Forensic comparison analysis of smokeless powders by gel permeation chromatography and likelihood ratio evaluation methods.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Forensic Sciences Research Pub Date : 2024-02-06 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1093/fsr/owaf005
Hongling Guo, Ping Wang, Can Hu, Hongcheng Mei, Yajun Li, Jun Zhu
{"title":"Forensic comparison analysis of smokeless powders by gel permeation chromatography and likelihood ratio evaluation methods.","authors":"Hongling Guo, Ping Wang, Can Hu, Hongcheng Mei, Yajun Li, Jun Zhu","doi":"10.1093/fsr/owaf005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In China, the use of smokeless powders for making homemade ammunition and bombs is an incipient criminal practice. One of the key tasks of analyzing smokeless powders in forensic sciences is to make comparisons between them, providing information about their source or establishing a link between two different smokeless powders seized at different locations. The main component of smokeless powders is nitrocellulose (NC) no matter what type of the smokeless powder is. As a kind of polymer, NC may have different molecular weights and polydispersity index (PDI) values, which could help the identification and differentiation of the smokeless powders. In this study, weight-average molecular weights (Mw), number-average molecular weights (Mn), and PDI value of 79 propellants samples from different sources were measured by gel permeation chromatography, and likelihood ratio evaluation method was applied to facilitate interpretation of the data. The possibility of using these methods to make comparisons between smokeless powders was explored instead of depending on analysis of target compounds with trace amounts in them.</p>","PeriodicalId":45852,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Sciences Research","volume":"10 2","pages":"owaf005"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12161493/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Sciences Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fsr/owaf005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In China, the use of smokeless powders for making homemade ammunition and bombs is an incipient criminal practice. One of the key tasks of analyzing smokeless powders in forensic sciences is to make comparisons between them, providing information about their source or establishing a link between two different smokeless powders seized at different locations. The main component of smokeless powders is nitrocellulose (NC) no matter what type of the smokeless powder is. As a kind of polymer, NC may have different molecular weights and polydispersity index (PDI) values, which could help the identification and differentiation of the smokeless powders. In this study, weight-average molecular weights (Mw), number-average molecular weights (Mn), and PDI value of 79 propellants samples from different sources were measured by gel permeation chromatography, and likelihood ratio evaluation method was applied to facilitate interpretation of the data. The possibility of using these methods to make comparisons between smokeless powders was explored instead of depending on analysis of target compounds with trace amounts in them.

凝胶渗透色谱法和似然比评价法对无烟粉末的法医比对分析。
在中国,使用无烟粉末制造自制弹药和炸弹是一种初期的犯罪行为。在法医科学中,分析无烟粉末的关键任务之一是对它们进行比较,提供有关其来源的信息,或在不同地点查获的两种不同无烟粉末之间建立联系。无论哪种无烟粉末,其主要成分都是硝化纤维(NC)。NC作为一种聚合物,具有不同的分子量和不同的PDI值,这有助于无烟粉末的鉴别和区分。本研究采用凝胶渗透色谱法测定了79种不同来源推进剂样品的质量-平均分子量(Mw)、数量-平均分子量(Mn)和PDI值,并采用似然比评价法对数据进行解释。探索了使用这些方法来比较无烟粉末的可能性,而不是依赖于对痕量目标化合物的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forensic Sciences Research
Forensic Sciences Research MEDICINE, LEGAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
158
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信