Real-life utilization of sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer: Patterns of practice in unmapped patients and effect on treatment and outcomes.

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
SAGE Open Medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20503121251342047
Danielle Glassman, Raadhika Kher, Cande V Ananth, Eugenia Girda
{"title":"Real-life utilization of sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer: Patterns of practice in unmapped patients and effect on treatment and outcomes.","authors":"Danielle Glassman, Raadhika Kher, Cande V Ananth, Eugenia Girda","doi":"10.1177/20503121251342047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the real-life utilization of sentinel lymph node mapping for surgical staging of patients with endometrial cancer. We evaluated patterns of surgical staging in unmapped patients and studied how this practice affected adjuvant therapies and survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with newly diagnosed endometrial cancer who underwent minimally invasive surgical staging, including sentinel lymph node mapping with cervical injection of indocyanine green from January 2019 to December 2021. Patient demographics, surgical findings, sentinel lymph node mapping, adjuvant therapy, and recurrence rates were collected. Sentinel lymph node detection rates were calculated, and reasons for omitting lymphadenectomy in unmapped patients were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 121 patients, 80 (66%) had successful sentinel lymph node mapping and 41 (34%) failed mapping. Our yearly detection rate was 63%, 68%, and 70% for 2019, 2020, and 2021, respectively. In patients with successful sentinel lymph node mapping, 73.8% were low-grade and 26.2% were high-grade histology. For patients with failed mapping, 75.6% were low-grade and 24.4% were high-grade histology. For the failed mapping cohort, 23 patients (56.1%) had a complete lymphadenectomy performed, of which 3 (13.0%) had positive lymph nodes. Reasons for omitting lymphadenectomy were documented as: (1) intraoperative pathologic evaluation; (2) inability to tolerate Trendelenburg; (3) difficulty with anatomical dissection/visualization; and (4) evidence of locally advanced disease. There were 18 incompletely staged patients, including 8 (44.4%) with low-risk disease, 2 (11.1%) with locally advanced disease, and 1 (5.6%) with serous histology. The remaining 7 (38.9%) unstaged patients were offered and/or received adjuvant radiation based on final pathology. During a short-term follow-up period, no patients in the unmapped or incompletely staged cohorts had a recurrence of the disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The rate of sentinel lymph node detection is improving. Low-risk disease identified on intraoperative pathology was the most common reason for omitting lymphadenectomy in unmapped patients, and that practice did not seem to affect adjuvant therapy or recurrence of disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":21398,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Medicine","volume":"13 ","pages":"20503121251342047"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12159469/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121251342047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the real-life utilization of sentinel lymph node mapping for surgical staging of patients with endometrial cancer. We evaluated patterns of surgical staging in unmapped patients and studied how this practice affected adjuvant therapies and survival.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with newly diagnosed endometrial cancer who underwent minimally invasive surgical staging, including sentinel lymph node mapping with cervical injection of indocyanine green from January 2019 to December 2021. Patient demographics, surgical findings, sentinel lymph node mapping, adjuvant therapy, and recurrence rates were collected. Sentinel lymph node detection rates were calculated, and reasons for omitting lymphadenectomy in unmapped patients were evaluated.

Results: Among 121 patients, 80 (66%) had successful sentinel lymph node mapping and 41 (34%) failed mapping. Our yearly detection rate was 63%, 68%, and 70% for 2019, 2020, and 2021, respectively. In patients with successful sentinel lymph node mapping, 73.8% were low-grade and 26.2% were high-grade histology. For patients with failed mapping, 75.6% were low-grade and 24.4% were high-grade histology. For the failed mapping cohort, 23 patients (56.1%) had a complete lymphadenectomy performed, of which 3 (13.0%) had positive lymph nodes. Reasons for omitting lymphadenectomy were documented as: (1) intraoperative pathologic evaluation; (2) inability to tolerate Trendelenburg; (3) difficulty with anatomical dissection/visualization; and (4) evidence of locally advanced disease. There were 18 incompletely staged patients, including 8 (44.4%) with low-risk disease, 2 (11.1%) with locally advanced disease, and 1 (5.6%) with serous histology. The remaining 7 (38.9%) unstaged patients were offered and/or received adjuvant radiation based on final pathology. During a short-term follow-up period, no patients in the unmapped or incompletely staged cohorts had a recurrence of the disease.

Conclusions: The rate of sentinel lymph node detection is improving. Low-risk disease identified on intraoperative pathology was the most common reason for omitting lymphadenectomy in unmapped patients, and that practice did not seem to affect adjuvant therapy or recurrence of disease.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

子宫内膜癌前哨淋巴结定位的实际应用:未定位患者的实践模式及其对治疗和结果的影响。
目的:探讨前哨淋巴结定位在子宫内膜癌患者手术分期中的实际应用。我们评估了未定位患者的手术分期模式,并研究了这种做法如何影响辅助治疗和生存。方法:对2019年1月至2021年12月行微创手术分期的新诊断子宫内膜癌患者进行回顾性图表回顾,包括宫颈注射吲哚菁绿前哨淋巴结造影术。收集患者人口统计资料、手术结果、前哨淋巴结定位、辅助治疗和复发率。计算前哨淋巴结检出率,并评估未定位患者省略淋巴结切除术的原因。结果:121例患者中,80例(66%)前哨淋巴结定位成功,41例(34%)失败。2019年、2020年和2021年的年检出率分别为63%、68%和70%。在前哨淋巴结定位成功的患者中,73.8%为低级别组织学,26.2%为高级别组织学。对于未成功定位的患者,75.6%为低级别,24.4%为高级别组织学。对于失败的定位队列,23例(56.1%)患者进行了完全的淋巴结切除术,其中3例(13.0%)淋巴结阳性。省略淋巴结切除术的原因如下:(1)术中病理评估;(2)不能忍受Trendelenburg;(3)解剖/可视化困难;(4)局部疾病进展的证据。分期不完全患者18例,其中低危8例(44.4%),局部晚期2例(11.1%),浆液组织学1例(5.6%)。其余7例(38.9%)未分期患者根据最终病理情况给予和/或接受辅助放疗。在短期随访期间,未定位或分期不完全的队列中没有患者出现疾病复发。结论:前哨淋巴结检出率有所提高。术中病理发现的低危性疾病是未确诊患者不行淋巴结切除术的最常见原因,而且这种做法似乎不影响辅助治疗或疾病复发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SAGE Open Medicine
SAGE Open Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
289
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信