Preoperative Predictors of Poor Outcomes Following Lumbar Discectomy. A Study based on the National Finspine Registry.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine Pub Date : 2025-06-13 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005425
Antti Saarinen, Eetu Suominen, Liisa Pekkanen, Antti Malmivaara, Jukka Huttunen, Katri Pernaa, Henri Salo, Jussi P Repo
{"title":"Preoperative Predictors of Poor Outcomes Following Lumbar Discectomy. A Study based on the National Finspine Registry.","authors":"Antti Saarinen, Eetu Suominen, Liisa Pekkanen, Antti Malmivaara, Jukka Huttunen, Katri Pernaa, Henri Salo, Jussi P Repo","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify predictors for poor outcome after lumbar discectomy for herniated disc.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Lumbar discectomy for herniated disc is a common spinal procedure. Despite the surgical treatment, some patients are left with persistent pain and poor health-related quality of life. We aim to research preoperative predictive factors associated with poor outcome after lumbar discectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>National spine surgery registry was searched for patients who underwent primary discectomy for lumbar disc herniation between 2017 and 2022. All patients had a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. The primary outcome was disability at 12 months postoperatively, assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Patients were categorized into satisfactory (ODI 0-40) and poor outcome groups (ODI 41-100). Logistic regression was used to identify preoperative predictors of poor outcome. Variables for multivariable analysis were selected based on clinical relevance assessed by senior authors and bivariate associations. Secondary outcomes included pain scores and patient-reported satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all, 3339 patients were included, of whom 2991 (90%) had minimal to moderate disability and 348 (10%) had severe disability assessed with ODI at the follow-up. Several factors were identified to associate with poor outcome after the surgery: older age (OR 1.03,95%CI 1.02-1.03), female sex (OR 1.28,95%CI 1.03-1.61), higher body mass index (OR 1.06,95%CI 1.02-1.09), cardiologic comorbidity (OR 4.27,95%CI 2.4-7.3), regular preoperative painkiller use (OR 2.2,95%CI 1.5-3.3), and higher number of operated vertebrae (OR 2.4,95%CI 1.6-3.6). Symptom lasting over one year was associated with worse outcomes when compared with symptoms for 3-12 months (OR 0.42,95%CI 0.29-0.60), 6-12 weeks (OR 0.23,95%CI 0.12-0.39), and those with symptoms for less than 6 weeks (OR 0.35,95%CI 0.19-0.62). Employed individuals were significantly associated with better outcomes when compared other statuses. Worse preoperative quality of life scores was associated with poor outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Several preoperative factors were associated with poor outcome after lumbar discectomy. Identifying higher-risk patients - such as those with high BMI, older age, or significant comorbidities - can support preoperative counseling and targeted interventions. Optimizing modifiable factors preoperatively may improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005425","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Objective: To identify predictors for poor outcome after lumbar discectomy for herniated disc.

Summary of background data: Lumbar discectomy for herniated disc is a common spinal procedure. Despite the surgical treatment, some patients are left with persistent pain and poor health-related quality of life. We aim to research preoperative predictive factors associated with poor outcome after lumbar discectomy.

Methods: National spine surgery registry was searched for patients who underwent primary discectomy for lumbar disc herniation between 2017 and 2022. All patients had a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. The primary outcome was disability at 12 months postoperatively, assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Patients were categorized into satisfactory (ODI 0-40) and poor outcome groups (ODI 41-100). Logistic regression was used to identify preoperative predictors of poor outcome. Variables for multivariable analysis were selected based on clinical relevance assessed by senior authors and bivariate associations. Secondary outcomes included pain scores and patient-reported satisfaction.

Results: In all, 3339 patients were included, of whom 2991 (90%) had minimal to moderate disability and 348 (10%) had severe disability assessed with ODI at the follow-up. Several factors were identified to associate with poor outcome after the surgery: older age (OR 1.03,95%CI 1.02-1.03), female sex (OR 1.28,95%CI 1.03-1.61), higher body mass index (OR 1.06,95%CI 1.02-1.09), cardiologic comorbidity (OR 4.27,95%CI 2.4-7.3), regular preoperative painkiller use (OR 2.2,95%CI 1.5-3.3), and higher number of operated vertebrae (OR 2.4,95%CI 1.6-3.6). Symptom lasting over one year was associated with worse outcomes when compared with symptoms for 3-12 months (OR 0.42,95%CI 0.29-0.60), 6-12 weeks (OR 0.23,95%CI 0.12-0.39), and those with symptoms for less than 6 weeks (OR 0.35,95%CI 0.19-0.62). Employed individuals were significantly associated with better outcomes when compared other statuses. Worse preoperative quality of life scores was associated with poor outcome.

Conclusion: Several preoperative factors were associated with poor outcome after lumbar discectomy. Identifying higher-risk patients - such as those with high BMI, older age, or significant comorbidities - can support preoperative counseling and targeted interventions. Optimizing modifiable factors preoperatively may improve outcomes.

腰椎间盘切除术后不良预后的术前预测因素。一项基于国家鳍骨登记处的研究。
研究设计:回顾性队列研究。目的:探讨腰椎间盘突出症腰椎间盘切除术后不良预后的预测因素。背景资料摘要:腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症是一种常见的脊柱手术。尽管手术治疗,一些患者留下了持续的疼痛和健康相关的生活质量差。我们的目的是研究与腰椎间盘切除术后不良预后相关的术前预测因素。方法:检索国家脊柱外科登记处2017年至2022年间因腰椎间盘突出症接受原发性椎间盘切除术的患者。所有患者至少有2年的随访。主要终点是术后12个月的残疾,使用Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)进行评估。将患者分为满意组(ODI 0-40)和不良组(ODI 41-100)。采用Logistic回归确定术前预后不良的预测因素。多变量分析的变量是根据资深作者评估的临床相关性和双变量关联选择的。次要结局包括疼痛评分和患者报告的满意度。结果:共纳入3339例患者,其中2991例(90%)为轻度至中度残疾,348例(10%)为重度残疾,随访时经ODI评估。确定了与术后不良预后相关的几个因素:年龄较大(OR 1.03,95%CI 1.02-1.03)、女性(OR 1.28,95%CI 1.03-1.61)、较高的体重指数(OR 1.06,95%CI 1.02-1.09)、心血管合并症(OR 4.27,95%CI 2.4-7.3)、术前常规使用止痛药(OR 2.2,95%CI 1.5-3.3)和较多的手术椎体(OR 2.4,95%CI 1.6-3.6)。与症状持续3-12个月(OR 0.42,95%CI 0.29-0.60)、6-12周(OR 0.23,95%CI 0.12-0.39)和症状持续不到6周(OR 0.35,95%CI 0.19-0.62)的患者相比,症状持续1年以上的患者预后更差。与其他状态相比,有工作的个体与更好的结果显著相关。术前生活质量评分差与预后差相关。结论:几个术前因素与腰椎间盘切除术后预后不良有关。识别高风险患者——如BMI高、年龄较大或有显著合并症的患者——可以为术前咨询和有针对性的干预提供支持。术前优化可调整因素可改善预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信