Dynamic Complexity of Positive and Negative Affect in NSSI - A Daily Diary Study.

IF 2.4 Q2 Psychology
Clinical Psychology in Europe Pub Date : 2025-05-28 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.32872/cpe.14527
Michaela Bruckbauer-Schwed, Tim Kaiser, Marc Keglevic, Anton-Rupert Laireiter
{"title":"Dynamic Complexity of Positive and Negative Affect in NSSI - A Daily Diary Study.","authors":"Michaela Bruckbauer-Schwed, Tim Kaiser, Marc Keglevic, Anton-Rupert Laireiter","doi":"10.32872/cpe.14527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is a major health problem. Functionally, it is related to affect instability and increased affective intensity. The role of negative emotions has already been extensively explored, only few studies have focused on positive emotions. The concept of dynamic complexity (DC) is particularly well suited to differentially analyze the dynamics of affect collected by ecological momentary assessment (EMA). This study examines DC of positive and negative emotions in individuals with and without NSSI history in an EMA setting.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants from a clinical NSSI group (<i>n</i> = 28) and a comparable clinical non-NSSI control group (<i>n</i> = 33) completed the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) once a day between six to 37 days (<i>M</i> = 15.60, <i>SD</i> = 5.80). DC was calculated for the assessed time-series of daily affect. Additionally, we fitted a linear mixed model to predict positive and negative dynamic complexity with length of stay and group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to controls, individuals with a history of NSSI showed significantly more positive affect and had significantly higher DC in affect in general. No significant difference for negative affect was found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that it is important to assess dynamic emotional patterns and to analyze in detail the role of positive and negative affect in individuals with NSSI in order to better understand the complex interplay between the different emotional states and to be able to use it for diagnostic purposes and clinical interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":34029,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology in Europe","volume":"7 2","pages":"e14527"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12152227/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology in Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.14527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is a major health problem. Functionally, it is related to affect instability and increased affective intensity. The role of negative emotions has already been extensively explored, only few studies have focused on positive emotions. The concept of dynamic complexity (DC) is particularly well suited to differentially analyze the dynamics of affect collected by ecological momentary assessment (EMA). This study examines DC of positive and negative emotions in individuals with and without NSSI history in an EMA setting.

Method: Participants from a clinical NSSI group (n = 28) and a comparable clinical non-NSSI control group (n = 33) completed the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) once a day between six to 37 days (M = 15.60, SD = 5.80). DC was calculated for the assessed time-series of daily affect. Additionally, we fitted a linear mixed model to predict positive and negative dynamic complexity with length of stay and group.

Results: Compared to controls, individuals with a history of NSSI showed significantly more positive affect and had significantly higher DC in affect in general. No significant difference for negative affect was found.

Conclusion: Our results suggest that it is important to assess dynamic emotional patterns and to analyze in detail the role of positive and negative affect in individuals with NSSI in order to better understand the complex interplay between the different emotional states and to be able to use it for diagnostic purposes and clinical interventions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

自伤中积极和消极情绪的动态复杂性——一项每日日记研究。
背景:非自杀性自伤是一个重要的健康问题。在功能上,它与情感不稳定和情感强度增加有关。负面情绪的作用已经被广泛探讨,只有少数研究关注积极情绪。动态复杂性(DC)的概念特别适合于对生态瞬时评价(EMA)收集的影响动态进行差异性分析。本研究考察了在EMA环境中有和没有自伤史的个体的积极和消极情绪的DC。方法:来自临床自伤组(n = 28)和临床非自伤对照组(n = 33)的参与者(M = 15.60, SD = 5.80)在6至37天内每天完成一次积极和消极影响量表(PANAS)。计算每日影响评估时间序列的DC。此外,我们拟合了一个线性混合模型来预测正负动态复杂性与逗留时间和群体的关系。结果:与对照组相比,有自伤史的个体表现出明显更多的积极情绪,总体上有明显更高的DC情绪。在负性情绪方面无显著差异。结论:我们的研究结果表明,为了更好地理解不同情绪状态之间复杂的相互作用,并能够将其用于诊断目的和临床干预,评估动态情绪模式并详细分析积极和消极情绪在自伤个体中的作用是非常重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Psychology in Europe
Clinical Psychology in Europe Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信