 older adult residents of municipal centers and nursing homes aged ≥50 years (<i>M</i> = 72.11, <i>SD</i> = 10.43) were subjected to the single-item SRSA evaluation, as well as scale sets measuring Rowe and Kahn's (1997) criteria. A receiver-operating characteristic analysis was then used to determine a range of potential SRSA cut-off points to discriminate between successful and not successful agers. The application of Rowe and Kahn's (1997) successful aging criteria revealed an optimum cut-off point of ≥7, having the best balance of sensitivity (86.7 or 74.9%) and specificity (46.9 or 55.3%).</p>","PeriodicalId":47970,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Gerontology","volume":" ","pages":"7334648251351714"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648251351714","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is no consensus on the optimal self-rated successful aging (SRSA) cut-off point for determining whether aging is successful. The present study aims to address this gap by identifying reliable SRSA cut-off points through a comparison based on Rowe and Kahn's (1997) successful aging model. A sample of 478 older adult residents of municipal centers and nursing homes aged ≥50 years (M = 72.11, SD = 10.43) were subjected to the single-item SRSA evaluation, as well as scale sets measuring Rowe and Kahn's (1997) criteria. A receiver-operating characteristic analysis was then used to determine a range of potential SRSA cut-off points to discriminate between successful and not successful agers. The application of Rowe and Kahn's (1997) successful aging criteria revealed an optimum cut-off point of ≥7, having the best balance of sensitivity (86.7 or 74.9%) and specificity (46.9 or 55.3%).

基于Rowe和Kahn模型的自评成功老化的最优截断点。
对于确定衰老是否成功的最佳自评成功衰老(SRSA)分界点尚未达成共识。本研究旨在通过基于Rowe和Kahn(1997)成功的老龄化模型的比较,通过确定可靠的SRSA分界点来解决这一差距。选取478名年龄≥50岁的城市中心和养老院的老年居民(M = 72.11, SD = 10.43)进行单项SRSA评估,并采用Rowe和Kahn(1997)标准的量表集进行评估。然后使用接受者操作特征分析来确定潜在的SRSA分界点范围,以区分成功和不成功的老年人。Rowe和Kahn(1997)成功的衰老标准的应用表明,最佳截断点≥7,具有敏感性(86.7或74.9%)和特异性(46.9或55.3%)的最佳平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Gerontology (JAG) is the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society. It features articles that focus on research applications intended to improve the quality of life of older persons or to enhance our understanding of age-related issues that will eventually lead to such outcomes. We construe application broadly and encourage contributions across a range of applications toward those foci, including interventions, methodology, policy, and theory. Manuscripts from all disciplines represented in gerontology are welcome. Because the circulation and intended audience of JAG is global, contributions from international authors are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信