Lower extremity functional performance tests and their measurement properties in athletes: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.

IF 3.9 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002389
Rosalyn Cooke, Alison Rushton, James Martin, Andy Soundy, Lee Herrington, Nicola R Heneghan
{"title":"Lower extremity functional performance tests and their measurement properties in athletes: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.","authors":"Rosalyn Cooke, Alison Rushton, James Martin, Andy Soundy, Lee Herrington, Nicola R Heneghan","doi":"10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong></p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify functional performance tests (FPTs) with potential to identify athletes at risk of lower extremity injury (LEI) and assess their measurement properties.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review conducted in line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and PRISMA in Exercise, Rehabilitation, Sports Medicine and Sports Science guidance.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Two-stage systematic search of Medline, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and SPORTDiscus databases from inception to 24 November 2023, supplemented by hand searching of reference lists, key journals and grey literature.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>Search 1 identified FPT predicting LEI in athletes aged >16 years competing at elite, pre-elite or collegiate levels and feasible in the field. Search 2 assessed measurement properties of identified FPT. COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments risk of bias checklist and criteria for good measurement properties were applied, and evidence summarised using modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-nine studies evaluating 15 FPTs were included. Reliability (n=14), measurement error (n=11), structural validity/internal consistency (n=2), criterion validity (n=11), construct validity (n=5) and responsiveness (n=1) were assessed. No FPT demonstrated high certainty for measurement properties. Y-balance test (YBT) demonstrated moderate certainty for three properties (intrarater reliability, criterion validity and responsiveness). Knee to wall (KTW), single-leg squat (SLS), drop vertical jump (DVJ) and single hop for distance (SHFD) showed moderate certainty for two properties (reliability, intra/inter test-retest; criterion validity). Side hop, functional movement screen and landing error scoring system showed moderate certainty for one measurement property. Practicability assessment revealed poor reporting of time requirements and results production.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Moderate-certainty evidence supported reliability and validity of five FPTs (YBT, KTW, SLS, DVJ, SHFD) used to identify athletes at LEI risk. Studies with low bias and comprehensive practicability evaluations are lacking. <b>PROSPERO registration number</b> CRD42020188932.</p>","PeriodicalId":47417,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","volume":"11 2","pages":"e002389"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12161384/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective: To identify functional performance tests (FPTs) with potential to identify athletes at risk of lower extremity injury (LEI) and assess their measurement properties.

Design: Systematic review conducted in line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and PRISMA in Exercise, Rehabilitation, Sports Medicine and Sports Science guidance.

Data sources: Two-stage systematic search of Medline, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and SPORTDiscus databases from inception to 24 November 2023, supplemented by hand searching of reference lists, key journals and grey literature.

Eligibility criteria: Search 1 identified FPT predicting LEI in athletes aged >16 years competing at elite, pre-elite or collegiate levels and feasible in the field. Search 2 assessed measurement properties of identified FPT. COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments risk of bias checklist and criteria for good measurement properties were applied, and evidence summarised using modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations guidelines.

Results: Fifty-nine studies evaluating 15 FPTs were included. Reliability (n=14), measurement error (n=11), structural validity/internal consistency (n=2), criterion validity (n=11), construct validity (n=5) and responsiveness (n=1) were assessed. No FPT demonstrated high certainty for measurement properties. Y-balance test (YBT) demonstrated moderate certainty for three properties (intrarater reliability, criterion validity and responsiveness). Knee to wall (KTW), single-leg squat (SLS), drop vertical jump (DVJ) and single hop for distance (SHFD) showed moderate certainty for two properties (reliability, intra/inter test-retest; criterion validity). Side hop, functional movement screen and landing error scoring system showed moderate certainty for one measurement property. Practicability assessment revealed poor reporting of time requirements and results production.

Conclusion: Moderate-certainty evidence supported reliability and validity of five FPTs (YBT, KTW, SLS, DVJ, SHFD) used to identify athletes at LEI risk. Studies with low bias and comprehensive practicability evaluations are lacking. PROSPERO registration number CRD42020188932.

运动员下肢功能性能测试及其测量特性:系统回顾和叙述综合。
摘要:目的:探讨功能表现测试(FPTs)在识别运动员下肢损伤(LEI)风险中的潜力,并评估其测量特性。设计:按照运动、康复、运动医学和运动科学指导中系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目和PRISMA进行系统评价。数据来源:两阶段系统检索Medline、Embase、Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature和SPORTDiscus数据库,自成立至2023年11月24日,辅以手工检索参考文献列表、重点期刊和灰色文献。资格标准:搜索1确定了FPT预测bb0 - 16岁的精英、准精英或大学水平运动员的LEI,并且在该领域可行。搜索2已确定FPT的评估测量特性。采用了基于共识的卫生测量仪器选择标准、偏倚风险检查表和良好测量特性标准,并使用修改后的建议、评估、发展和评价分级指南对证据进行了总结。结果:纳入59项研究,评估15个FPTs。评估信度(n=14)、测量误差(n=11)、结构效度/内部一致性(n=2)、标准效度(n=11)、结构效度(n=5)和反应性(n=1)。没有FPT显示出测量性质的高确定性。y -平衡测试(YBT)显示了三个属性(内部信度,效度和响应性)的中等确定性。膝对墙(KTW)、单腿深蹲(SLS)、垂直落差跳(DVJ)和单跳距离(SHFD)在两项特性(信度,内/外测试-重测试;效标效度)。侧身跳、功能动作画面和落地误差评分系统对其中一项测量性能具有中等的确定性。实用性评估显示报告的时间要求和结果生产不佳。结论:使用YBT、KTW、SLS、DVJ、SHFD等5种fpt来识别运动员LEI风险的信度和效度具有中等确定性证据。缺乏低偏倚和综合实用性评价的研究。普洛斯彼罗注册号CRD42020188932。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
106
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信