Risk Factors for Postoperative Coronal Malalignment in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis and Its Impact on Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine Pub Date : 2025-06-13 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005429
Dongfan Wang, Yan Zhang, Stone Sima, Zuoran Fan, Weiguo Zhu, Xiaolong Chen, Shibao Lu
{"title":"Risk Factors for Postoperative Coronal Malalignment in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis and Its Impact on Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Dongfan Wang, Yan Zhang, Stone Sima, Zuoran Fan, Weiguo Zhu, Xiaolong Chen, Shibao Lu","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-Analysis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify risk factors for postoperative coronal malalignment (CM) and evaluate its impact on clinical outcomes in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative CM is a common complication after DLS surgery, with an incidence ranging from 20.7% to 38.9%. Identifying its risk factors and impact on surgical outcomes may enhance understanding of the condition and help optimize clinical management strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Relevant studies were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The inclusion criteria were: (1) comparative studies analyzing CM versus non-CM in DLS patients, (2) outcomes reported including demographic data, surgical details, radiographic parameters, and patients-reported outcomes, and (3) observational studies published in English from the inception of the databases to January 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies with a total of 617 patients (191 CM, 426 non-CM) were included. Compared to the non-CM group, patients in the CM group had a higher proportion of females (P=0.03), larger major Cobb angle (P=0.005), greater LS curve Cobb angle (P<0.001), increased L4 tilt angle (P=0.01), L5 tilt angle (P<0.001), and AVT (P<0.001) preoperatively. Postoperatively, CM patients showed higher residual LS curve Cobb angle (P=0.02), L4 tilt angle (P=0.04), and L5 tilt angle (P<0.001), as well as a lower LS curve Cobb angle correction rate (P=0.005). Additionally, the CM group exhibited higher ODI score (P=0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Female sex, more severe preoperative coronal deformity, and insufficient correction of the lumbosacral curve are significant factors for postoperative CM following DLS surgery. The presence of CM is associated with diminished functional improvement after surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005429","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Systematic review and meta-Analysis.

Objective: To identify risk factors for postoperative coronal malalignment (CM) and evaluate its impact on clinical outcomes in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS).

Background: Postoperative CM is a common complication after DLS surgery, with an incidence ranging from 20.7% to 38.9%. Identifying its risk factors and impact on surgical outcomes may enhance understanding of the condition and help optimize clinical management strategies.

Methods: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Relevant studies were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The inclusion criteria were: (1) comparative studies analyzing CM versus non-CM in DLS patients, (2) outcomes reported including demographic data, surgical details, radiographic parameters, and patients-reported outcomes, and (3) observational studies published in English from the inception of the databases to January 2024.

Results: Seven studies with a total of 617 patients (191 CM, 426 non-CM) were included. Compared to the non-CM group, patients in the CM group had a higher proportion of females (P=0.03), larger major Cobb angle (P=0.005), greater LS curve Cobb angle (P<0.001), increased L4 tilt angle (P=0.01), L5 tilt angle (P<0.001), and AVT (P<0.001) preoperatively. Postoperatively, CM patients showed higher residual LS curve Cobb angle (P=0.02), L4 tilt angle (P=0.04), and L5 tilt angle (P<0.001), as well as a lower LS curve Cobb angle correction rate (P=0.005). Additionally, the CM group exhibited higher ODI score (P=0.003).

Conclusion: Female sex, more severe preoperative coronal deformity, and insufficient correction of the lumbosacral curve are significant factors for postoperative CM following DLS surgery. The presence of CM is associated with diminished functional improvement after surgery.

退行性腰椎侧凸术后冠状位错位的危险因素及其对临床结果的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
研究设计:系统评价和荟萃分析。目的:探讨退行性腰椎侧凸(DLS)患者术后冠状位排列失调(CM)的危险因素,并评价其对临床预后的影响。背景:术后CM是DLS术后常见的并发症,发生率为20.7% ~ 38.9%。确定其危险因素和对手术结果的影响可以增强对病情的了解,并有助于优化临床管理策略。方法:本系统评价按照PRISMA指南进行。相关研究检索自PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Cochrane Library和ClinicalTrials.gov。纳入标准为:(1)分析DLS患者CM与非CM的比较研究,(2)报告的结果包括人口统计数据、手术细节、放射学参数和患者报告的结果,以及(3)从数据库建立到2024年1月以英文发表的观察性研究。结果:7项研究共纳入617例患者(191例CM, 426例非CM)。与非CM组相比,CM组患者女性比例更高(P=0.03),大Cobb角更大(P=0.005), LS曲线Cobb角更大(P)。结论:女性、术前冠状畸形更严重、腰骶曲线矫正不够是DLS术后CM的重要因素。CM的存在与术后功能改善减少有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信