Valentin Goutaudier, Olivier Aubert, Maud Racapé, Agathe Truchot, Marta Sablik, Marc Raynaud, Éric Vicaut, Olivia Rousseau, Michelle Elias, Gillian Divard, Emmanuelle Papuchon, Richard Danger, Béatrice Charreau, Didier Bouton, Thao Nguyen-Khoa, Christine Randoux-Lebrun, Jean-Luc Taupin, Pierre-Antoine Gourraud, Magali Giral, Moglie Le Quintrec, Emmanuel Morelon, Lionel Couzi, Christophe Legendre, Carmen Lefaucheur, Nassim Kamar, Sophie Brouard, Dany Anglicheau, Alexandre Loupy
{"title":"Detection of Kidney Allograft Rejection Using Urinary Chemokines.","authors":"Valentin Goutaudier, Olivier Aubert, Maud Racapé, Agathe Truchot, Marta Sablik, Marc Raynaud, Éric Vicaut, Olivia Rousseau, Michelle Elias, Gillian Divard, Emmanuelle Papuchon, Richard Danger, Béatrice Charreau, Didier Bouton, Thao Nguyen-Khoa, Christine Randoux-Lebrun, Jean-Luc Taupin, Pierre-Antoine Gourraud, Magali Giral, Moglie Le Quintrec, Emmanuel Morelon, Lionel Couzi, Christophe Legendre, Carmen Lefaucheur, Nassim Kamar, Sophie Brouard, Dany Anglicheau, Alexandre Loupy","doi":"10.1681/ASN.0000000742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Urinary chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10 have shown promise for detecting kidney allograft rejection, but the demonstration of their added value beyond standard of care patient monitoring requires further study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively enrolled adult patients who underwent kidney transplantation in 7 transplant referral centers between July 2018 and December 2019 (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03582436). We quantified urinary CXCL9 and CXCL10 protein levels at the time of kidney allograft biopsies in the first year post-transplantation using an automated immunoassay platform. The primary outcome was allograft rejection defined according to the international Banff 2019 classification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 733 kidney transplant patients (64% male, 36% female) were included in the main analysis, with 1,549 biopsies paired with a urine sample. The cumulative incidence of rejection was 10%. For detecting allograft rejection, urinary CXCL9 and CXCL10 demonstrated areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-0.75) and 0.64 (95% CI, 0.58-0.71), respectively. Adding urinary CXCL9 to a standard of care model improved discrimination for allograft rejection (AUROC 0.75 [percentile bootstrap CI 0.70-0.79] to 0.78 [percentile bootstrap CI 0.73-0.83]), while urinary CXCL10 did not. There was no improvement of overall fit with the addition of urinary CXCL9 (Brier score changed from 0.056 [95% CI, 0.046-0.067] to 0.054 [95% CI, 0.045-0.064]), as this tended to overestimate the risk for allograft rejection. In sensitivity analyses restricting to only acute/active forms of rejection or to a single randomly selected biopsy per patient, urinary chemokines did not show additional value beyond the standard of care. In addition, existing chemokine-based models showed low to moderate performance for the detection of allograft rejection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Urinary CXCL9 demonstrated limited clinical utility, while urinary CXCL10 provided no additional value beyond standard of care monitoring for detecting allograft rejection within the first year after kidney transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":17217,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Society of Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The American Society of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.0000000742","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Urinary chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10 have shown promise for detecting kidney allograft rejection, but the demonstration of their added value beyond standard of care patient monitoring requires further study.
Methods: We prospectively enrolled adult patients who underwent kidney transplantation in 7 transplant referral centers between July 2018 and December 2019 (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03582436). We quantified urinary CXCL9 and CXCL10 protein levels at the time of kidney allograft biopsies in the first year post-transplantation using an automated immunoassay platform. The primary outcome was allograft rejection defined according to the international Banff 2019 classification.
Results: Overall, 733 kidney transplant patients (64% male, 36% female) were included in the main analysis, with 1,549 biopsies paired with a urine sample. The cumulative incidence of rejection was 10%. For detecting allograft rejection, urinary CXCL9 and CXCL10 demonstrated areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-0.75) and 0.64 (95% CI, 0.58-0.71), respectively. Adding urinary CXCL9 to a standard of care model improved discrimination for allograft rejection (AUROC 0.75 [percentile bootstrap CI 0.70-0.79] to 0.78 [percentile bootstrap CI 0.73-0.83]), while urinary CXCL10 did not. There was no improvement of overall fit with the addition of urinary CXCL9 (Brier score changed from 0.056 [95% CI, 0.046-0.067] to 0.054 [95% CI, 0.045-0.064]), as this tended to overestimate the risk for allograft rejection. In sensitivity analyses restricting to only acute/active forms of rejection or to a single randomly selected biopsy per patient, urinary chemokines did not show additional value beyond the standard of care. In addition, existing chemokine-based models showed low to moderate performance for the detection of allograft rejection.
Conclusions: Urinary CXCL9 demonstrated limited clinical utility, while urinary CXCL10 provided no additional value beyond standard of care monitoring for detecting allograft rejection within the first year after kidney transplantation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (JASN) stands as the preeminent kidney journal globally, offering an exceptional synthesis of cutting-edge basic research, clinical epidemiology, meta-analysis, and relevant editorial content. Representing a comprehensive resource, JASN encompasses clinical research, editorials distilling key findings, perspectives, and timely reviews.
Editorials are skillfully crafted to elucidate the essential insights of the parent article, while JASN actively encourages the submission of Letters to the Editor discussing recently published articles. The reviews featured in JASN are consistently erudite and comprehensive, providing thorough coverage of respective fields. Since its inception in July 1990, JASN has been a monthly publication.
JASN publishes original research reports and editorial content across a spectrum of basic and clinical science relevant to the broad discipline of nephrology. Topics covered include renal cell biology, developmental biology of the kidney, genetics of kidney disease, cell and transport physiology, hemodynamics and vascular regulation, mechanisms of blood pressure regulation, renal immunology, kidney pathology, pathophysiology of kidney diseases, nephrolithiasis, clinical nephrology (including dialysis and transplantation), and hypertension. Furthermore, articles addressing healthcare policy and care delivery issues relevant to nephrology are warmly welcomed.