Comparative LCA Analysis of Selected Recycling Methods for Carbon Fibers and Socio-Economic Analysis.

IF 3.1 3区 材料科学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Materials Pub Date : 2025-06-05 DOI:10.3390/ma18112660
Nikolina Poranek, Krzysztof Pikoń, Natalia Generowicz-Caba, Maciej Mańka, Joanna Kulczycka, Dimitrios Marinis, Ergina Farsari, Eleftherios Amanatides, Anna Lewandowska, Marcin Sajdak, Sebastian Werle, Szymon Sobek
{"title":"Comparative LCA Analysis of Selected Recycling Methods for Carbon Fibers and Socio-Economic Analysis.","authors":"Nikolina Poranek, Krzysztof Pikoń, Natalia Generowicz-Caba, Maciej Mańka, Joanna Kulczycka, Dimitrios Marinis, Ergina Farsari, Eleftherios Amanatides, Anna Lewandowska, Marcin Sajdak, Sebastian Werle, Szymon Sobek","doi":"10.3390/ma18112660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Carbon fiber is essential in many industries. Since primary production is highly energy-intensive, recycling technologies are being sought. A goal of the research was to develop at a laboratory scale a chemical recycling method aimed at recovering carbon fiber. Two variants of the method have been established and environmentally compared with a primary production version.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The life cycle assessment methodology has been used to assess and quantify the environmental impacts. The cradle to gate analysis was performed with the functional unit defined as a production of 1 kg of carbon fiber.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The best environmental option turned out to be a developed chemical recycling technology named Scenario 1. It is a solvolysis performed using an ambient-pressure-operated batch reactor connected to a reflux condenser and an inert gas supply tank, using an ethylene glycol and potassium hydroxide solution. The worst case appeared to be the second variant of the chemical recycling, named Scenario 2 (plasma-enhanced nitric acid solvolysis).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In Scenario 1, a production of the ethylene glycol was recognized as a key environmental driver, while in Scenarios 2 and 3 the energy-related impact was the most influential.</p>","PeriodicalId":18281,"journal":{"name":"Materials","volume":"18 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12156226/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18112660","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Carbon fiber is essential in many industries. Since primary production is highly energy-intensive, recycling technologies are being sought. A goal of the research was to develop at a laboratory scale a chemical recycling method aimed at recovering carbon fiber. Two variants of the method have been established and environmentally compared with a primary production version.

Methods: The life cycle assessment methodology has been used to assess and quantify the environmental impacts. The cradle to gate analysis was performed with the functional unit defined as a production of 1 kg of carbon fiber.

Results: The best environmental option turned out to be a developed chemical recycling technology named Scenario 1. It is a solvolysis performed using an ambient-pressure-operated batch reactor connected to a reflux condenser and an inert gas supply tank, using an ethylene glycol and potassium hydroxide solution. The worst case appeared to be the second variant of the chemical recycling, named Scenario 2 (plasma-enhanced nitric acid solvolysis).

Conclusions: In Scenario 1, a production of the ethylene glycol was recognized as a key environmental driver, while in Scenarios 2 and 3 the energy-related impact was the most influential.

碳纤维回收方法的比较LCA分析与社会经济分析。
碳纤维在许多工业中都是必不可少的。由于初级生产是高度能源密集的,因此正在寻求回收技术。这项研究的一个目标是在实验室规模上开发一种旨在回收碳纤维的化学回收方法。已经建立了该方法的两个变体,并与主要生产版本进行了环境比较。方法:采用生命周期评价方法对环境影响进行评价和量化。从摇篮到闸门的分析是用定义为生产1公斤碳纤维的功能单位进行的。结果:最佳的环境方案是一种成熟的化学回收技术,称为情景1。它是使用连接到回流冷凝器和惰性气体供应罐的常压操作间歇式反应器进行溶剂分解,使用乙二醇和氢氧化钾溶液。最糟糕的情况似乎是化学循环的第二种变体,称为情景2(血浆增强硝酸溶解)。结论:在情景1中,乙二醇的生产被认为是一个关键的环境驱动因素,而在情景2和情景3中,与能源相关的影响是最具影响力的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Materials
Materials MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
14.70%
发文量
7753
审稿时长
1.2 months
期刊介绍: Materials (ISSN 1996-1944) is an open access journal of related scientific research and technology development. It publishes reviews, regular research papers (articles) and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Materials provides a forum for publishing papers which advance the in-depth understanding of the relationship between the structure, the properties or the functions of all kinds of materials. Chemical syntheses, chemical structures and mechanical, chemical, electronic, magnetic and optical properties and various applications will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信