Perceptions of the Future and Pregnancy Avoidance in the U.S.

IF 2.6 3区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY
Population Research and Policy Review Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-10 DOI:10.1007/s11113-025-09962-2
Karen Benjamin Guzzo, Anna Belykh, Wendy Manning, Monica Longmore, Peggy Giordano, Sara Roza
{"title":"Perceptions of the Future and Pregnancy Avoidance in the U.S.","authors":"Karen Benjamin Guzzo, Anna Belykh, Wendy Manning, Monica Longmore, Peggy Giordano, Sara Roza","doi":"10.1007/s11113-025-09962-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite low U.S. fertility rates since the Great Recession, two-child norms remain pervasive, suggesting individuals are unable to achieve their goals. To understand what may be driving the apparent mismatch between goals and behavior, we focus on pregnancy avoidance, as individuals may be deciding against births in the short term rather than deciding not to have any, or any more, children. Further, we incorporate subjective evaluations of the future related to economic and relational factors as well as objective socioeconomic indicators, drawing from the Narratives of the Future framework and Easterlin's theory about expected standard of living. We use data from the 2018-2020 wave of the Toledo Adolescent Relationships Study (<i>N</i> = 880), a population-based dataset, to examine short-term pregnancy avoidance among adults aged 29-36. We find that higher levels of personal economic pessimism and concerns about having a good relationship in the future are associated with greater importance of avoiding a pregnancy in the short term, even when controlling for objective characteristics such as economic hardship, relationship status, and other sociodemographic covariates. The results highlight the need to incorporate both subjective and objective statuses in research on fertility decision-making, and the implications of these findings point to short-term pregnancy avoidance and fertility postponement as a potential mechanism underlying contemporary low birth rates in the U.S.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11113-025-09962-2.</p>","PeriodicalId":47633,"journal":{"name":"Population Research and Policy Review","volume":"44 3","pages":"36"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12152052/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Research and Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-025-09962-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite low U.S. fertility rates since the Great Recession, two-child norms remain pervasive, suggesting individuals are unable to achieve their goals. To understand what may be driving the apparent mismatch between goals and behavior, we focus on pregnancy avoidance, as individuals may be deciding against births in the short term rather than deciding not to have any, or any more, children. Further, we incorporate subjective evaluations of the future related to economic and relational factors as well as objective socioeconomic indicators, drawing from the Narratives of the Future framework and Easterlin's theory about expected standard of living. We use data from the 2018-2020 wave of the Toledo Adolescent Relationships Study (N = 880), a population-based dataset, to examine short-term pregnancy avoidance among adults aged 29-36. We find that higher levels of personal economic pessimism and concerns about having a good relationship in the future are associated with greater importance of avoiding a pregnancy in the short term, even when controlling for objective characteristics such as economic hardship, relationship status, and other sociodemographic covariates. The results highlight the need to incorporate both subjective and objective statuses in research on fertility decision-making, and the implications of these findings point to short-term pregnancy avoidance and fertility postponement as a potential mechanism underlying contemporary low birth rates in the U.S.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11113-025-09962-2.

美国人对未来的认知和避免怀孕
尽管自经济大衰退以来美国的生育率一直很低,但二孩标准仍然普遍存在,这表明个人无法实现自己的目标。为了理解是什么导致了目标和行为之间的明显不匹配,我们将重点放在避免怀孕上,因为个人可能在短期内决定不生孩子,而不是决定不生孩子,或者不再生孩子。此外,我们从未来叙事框架和伊斯特林关于预期生活水平的理论中吸取了与经济和相关因素以及客观社会经济指标相关的对未来的主观评估。我们使用2018-2020年托莱多青少年关系研究(N = 880)的数据,这是一个基于人口的数据集,研究29-36岁成年人的短期妊娠避免。我们发现,即使在控制客观特征(如经济困难、关系状况和其他社会人口协变量)的情况下,个人经济悲观情绪和对未来良好关系的担忧程度越高,短期内避免怀孕的重要性也越高。这些结果强调了在生育决策研究中需要结合主观和客观的状态,这些发现的含义指出,短期避免怀孕和推迟生育是当代美国低出生率的潜在机制。补充信息:在线版本包含补充材料,可在10.1007/s11113-025-09962-2获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Now accepted in JSTOR! Population Research and Policy Review has a twofold goal: it provides a convenient source for government officials and scholars in which they can learn about the policy implications of recent research relevant to the causes and consequences of changing population size and composition; and it provides a broad, interdisciplinary coverage of population research. Population Research and Policy Review seeks to publish quality material of interest to professionals working in the fields of population, and those fields which intersect and overlap with population studies. The publication includes demographic, economic, social, political and health research papers and related contributions which are based on either the direct scientific evaluation of particular policies or programs, or general contributions intended to advance knowledge that informs policy and program development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信