Bibliometric Analysis in Hyperhidrosis: Recent Publication Trends from 2015 to 2025.

IF 1.4 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Aditya Joshi, David J Griego, Lauren Gawey, Raveena Ghanshani, Khiem A Tran, Jennifer L Hsiao, Vivian Y Shi
{"title":"Bibliometric Analysis in Hyperhidrosis: Recent Publication Trends from 2015 to 2025.","authors":"Aditya Joshi, David J Griego, Lauren Gawey, Raveena Ghanshani, Khiem A Tran, Jennifer L Hsiao, Vivian Y Shi","doi":"10.1159/000545767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hyperhidrosis is a chronic dermatologic condition that significantly impacts quality of life. While research has expanded in recent years, bibliometric analyses exploring publication trends remain limited. This study examined the 100 most-cited articles from 2015 to 2025 to assess research priorities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Scopus search was conducted on January 2, 2025, using the terms \"hyperhidrosis\", \"primary hyperhidrosis\", \"secondary hyperhidrosis\", and \"excessive sweating\". Non-English, abstract-only, and non-hyperhidrosis focused articles were excluded. Two reviewers screened and identified the 100 most-cited publications. Data were analyzed for publication year, authorship, country, study design, journal, and topic focus. The Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Level of Evidence (LoE) framework was used to assess study quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority (76%) of highly cited articles were published between 2015 and 2019. Randomized controlled trials (20%), cohort studies (18%), and case-control studies (16%) were the most common study types. Using LoE assessment, 33% of studies were level 1 (high-quality evidence). Research on treatments (55%) dominated, followed by quality of life (12%) and outcome measures (11%). The USA led in publication output.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This bibliometric analysis identifies evolving research priorities toward minimally invasive treatments and patient-centered outcomes, providing direction for future research and improvements in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":21844,"journal":{"name":"Skin Appendage Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12158438/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skin Appendage Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545767","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Hyperhidrosis is a chronic dermatologic condition that significantly impacts quality of life. While research has expanded in recent years, bibliometric analyses exploring publication trends remain limited. This study examined the 100 most-cited articles from 2015 to 2025 to assess research priorities.

Methods: A Scopus search was conducted on January 2, 2025, using the terms "hyperhidrosis", "primary hyperhidrosis", "secondary hyperhidrosis", and "excessive sweating". Non-English, abstract-only, and non-hyperhidrosis focused articles were excluded. Two reviewers screened and identified the 100 most-cited publications. Data were analyzed for publication year, authorship, country, study design, journal, and topic focus. The Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Level of Evidence (LoE) framework was used to assess study quality.

Results: The majority (76%) of highly cited articles were published between 2015 and 2019. Randomized controlled trials (20%), cohort studies (18%), and case-control studies (16%) were the most common study types. Using LoE assessment, 33% of studies were level 1 (high-quality evidence). Research on treatments (55%) dominated, followed by quality of life (12%) and outcome measures (11%). The USA led in publication output.

Conclusion: This bibliometric analysis identifies evolving research priorities toward minimally invasive treatments and patient-centered outcomes, providing direction for future research and improvements in clinical practice.

多汗症的文献计量分析:2015年至2025年的最新出版趋势。
简介:多汗症是一种慢性皮肤病,严重影响生活质量。虽然近年来研究已经扩大,但文献计量分析探索出版趋势仍然有限。本研究调查了2015年至2025年被引用最多的100篇文章,以评估研究重点。方法:于2025年1月2日进行Scopus检索,检索词为“多汗症”、“原发性多汗症”、“继发性多汗症”和“过度出汗”。非英文、纯摘要和非多汗症相关的文章被排除在外。两位审稿人筛选并确定了100篇被引用最多的出版物。数据分析包括出版年份、作者、国家、研究设计、期刊和主题重点。采用牛津循证医学中心证据水平(LoE)框架评估研究质量。结果:大多数高被引文章(76%)发表于2015年至2019年之间。随机对照试验(20%)、队列研究(18%)和病例对照研究(16%)是最常见的研究类型。使用LoE评估,33%的研究为1级(高质量证据)。治疗方面的研究占主导地位(55%),其次是生活质量(12%)和结果测量(11%)。美国的出版物数量最多。结论:该文献计量学分析确定了微创治疗和以患者为中心的结果的研究重点,为未来的研究和临床实践的改进提供了方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
69
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信