An Integrative Review on Exploring Organ Donation After Death by Circulatory Criteria in Canada.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Progress in Transplantation Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-13 DOI:10.1177/15269248251349783
Kendra-Lee Dupuis, Amina Silva, Vanessa Silva E Silva
{"title":"An Integrative Review on Exploring Organ Donation After Death by Circulatory Criteria in Canada.","authors":"Kendra-Lee Dupuis, Amina Silva, Vanessa Silva E Silva","doi":"10.1177/15269248251349783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Rising discrepancies between supply and demand of lifesaving organs necessitates considering advancements to improve the health outcomes of Canadians. There is an increased use of organs after death by circulatory criteria, however the evolution of this treatment should be explored to continue to advance practices and save lives. <b>Objective:</b> To summarize the literature on the evolution and use of organ donation after death by circulatory criteria in Canada, to highlight how this donation modality may support future advancements. <b>Methods:</b> A search of electronic databases for any date until June 1st, 2024, was performed. Additional searches of grey literature using Google Scholar and the snowball technique were performed. Applicable documents underwent a multi-phase screening process, and data were extracted, analyzed, and evaluated. <b>Results:</b> There were 793 documents located, and 50 were included in this review. Three main categories emerged among the documents that described the evolution of guidelines for death by circulatory criteria organ donation, experiences with program development and delivery for death by circulatory criteria organ donation and Canadian perspectives of this donation modality. <b>Discussion:</b> Canada has made strides in circulatory criteria organ donation practices through consensus meetings and discussions on key topics, yet variations in practice exist across the country that warrant further investigation when considering future advancements. <b>Conclusion:</b> While national efforts have advanced practices, ongoing variations across programs highlighted the need for continued evaluation, education and harmonization to maximize the life-saving potential of organ donation practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":20671,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"161-171"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12284339/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15269248251349783","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Rising discrepancies between supply and demand of lifesaving organs necessitates considering advancements to improve the health outcomes of Canadians. There is an increased use of organs after death by circulatory criteria, however the evolution of this treatment should be explored to continue to advance practices and save lives. Objective: To summarize the literature on the evolution and use of organ donation after death by circulatory criteria in Canada, to highlight how this donation modality may support future advancements. Methods: A search of electronic databases for any date until June 1st, 2024, was performed. Additional searches of grey literature using Google Scholar and the snowball technique were performed. Applicable documents underwent a multi-phase screening process, and data were extracted, analyzed, and evaluated. Results: There were 793 documents located, and 50 were included in this review. Three main categories emerged among the documents that described the evolution of guidelines for death by circulatory criteria organ donation, experiences with program development and delivery for death by circulatory criteria organ donation and Canadian perspectives of this donation modality. Discussion: Canada has made strides in circulatory criteria organ donation practices through consensus meetings and discussions on key topics, yet variations in practice exist across the country that warrant further investigation when considering future advancements. Conclusion: While national efforts have advanced practices, ongoing variations across programs highlighted the need for continued evaluation, education and harmonization to maximize the life-saving potential of organ donation practices.

加拿大按循环系统标准探索死后器官捐献的综合综述。
导言:救生器官的供需差距越来越大,必须考虑改善加拿大人的健康状况。根据循环标准,死后器官的使用有所增加,但应探索这种治疗的演变,以继续推进实践并挽救生命。目的:总结加拿大按循环标准死后器官捐献的发展和使用的文献,强调这种捐赠方式如何支持未来的进步。方法:检索截至2024年6月1日的电子数据库。使用谷歌Scholar和雪球技术进行灰色文献的额外搜索。适用的文件经过多阶段筛选过程,数据被提取、分析和评估。结果:共检索到文献793篇,纳入文献50篇。这些文件中出现了三个主要类别,描述了循环标准死亡器官捐赠指南的演变,循环标准死亡器官捐赠方案开发和交付的经验以及加拿大对这种捐赠方式的看法。讨论:加拿大在循环标准器官捐赠实践方面取得了长足的进步,通过共识会议和关键主题的讨论,然而,在考虑未来的进展时,全国各地的实践存在差异,值得进一步调查。结论:虽然国家的努力取得了先进的实践成果,但各个项目之间的持续变化突出了继续评估、教育和协调的必要性,以最大限度地发挥器官捐赠实践的救生潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Progress in Transplantation
Progress in Transplantation SURGERY-TRANSPLANTATION
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Progress in Transplantation (PIT) is the official journal of NATCO, The Organization for Transplant Professionals. Journal Partners include: Australasian Transplant Coordinators Association and Society for Transplant Social Workers. PIT reflects the multi-disciplinary team approach to procurement and clinical aspects of organ and tissue transplantation by providing a professional forum for exchange of the continually changing body of knowledge in transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信