Corinne N Kacmarek, Julie Kreyenbuhl, Hildi J Hagedorn, Clayton H Brown, Elizabeth Jane Richardson, Max Spaderna, Madeline R Marks, Melanie E Bennett, Daniel J O Roche
{"title":"Provider Perspectives on Medication for AUD in Mental Health and Substance Use Disorder Clinics.","authors":"Corinne N Kacmarek, Julie Kreyenbuhl, Hildi J Hagedorn, Clayton H Brown, Elizabeth Jane Richardson, Max Spaderna, Madeline R Marks, Melanie E Bennett, Daniel J O Roche","doi":"10.1080/15504263.2025.2515026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) is comorbid with major mental illnesses, but prescribing rates for medications for AUD (mAUD) are low. <b>Methods:</b> We surveyed 71 mental health and 42 substance use disorder (SUD) treatment providers in an academic medical center about AUD treatment practices. <b>Results:</b> Fifty-three mental health and 14 SUD providers responded. Among the n = 22 mental health prescribers, a minority (29%) prescribed mAUD often. Sixty percent of mental health providers viewed mAUD as effective. Barriers to mAUD prescribing in mental health included believing SUD providers were better equipped to prescribe mAUD, whereas SUD providers assumed that patients were not interested in mAUD. All providers were willing to participate in mAUD education initiatives, but few were willing to engage in more time-intensive implementation activities. <b>Conclusions:</b> Improving knowledge and attitudes may improve mental health provider delivery of mAUD, but evidence-based strategies for improving prescribing may be less acceptable and feasible for providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":46571,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15504263.2025.2515026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) is comorbid with major mental illnesses, but prescribing rates for medications for AUD (mAUD) are low. Methods: We surveyed 71 mental health and 42 substance use disorder (SUD) treatment providers in an academic medical center about AUD treatment practices. Results: Fifty-three mental health and 14 SUD providers responded. Among the n = 22 mental health prescribers, a minority (29%) prescribed mAUD often. Sixty percent of mental health providers viewed mAUD as effective. Barriers to mAUD prescribing in mental health included believing SUD providers were better equipped to prescribe mAUD, whereas SUD providers assumed that patients were not interested in mAUD. All providers were willing to participate in mAUD education initiatives, but few were willing to engage in more time-intensive implementation activities. Conclusions: Improving knowledge and attitudes may improve mental health provider delivery of mAUD, but evidence-based strategies for improving prescribing may be less acceptable and feasible for providers.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Dual Diagnosis is a quarterly, international publication that focuses on the full spectrum of complexities regarding dual diagnosis. The co-occurrence of mental health and substance use disorders, or “dual diagnosis,” is one of the quintessential issues in behavioral health. Why do such high rates of co-occurrence exist? What does it tell us about risk profiles? How do these linked disorders affect people, their families, and the communities in which they live? What are the natural paths to recovery? What specific treatments are most helpful and how can new ones be developed? How can we enhance the implementation of evidence-based practices at clinical, administrative, and policy levels? How can we help clients to learn active recovery skills and adopt needed supports, clinicians to master new interventions, programs to implement effective services, and communities to foster healthy adjustment? The Journal addresses each of these perplexing challenges.