Optimization of Bond Strength Between Heat-Polymerized PMMA and Contemporary CAD/CAM Framework Materials: A Comparative In Vitro Study.

IF 4.7 3区 工程技术 Q1 POLYMER SCIENCE
Polymers Pub Date : 2025-05-27 DOI:10.3390/polym17111488
Başak Topdağı
{"title":"Optimization of Bond Strength Between Heat-Polymerized PMMA and Contemporary CAD/CAM Framework Materials: A Comparative In Vitro Study.","authors":"Başak Topdağı","doi":"10.3390/polym17111488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to comparatively evaluate the effects of various surface treatment protocols on the shear bond strength (SBS) between heat-polymerized polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and different CAD/CAM framework materials, including cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) alloys, ceramic particle-reinforced polyetheretherketone (PEEK), and glass fiber-reinforced composite resin (FRC). A total of 135 disc-shaped specimens were prepared from Co-Cr, PEEK, and FRC materials. Surface treatments specific to each material, including airborne-particle abrasion, sulfuric acid etching, laser irradiation, plasma activation, and primer application, were applied. PMMA cylinders were polymerized onto the treated surfaces, and all specimens were subjected to 30,000 thermal cycles. SBS values were measured using a universal testing machine, and the failure modes were classified. The normality of data distribution was assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, and the homogeneity of variances was evaluated using Levene's test. Group comparisons were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, and Dunn's post hoc test with Bonferroni correction was applied in cases where significant differences were detected (α = 0.05). The highest SBS values (~27-28 MPa) were obtained in the Co-Cr group and in the PEEK groups treated with sulfuric acid and primer. In contrast, the PEEK group with additional laser treatment exhibited a lower SBS value. The untreated PEEK group showed significantly lower SBS (~3.9 MPa) compared to all other groups. The Trinia groups demonstrated intermediate SBS values (16.5-17.4 MPa), which exceeded the clinically acceptable threshold of 10 MPa. SEM observations revealed material- and protocol-specific surface responses; plasma-treated specimens maintained topographic integrity, whereas laser-induced surfaces showed localized degradation, particularly following dual-step protocols. Fracture mode analysis indicated that higher SBS values were associated with cohesive or mixed failures. SEM observations suggested that plasma treatment preserved surface morphology more effectively than laser treatment. This study highlights the importance of selecting material-specific surface treatments to optimize bonding between CAD/CAM frameworks and PMMA. Sulfuric acid and primer provided strong adhesion for PEEK, while the addition of laser or plasma offered no further benefit, making such steps potentially unnecessary. Trinia frameworks also showed acceptable performance with conventional treatments. These findings reinforce that simplified conditioning protocols may be clinically sufficient, and indicate that FRC materials like Trinia should be more fully considered for their broader clinical potential in modern CAD/CAM-based prosthetic planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":20416,"journal":{"name":"Polymers","volume":"17 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12157249/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polymers","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17111488","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLYMER SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to comparatively evaluate the effects of various surface treatment protocols on the shear bond strength (SBS) between heat-polymerized polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and different CAD/CAM framework materials, including cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) alloys, ceramic particle-reinforced polyetheretherketone (PEEK), and glass fiber-reinforced composite resin (FRC). A total of 135 disc-shaped specimens were prepared from Co-Cr, PEEK, and FRC materials. Surface treatments specific to each material, including airborne-particle abrasion, sulfuric acid etching, laser irradiation, plasma activation, and primer application, were applied. PMMA cylinders were polymerized onto the treated surfaces, and all specimens were subjected to 30,000 thermal cycles. SBS values were measured using a universal testing machine, and the failure modes were classified. The normality of data distribution was assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, and the homogeneity of variances was evaluated using Levene's test. Group comparisons were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, and Dunn's post hoc test with Bonferroni correction was applied in cases where significant differences were detected (α = 0.05). The highest SBS values (~27-28 MPa) were obtained in the Co-Cr group and in the PEEK groups treated with sulfuric acid and primer. In contrast, the PEEK group with additional laser treatment exhibited a lower SBS value. The untreated PEEK group showed significantly lower SBS (~3.9 MPa) compared to all other groups. The Trinia groups demonstrated intermediate SBS values (16.5-17.4 MPa), which exceeded the clinically acceptable threshold of 10 MPa. SEM observations revealed material- and protocol-specific surface responses; plasma-treated specimens maintained topographic integrity, whereas laser-induced surfaces showed localized degradation, particularly following dual-step protocols. Fracture mode analysis indicated that higher SBS values were associated with cohesive or mixed failures. SEM observations suggested that plasma treatment preserved surface morphology more effectively than laser treatment. This study highlights the importance of selecting material-specific surface treatments to optimize bonding between CAD/CAM frameworks and PMMA. Sulfuric acid and primer provided strong adhesion for PEEK, while the addition of laser or plasma offered no further benefit, making such steps potentially unnecessary. Trinia frameworks also showed acceptable performance with conventional treatments. These findings reinforce that simplified conditioning protocols may be clinically sufficient, and indicate that FRC materials like Trinia should be more fully considered for their broader clinical potential in modern CAD/CAM-based prosthetic planning.

热聚合PMMA与当代CAD/CAM框架材料的结合强度优化:体外比较研究。
本研究旨在比较评价不同表面处理方案对热聚合聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)与不同CAD/CAM框架材料(钴铬(Co-Cr)合金、陶瓷颗粒增强聚醚醚酮(PEEK)和玻璃纤维增强复合树脂(FRC))之间剪切结合强度(SBS)的影响。采用Co-Cr、PEEK和FRC材料共制备了135个圆盘状试样。对每种材料进行了具体的表面处理,包括空气颗粒磨损、硫酸蚀刻、激光照射、等离子体活化和底漆应用。PMMA圆柱体被聚合到处理过的表面上,所有的样品都经历了30000次热循环。采用通用试验机测量了SBS值,并对其失效模式进行了分类。采用Kolmogorov-Smirnov检验评估数据分布的正态性,采用Levene检验评估方差的齐性。组间比较采用Kruskal-Wallis检验,差异显著者采用Dunn’s事后检验,Bonferroni校正(α = 0.05)。Co-Cr组和经硫酸和底漆处理的PEEK组SBS值最高(~27 ~ 28 MPa)。相比之下,PEEK组与额外的激光治疗表现出较低的SBS值。与其他各组相比,未经治疗的PEEK组SBS明显降低(~3.9 MPa)。Trinia组表现出中间的SBS值(16.5-17.4 MPa),超过了临床可接受的10 MPa阈值。扫描电镜观察揭示了材料和协议特定的表面响应;等离子体处理的样品保持了地形的完整性,而激光诱导的表面则出现了局部退化,特别是在两步处理后。断裂模式分析表明,较高的SBS值与内聚性或混合性破坏有关。扫描电镜观察表明,等离子体处理比激光处理更有效地保存了表面形态。这项研究强调了选择特定材料表面处理的重要性,以优化CAD/CAM框架与PMMA之间的粘合。硫酸和底漆为PEEK提供了很强的附着力,而激光或等离子体的加入没有进一步的好处,因此这些步骤可能是不必要的。Trinia框架在常规治疗中也表现出可接受的性能。这些发现加强了简化的调理方案可能在临床上是足够的,并表明FRC材料如Trinia应该更充分地考虑其更广泛的临床潜力,在现代CAD/ cam为基础的假肢规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Polymers
Polymers POLYMER SCIENCE-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
16.00%
发文量
4697
审稿时长
1.3 months
期刊介绍: Polymers (ISSN 2073-4360) is an international, open access journal of polymer science. It publishes research papers, short communications and review papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Polymers provides an interdisciplinary forum for publishing papers which advance the fields of (i) polymerization methods, (ii) theory, simulation, and modeling, (iii) understanding of new physical phenomena, (iv) advances in characterization techniques, and (v) harnessing of self-assembly and biological strategies for producing complex multifunctional structures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信