Carlos Sendra-Pérez, Alberto Encarnación-Martínez, Juan M Murias, Carlos De la Fuente, Rosario Salvador-Palmer, Fernando Martin-Rivera, Jose I Priego-Quesada
{"title":"Muscular excitation and oxygen extraction responses in power-generating and stabilizing muscles during a graded cycling test.","authors":"Carlos Sendra-Pérez, Alberto Encarnación-Martínez, Juan M Murias, Carlos De la Fuente, Rosario Salvador-Palmer, Fernando Martin-Rivera, Jose I Priego-Quesada","doi":"10.1080/02640414.2025.2518015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although some studies have shown an agreement between near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and surface electromyography signals during dynamic exercise for a single muscle, research assessing multiple muscles with different roles is lacking. This would improve understanding of the connection between muscle excitation and muscle oxygen saturation (SmO<sub>2</sub>) profiles. Our study evaluated whether muscle excitation aligns with SmO2 during cycling in graded exercise testing. Fifteen cyclists and triathletes (age = 22 ± 6 years, stature = 175 ± 8 cm, training hours = 12 ± 4 hours·week<sup>-1</sup>) performed a graded exercise test on a cycle ergometer. NIRS and electromyography devices were placed on the preferred sides of the vastus lateralis, tibialis anterior, gastrocnemius medialis, and biceps femoris. Results showed that, in general, while average root mean square (RMS) increased, SmO<sub>2</sub> decreased (<i>p</i> < 0.05), except in the gastrocnemius medialis, which remained stable. Vastus lateralis and biceps femoris exhibited moderate signal agreement between RMS and SmO<sub>2</sub> (CCCLin: vastus lateralis = 0.70; biceps femoris = 0.50), while stabilizing muscles showed weak agreement (gastrocnemius medialis CCCLin = 0.32; tibialis anterior CCCLin = 0.39). In conclusion, power-generating and stabilizing muscles respond oppositely in SmO<sub>2</sub> and RMS during progressively increasing intensity exercise until exhaustion.</p>","PeriodicalId":17066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1675-1684"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2518015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Although some studies have shown an agreement between near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and surface electromyography signals during dynamic exercise for a single muscle, research assessing multiple muscles with different roles is lacking. This would improve understanding of the connection between muscle excitation and muscle oxygen saturation (SmO2) profiles. Our study evaluated whether muscle excitation aligns with SmO2 during cycling in graded exercise testing. Fifteen cyclists and triathletes (age = 22 ± 6 years, stature = 175 ± 8 cm, training hours = 12 ± 4 hours·week-1) performed a graded exercise test on a cycle ergometer. NIRS and electromyography devices were placed on the preferred sides of the vastus lateralis, tibialis anterior, gastrocnemius medialis, and biceps femoris. Results showed that, in general, while average root mean square (RMS) increased, SmO2 decreased (p < 0.05), except in the gastrocnemius medialis, which remained stable. Vastus lateralis and biceps femoris exhibited moderate signal agreement between RMS and SmO2 (CCCLin: vastus lateralis = 0.70; biceps femoris = 0.50), while stabilizing muscles showed weak agreement (gastrocnemius medialis CCCLin = 0.32; tibialis anterior CCCLin = 0.39). In conclusion, power-generating and stabilizing muscles respond oppositely in SmO2 and RMS during progressively increasing intensity exercise until exhaustion.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Sports Sciences has an international reputation for publishing articles of a high standard and is both Medline and Clarivate Analytics-listed. It publishes research on various aspects of the sports and exercise sciences, including anatomy, biochemistry, biomechanics, performance analysis, physiology, psychology, sports medicine and health, as well as coaching and talent identification, kinanthropometry and other interdisciplinary perspectives.
The emphasis of the Journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined and applied to sport and exercise. Besides experimental work in human responses to exercise, the subjects covered will include human responses to technologies such as the design of sports equipment and playing facilities, research in training, selection, performance prediction or modification, and stress reduction or manifestation. Manuscripts considered for publication include those dealing with original investigations of exercise, validation of technological innovations in sport or comprehensive reviews of topics relevant to the scientific study of sport.